Suppr超能文献

用于预测人体血浆蛋白结合的定量构效关系算法评估

Evaluation of Quantitative Structure Property Relationship Algorithms for Predicting Plasma Protein Binding in Humans.

作者信息

Yun Yejin Esther, Tornero-Velez Rogelio, Purucker S Thomas, Chang Daniel T, Edginton Andrea N

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Comput Toxicol. 2021 Feb 1;17:100142. doi: 10.1016/j.comtox.2020.100142.

Abstract

The extent of plasma protein binding is an important compound-specific property that influences a compound's pharmacokinetic behavior and is a critical input parameter for predicting exposure in physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. When experimentally determined fraction unbound in plasma (fup) data are not available, quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models can be used for prediction. Because available QSPR models were developed based on training sets containing pharmaceutical-like compounds, we compared their prediction accuracy for environmentally relevant and pharmaceutical compounds. Fup values were calculated using Ingle et al., Watanabe et al. and ADMET Predictor (Simulation Plus). The test set included 818 pharmaceutical and environmentally relevant compounds with fup values ranging from 0.01 to 1. Overall, the three QSPR models resulted in over-prediction of fup for highly binding compounds and under-prediction for low or moderately binding compounds. For highly binding compounds (0.01≤ fup ≤ 0.25), Watanabe et al. performed better with a lower mean absolute error (MAE) of 6.7% and a lower mean absolute relative prediction error (RPE) of 171.7 % than other methods. For low to moderately binding compounds, both Ingle et al. and ADMET Predictor performed better than Watanabe et al. with superior MAE and RPE values. The positive polar surface area, the number of basic functional groups and lipophilicity were the most important chemical descriptors for predicting fup. This study demonstrated that the prediction of fup was the most uncertain for highly binding compounds. This suggested that QSPR-predicted fup values should be used with caution in PBPK modeling.

摘要

血浆蛋白结合程度是一种重要的化合物特异性性质,它会影响化合物的药代动力学行为,并且是在基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)模型中预测暴露量的关键输入参数。当无法获得实验测定的血浆中未结合分数(fup)数据时,可以使用定量结构-性质关系(QSPR)模型进行预测。由于现有的QSPR模型是基于包含类药物化合物的训练集开发的,因此我们比较了它们对环境相关化合物和药物化合物的预测准确性。使用Ingle等人、Watanabe等人的方法以及ADMET Predictor(Simulation Plus)计算fup值。测试集包括818种药物和环境相关化合物,其fup值范围为0.01至1。总体而言,这三种QSPR模型对高结合化合物的fup预测过高,对低或中等结合化合物的预测过低。对于高结合化合物(0.01≤fup≤0.25),Watanabe等人的表现更好,平均绝对误差(MAE)为6.7%,平均绝对相对预测误差(RPE)为171.7%,低于其他方法。对于低至中等结合化合物,Ingle等人和ADMET Predictor的表现均优于Watanabe等人,MAE和RPE值更优。正极性表面积、碱性官能团数量和亲脂性是预测fup最重要的化学描述符。这项研究表明,对于高结合化合物,fup的预测最不确定。这表明在PBPK建模中应谨慎使用QSPR预测的fup值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/511d/8128700/66514dad8517/nihms-1678405-f0001.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

10
High-throughput PBTK models for to extrapolation.用于从到外推的高通量 PBTK 模型。
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2021 Aug;17(8):903-921. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2021.1935867. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

3
PubChem 2019 update: improved access to chemical data.PubChem 2019 年更新:改善化学数据获取。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D1102-D1109. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1033.
4
New approach for understanding genome variations in KEGG.KEGG 中基因组变异的新方法。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D590-D595. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky962.
7
Mordred: a molecular descriptor calculator.莫德雷德:一种分子描述符计算器。
J Cheminform. 2018 Feb 6;10(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13321-018-0258-y.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验