Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute for Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Technical Medical Centre, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute for Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Technical Medical Centre, Enschede, the Netherlands; Neurocentrum, Medisch Spectrum Twente MST, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Jul;132(7):1433-1443. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.02.403. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
The electroencephalogram (EEG) is a fundamental tool in the diagnosis and classification of epilepsy. In particular, Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs) reflect an increased likelihood of seizures and are routinely assessed by visual analysis of the EEG. Visual assessment is, however, time consuming and prone to subjectivity, leading to a high misdiagnosis rate and motivating the development of automated approaches. Research towards automating IED detection started 45 years ago. Approaches range from mimetic methods to deep learning techniques. We review different approaches to IED detection, discussing their performance and limitations. Traditional machine learning and deep learning methods have yielded the best results so far and their application in the field is still growing. Standardization of datasets and outcome measures is necessary to compare models more objectively and decide which should be implemented in a clinical setting.
脑电图(EEG)是癫痫诊断和分类的基本工具。特别是,发作间期癫痫样放电(IEDs)反映了癫痫发作的可能性增加,通常通过 EEG 的视觉分析进行评估。然而,视觉评估既耗时又容易受到主观性的影响,导致误诊率很高,从而促使开发自动化方法。自动 IED 检测的研究始于 45 年前。方法范围从模仿方法到深度学习技术。我们回顾了不同的 IED 检测方法,讨论了它们的性能和局限性。传统的机器学习和深度学习方法迄今为止取得了最好的结果,它们在该领域的应用仍在不断增长。数据集和结果测量的标准化对于更客观地比较模型并决定哪些模型应在临床环境中实施是必要的。