• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动头影测量标志点识别的临床适用性:第一部分——与患者相关的识别错误

Clinical applicability of automated cephalometric landmark identification: Part I-Patient-related identification errors.

作者信息

Tanikawa Chihiro, Lee Chonho, Lim Jaeyoen, Oka Ayaka, Yamashiro Takashi

机构信息

Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.

Center for Advanced Medical Engineering and Informatics, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.

出版信息

Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Dec;24 Suppl 2:43-52. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12501. Epub 2021 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1111/ocr.12501
PMID:34021976
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether AI systems that recognize cephalometric landmarks can apply to various patient groups and to examine the patient-related factors associated with identification errors.

SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION

The present retrospective cohort study analysed digital lateral cephalograms obtained from 1785 Japanese orthodontic patients. Patients were categorized into eight subgroups according to dental age, cleft lip and/or palate, orthodontic appliance use and overjet.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An AI system that automatically recognizes anatomic landmarks on lateral cephalograms was used. Thirty cephalograms in each subgroup were randomly selected and used to test the system's performance. The remaining cephalograms were used for system learning. The success rates in landmark recognition were evaluated using confidence ellipses with α = 0.99 for each landmark. The selection of test samples, learning of the system and evaluation of the system were repeated five times for each subgroup. The mean success rate and identification error were calculated. Factors associated with identification errors were examined using a multiple linear regression model.

RESULTS

The success rate and error varied among subgroups, ranging from 85% to 91% and 1.32 mm to 1.50 mm, respectively. Cleft lip and/or palate was found to be a factor associated with greater identification errors, whereas dental age, orthodontic appliances and overjet were not significant factors (all, P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Artificial intelligence systems that recognize cephalometric landmarks could be applied to various patient groups. Patient-oriented errors were found in patients with cleft lip and/or palate.

摘要

目的

确定识别头影测量标志点的人工智能系统是否可应用于不同患者群体,并检查与识别错误相关的患者相关因素。

设置与样本人群

本回顾性队列研究分析了从1785名日本正畸患者获得的数字化侧位头影测量片。根据牙龄、唇腭裂、正畸矫治器使用情况和覆盖情况将患者分为八个亚组。

材料与方法

使用一个能自动识别侧位头影测量片上解剖标志点的人工智能系统。每个亚组随机选取30张头影测量片用于测试系统性能。其余头影测量片用于系统学习。使用α = 0.99的置信椭圆评估每个标志点的识别成功率。每个亚组对测试样本的选择、系统学习和系统评估重复进行五次。计算平均成功率和识别误差。使用多元线性回归模型检查与识别误差相关的因素。

结果

各亚组的成功率和误差各不相同,分别为85%至91%和1.32毫米至1.50毫米。发现唇腭裂是与更大识别误差相关的一个因素,而牙龄、正畸矫治器和覆盖情况不是显著因素(均P < 0.05)。

结论

识别头影测量标志点的人工智能系统可应用于不同患者群体。在唇腭裂患者中发现了以患者为导向的误差。

相似文献

1
Clinical applicability of automated cephalometric landmark identification: Part I-Patient-related identification errors.自动头影测量标志点识别的临床适用性:第一部分——与患者相关的识别错误
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Dec;24 Suppl 2:43-52. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12501. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
2
Clinical applicability of automated cephalometric landmark identification: Part II - Number of images needed to re-learn various quality of images.自动头影测量标志点识别的临床适用性:第二部分——重新学习不同质量图像所需的图像数量。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Dec;24 Suppl 2:53-58. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12511. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
3
Using a New Deep Learning Method for 3D Cephalometry in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.使用一种新的深度学习方法进行唇腭裂患者的三维头影测量
J Craniofac Surg. 2023;34(5):1485-1488. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009299. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
4
Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks:自动识别头影测量标志点:
Angle Orthod. 2020 Jan;90(1):69-76. doi: 10.2319/022019-129.1. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
5
Craniofacial cephalometric morphologies in different cleft types: a retrospective cross-sectional study of 212 patients.不同类型唇腭裂患者的颅面头影测量形态:212 例回顾性横断面研究。
Oral Radiol. 2018 May;34(2):127-135. doi: 10.1007/s11282-017-0290-z. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
6
Accuracy of automated identification of lateral cephalometric landmarks using cascade convolutional neural networks on lateral cephalograms from nationwide multi-centres.使用级联卷积神经网络对来自全国多中心的头颅侧位片进行头颅侧位标志点自动识别的准确性
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Dec;24 Suppl 2:59-67. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12493. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
7
Identification of cephalometric landmarks in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients: are there alternatives for point A, ANS, and PNS?单侧唇腭裂患者头影测量标志点的确定:对于A点、前鼻棘点和后鼻棘点是否有替代方法?
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008 Jan;45(1):81-6. doi: 10.1597/06-236.1.
8
Accuracy and clinical validity of automated cephalometric analysis using convolutional neural networks.基于卷积神经网络的自动头影测量分析的准确性和临床有效性。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2024 Feb;27(1):64-77. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12683. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
9
Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms.锥形束计算机断层扫描头颅定位误差与传统数字头颅定位误差。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Dec;140(6):e289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.024.
10
Reliability and Reproducibility of Landmark Identification in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: Digital Lateral Vis-A-Vis CBCT-Derived 3D Cephalograms.单侧唇腭裂患者地标识别的可靠性和可重复性:数字侧位片与CBCT衍生的三维头影测量片对比
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 2;10(3):535. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030535.

引用本文的文献

1
Can artificial intelligence-driven cephalometric analysis replace manual tracing? A systematic review and meta-analysis.人工智能驱动的头影测量分析能否替代手动描记?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Aug 1;46(4). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae029.
2
Orthodontic Implementation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Some Linear Dental Arch Measurements and Preventing Anterior Segment Malocclusion: A Prospective Study.机器学习算法在预测一些线性牙弓测量值和预防前牙段错颌中的正畸应用:一项前瞻性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Nov 9;59(11):1973. doi: 10.3390/medicina59111973.
3
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Orthodontics: Current State and Future Perspectives.
人工智能在正畸学中的应用:现状与未来展望。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 18;11(20):2760. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202760.
4
Assessment of the quality of different commercial providers using artificial intelligence for automated cephalometric analysis compared to human orthodontic experts.与人类正畸专家相比,评估使用人工智能进行自动头影测量分析的不同商业供应商的质量。
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 May;86(3):145-160. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00491-1. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
5
Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in a Cephalometric Analysis: A Narrative Review.人工智能在头影测量分析中的应用:一项叙述性综述。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 10;13(16):2640. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13162640.
6
Automatic recognition of cephalometric landmarks via multi-scale sampling strategy.通过多尺度采样策略自动识别头影测量标志点。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 20;9(6):e17459. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17459. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Children with Cleft Lip and Palate-A Systematic Review.人工智能和机器学习在唇腭裂儿童中的临床应用——系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 31;19(17):10860. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710860.
8
Where Is the Artificial Intelligence Applied in Dentistry? Systematic Review and Literature Analysis.人工智能在牙科领域的应用现状:系统评价与文献分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 8;10(7):1269. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10071269.
9
Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software.基于深度卷积神经网络的头影测量图像骨骼分类与自动描记软件的比较。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 8;12(1):11659. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15856-6.