Yun Yejin Esther, Tornero-Velez Rogelio, Purucker S Thomas, Chang Daniel T, Edginton Andrea N
School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Comput Toxicol. 2021 Feb 1;17:100142. doi: 10.1016/j.comtox.2020.100142.
The extent of plasma protein binding is an important compound-specific property that influences a compound's pharmacokinetic behavior and is a critical input parameter for predicting exposure in physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. When experimentally determined fraction unbound in plasma (fup) data are not available, quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models can be used for prediction. Because available QSPR models were developed based on training sets containing pharmaceutical-like compounds, we compared their prediction accuracy for environmentally relevant and pharmaceutical compounds. Fup values were calculated using Ingle et al., Watanabe et al. and ADMET Predictor (Simulation Plus). The test set included 818 pharmaceutical and environmentally relevant compounds with fup values ranging from 0.01 to 1. Overall, the three QSPR models resulted in over-prediction of fup for highly binding compounds and under-prediction for low or moderately binding compounds. For highly binding compounds (0.01≤ fup ≤ 0.25), Watanabe et al. performed better with a lower mean absolute error (MAE) of 6.7% and a lower mean absolute relative prediction error (RPE) of 171.7 % than other methods. For low to moderately binding compounds, both Ingle et al. and ADMET Predictor performed better than Watanabe et al. with superior MAE and RPE values. The positive polar surface area, the number of basic functional groups and lipophilicity were the most important chemical descriptors for predicting fup. This study demonstrated that the prediction of fup was the most uncertain for highly binding compounds. This suggested that QSPR-predicted fup values should be used with caution in PBPK modeling.
血浆蛋白结合程度是一种重要的化合物特异性性质,它会影响化合物的药代动力学行为,并且是在基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)模型中预测暴露量的关键输入参数。当无法获得实验测定的血浆中未结合分数(fup)数据时,可以使用定量结构-性质关系(QSPR)模型进行预测。由于现有的QSPR模型是基于包含类药物化合物的训练集开发的,因此我们比较了它们对环境相关化合物和药物化合物的预测准确性。使用Ingle等人、Watanabe等人的方法以及ADMET Predictor(Simulation Plus)计算fup值。测试集包括818种药物和环境相关化合物,其fup值范围为0.01至1。总体而言,这三种QSPR模型对高结合化合物的fup预测过高,对低或中等结合化合物的预测过低。对于高结合化合物(0.01≤fup≤0.25),Watanabe等人的表现更好,平均绝对误差(MAE)为6.7%,平均绝对相对预测误差(RPE)为171.7%,低于其他方法。对于低至中等结合化合物,Ingle等人和ADMET Predictor的表现均优于Watanabe等人,MAE和RPE值更优。正极性表面积、碱性官能团数量和亲脂性是预测fup最重要的化学描述符。这项研究表明,对于高结合化合物,fup的预测最不确定。这表明在PBPK建模中应谨慎使用QSPR预测的fup值。