Srinivasan Anand, Dutta Pinaki, Bansal Dipika, Chakrabarti Amitava, Bhansali Anil Kumar, Hota Debasish
Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Department of Endocrinology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
J Diabetes. 2021 Oct;13(10):770-778. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13202. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
There is a need for newer therapies for chronic painful diabetic neuropathy as the existing drugs have their own limitations. Clinical trials on low-dose naltrexone (1-5 mg/d) showed efficacy and safety in certain chronic painful conditions, but not in painful diabetic neuropathy. Hence the present study was planned.
Sixty-seven participants with painful diabetic neuropathy were randomized to receive either 2 mg naltrexone or 10 mg amitriptyline daily following a 2-week run-in period. The participants were followed up every 2 weeks for a total of 6 weeks. Up-titration was done (to 4 mg naltrexone or 25/50 mg amitriptyline) if the pain reduction was less than 20% on the visual analog scale (VAS) during the next follow-up visit. Efficacy was assessed using the change in VAS score at the end of 6 weeks from baseline. Safety was evaluated at each follow-up visit. After 2 weeks of washout period, the participants were crossed over to receive the comparator drug for another 6 weeks with similar evaluations.
The difference (confidence interval) in the change in VAS score between groups from baseline was 1.64 (-0.92 to 4.20) in per-protocol analysis and 1.5 (-1.11 to 4.13) in intention-to-treat analysis. Eight and fifty-two adverse events were reported in the naltrexone and amitriptyline groups, respectively (P < .001). The most common adverse events were mild diarrhea with naltrexone and somnolence with amitriptyline.
Low-dose naltrexone exhibited similar efficacy and a superior safety profile compared with amitriptyline in painful diabetic neuropathy.
由于现有药物存在自身局限性,因此需要针对慢性疼痛性糖尿病神经病变开发更新的治疗方法。低剂量纳曲酮(1 - 5毫克/天)的临床试验在某些慢性疼痛病症中显示出疗效和安全性,但在疼痛性糖尿病神经病变中却并非如此。因此开展了本研究。
67名患有疼痛性糖尿病神经病变的参与者在经过2周的导入期后,被随机分配为每日接受2毫克纳曲酮或10毫克阿米替林治疗。参与者每2周接受一次随访,共随访6周。如果在下一次随访时视觉模拟量表(VAS)上疼痛减轻小于20%,则进行剂量递增(至4毫克纳曲酮或25/50毫克阿米替林)。使用6周结束时VAS评分相对于基线的变化来评估疗效。每次随访时评估安全性。在2周的洗脱期后,参与者交叉接受对照药物治疗另外6周,并进行类似评估。
在符合方案分析中,两组VAS评分相对于基线的变化差异(置信区间)为1.64(-0.92至4.20),在意向性分析中为1.5(-1.11至4.13)。纳曲酮组和阿米替林组分别报告了8例和52例不良事件(P <.001)。最常见的不良事件是纳曲酮引起的轻度腹泻和阿米替林引起的嗜睡。
在疼痛性糖尿病神经病变中,低剂量纳曲酮与阿米替林相比,疗效相似,但安全性更佳。