• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助治疗和根治性前切除术后 ypN0 直肠癌患者长期生存结局的危险因素评估。

The assessment of risk factors for long-term survival outcome in ypN0 patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and radical anterior resection.

机构信息

The Oncologic and Reconstructive Surgery Clinic, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, 44-100, Gliwice, Poland.

Tumor Pathology Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, 44-100, Gliwice, Poland.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2021 May 21;19(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02262-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12957-021-02262-x
PMID:34020673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8140444/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The main negative prognostic factors in patients with rectal cancer after radical treatment include regional lymph node involvement, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion. However, some patients still develop cancer recurrence despite the absence of the above risk factors. The aim of the study was to assess clinicopathological factors influencing long-term oncologic outcomes in ypN0M0 rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy and radical anterior resection.

METHODS

A retrospective survival analysis was performed on a group of 195 patients. We assessed clinicopathological factors which included tumor regression grade, number of lymph nodes in the specimen, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL).

RESULTS

In the univariate analysis, AL and CCI > 3 had a significant negative impact on disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). After the division of ALs into early and late ALs, it was found that only patients with late ALs had a significantly worse survival. The multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that CCI > 3 was a significant adverse risk factor for DFS (HR 5.78, 95% CI 2.15-15.51, p < 0.001), DSS (HR 7.25, 95% CI 2.25-23.39, p < 0.001), and OS (HR 3.9, 95% CI 1.72-8.85, p = 0.001). Similarly, late ALs had a significant negative impact on the risk of DFS (HR 5.05, 95% CI 1.97-12.93, p < 0.001), DSS (HR 10.84, 95% CI 3.44-34.18, p < 0.001), and OS (HR 4.3, 95% CI 1.94-9.53, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Late AL and CCI > 3 are the factors that may have an impact on long-term oncologic outcomes. The impact of lymph node yield on understaging was not demonstrated.

摘要

背景

直肠癌根治术后局部淋巴结转移、脉管侵犯和神经侵犯是影响患者预后的主要危险因素,但仍有部分患者即使不具备上述危险因素,也会出现肿瘤复发。本研究旨在评估新辅助治疗及直肠前切除术治疗后 ypN0M0 期直肠癌患者的临床病理因素对长期肿瘤学结果的影响。

方法

对 195 例患者进行回顾性生存分析。评估肿瘤退缩分级、标本中淋巴结数量、Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)和结直肠吻合口漏(AL)等临床病理因素。

结果

单因素分析显示,AL 和 CCI>3 对无病生存(DFS)、疾病特异性生存(DSS)和总生存(OS)有显著的负面影响。将 AL 分为早期和晚期后,发现只有晚期 AL 患者的生存状况明显更差。多因素 Cox 回归分析显示,CCI>3 是 DFS(HR5.78,95%CI2.15-15.51,p<0.001)、DSS(HR7.25,95%CI2.25-23.39,p<0.001)和 OS(HR3.9,95%CI1.72-8.85,p=0.001)的显著不良危险因素。同样,晚期 AL 对 DFS(HR5.05,95%CI1.97-12.93,p<0.001)、DSS(HR10.84,95%CI3.44-34.18,p<0.001)和 OS(HR4.3,95%CI1.94-9.53,p<0.001)的风险也有显著的负面影响。

结论

晚期 AL 和 CCI>3 是影响长期肿瘤学结果的因素,而淋巴结检出数对分期不足的影响并未得到证实。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d801/8140444/420f41ef79ce/12957_2021_2262_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d801/8140444/ccdcaa9d9d12/12957_2021_2262_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d801/8140444/f7d50f6bf6c2/12957_2021_2262_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d801/8140444/420f41ef79ce/12957_2021_2262_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d801/8140444/ccdcaa9d9d12/12957_2021_2262_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d801/8140444/f7d50f6bf6c2/12957_2021_2262_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d801/8140444/420f41ef79ce/12957_2021_2262_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The assessment of risk factors for long-term survival outcome in ypN0 patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and radical anterior resection.新辅助治疗和根治性前切除术后 ypN0 直肠癌患者长期生存结局的危险因素评估。
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 May 21;19(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02262-x.
2
Risk factors for long-term survival in patients with ypN+ M0 rectal cancer after radical anterior resection.根治性前切除术治疗后 ypN+M0 直肠腺癌患者长期生存的危险因素。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar 26;22(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02226-9.
3
[A single center retrospective study on surgical efficacy of T3NxM0 middle-low rectal cancer without neoadjuvant therapy].一项关于未行新辅助治疗的T3NxM0中低位直肠癌手术疗效的单中心回顾性研究
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jan 25;22(1):66-72.
4
The impact of anastomotic leak on long-term oncological outcomes after low anterior resection for mid-low rectal cancer: extended follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.中低位直肠癌前切除术吻合口漏对长期肿瘤学结局的影响:一项随机对照试验的延长随访。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jul;37(7):1689-1698. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04204-9. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
5
[Clinicopathological and prognostic features of young onset patients with middle-low rectal cancer received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy].[接受新辅助放化疗的中青年低位直肠癌患者的临床病理特征及预后因素]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2021 May 23;43(5):574-580. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20201220-01083.
6
Long-term oncologic outcomes following anastomotic leak after anterior resection for rectal cancer: does the leak severity matter?直肠癌前切除术后吻合口漏的长期肿瘤学结果:漏口严重程度是否重要?
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):4166-4176. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07189-9. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
7
Circumferential Resection Margin Status as a Predictive Factor for Recurrence in Preoperative MRI for Advanced Lower Rectal Cancer Without Preoperative Therapy.术前 MRI 检查预测未行术前治疗的局部进展期低位直肠癌环周切缘状态与复发的相关性
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Jan;64(1):71-80. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001769.
8
Prognostic impact of residual lateral lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy in patients with advanced low rectal cancer.新辅助(放化疗)后残余侧方淋巴结转移对局部进展期低位直肠癌患者预后的影响。
BJS Open. 2019 Jul 25;3(6):822-829. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50194. eCollection 2019 Dec.
9
Prognostic value of metastatic lymph node regression grade after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.新辅助放化疗后局部晚期直肠癌患者转移性淋巴结退缩分级的预后价值。
Surgery. 2019 Dec;166(6):1061-1067. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
10
Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term oncologic outcome and its related factors in rectal cancer.吻合口漏对直肠癌长期肿瘤学结局的影响及其相关因素
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(30):e4367. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004367.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the risk factors of major complications after radical rectal cancer surgery.预测直肠癌根治术后主要并发症危险因素的列线图的开发与验证
Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 21;14:1380535. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1380535. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of complications and bowel function among different reconstruction techniques after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较低位前切除术后不同重建技术的并发症和肠道功能:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Mar 10;21(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-02977-z.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The risk factors of local recurrence and distant metastasis on pT1/T2N0 mid-low rectal cancer after total mesorectal excision.全直肠系膜切除术后pT1/T2N0中低位直肠癌局部复发和远处转移的危险因素
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr 13;19(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02223-4.
2
Actual survival after resection of primary colorectal cancer: results from a prospective multicenter study.原发性结直肠癌切除术后的实际生存率:一项前瞻性多中心研究的结果
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr 5;19(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02207-4.
3
Analysis of long-term oncological results of clinical versus pathological responses after neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer.
Correlation of Presacral Tumour Recurrence with Tumour Metastasis and Long-Term Tumour Recurrence Risk in Patients with Rectal Cancer.
直肠癌患者骶前肿瘤复发与肿瘤转移及长期肿瘤复发风险的相关性
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Sep 28;2022:6202457. doi: 10.1155/2022/6202457. eCollection 2022.
局部进展期直肠癌新辅助治疗后临床与病理反应的长期肿瘤学结果分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Nov 30;18(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-02094-1.
4
The tip of the iceberg of colorectal perforation from enema: a systematic review and meta-analysis.灌肠致结直肠穿孔的冰山一角:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Nov;24(11):1109-1119. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02294-7. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
5
Effect of understaging on local recurrence of rectal cancer.直肠癌分期不足对局部复发的影响。
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Nov;122(6):1179-1186. doi: 10.1002/jso.26111. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
6
Late anastomotic leakage after anal sphincter saving surgery for rectal cancer: is it different from early anastomotic leakage?直肠癌保肛手术后的晚期吻合口漏:与早期吻合口漏有何不同?
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jul;35(7):1321-1330. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03608-9. Epub 2020 May 5.
7
Diabetes and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: CALGB 80405 (Alliance).转移性结直肠癌患者的糖尿病与临床结局:CALGB 80405(联盟研究)
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019 Oct 17;4(1):pkz078. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkz078. eCollection 2020 Feb.
8
Oncological Outcomes After Anastomotic Leakage After Surgery for Colon or Rectal Cancer: Increased Risk of Local Recurrence.结直肠癌手术后吻合口漏的肿瘤学结局:局部复发风险增加。
Ann Surg. 2022 Feb 1;275(2):e420-e427. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003889.
9
Long-term Oncological Outcomes Following Anastomotic Leak in Rectal Cancer Surgery.直肠癌手术后吻合口漏的长期肿瘤学结果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Jun;63(6):769-777. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001634.
10
Fat clearance and conventional fixation identified ypN0 rectal cancers following intermediate neoadjuvant radiotherapy have similar long-term outcomes.脂肪清除和传统固定术确定的新辅助放化疗后ypN0期直肠癌具有相似的长期预后。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019 Oct 15;11(10):877-886. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i10.877.