Huang Chun-Kai Karl, Wilson Katie, Neylon Cameron, Ozaygen Alkim, Montgomery Lucy, Hosking Richard
Centre for Culture and Technology, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
Curtin Institute for Computation, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
PeerJ. 2021 May 11;9:e11391. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11391. eCollection 2021.
While the movement for open research has gained momentum in recent years, there remain concerns about the broader commitment to openness in knowledge production and dissemination. Increasingly, universities are under pressure to transform themselves to engage with the wider community and to be more inclusive. (OKIs) provide a framework that encourages universities to act with the principles of openness at their centre; not only should universities embrace digital open access (OA), but also lead actions in cultivating diversity, equity, transparency and positive changes in society. This leads to questions of whether we can evaluate the progress of OKIs and what are potential indicators for OKIs. As an exploratory study, this article reports on the collection and analysis of a list of potential OKI indicators. Data for these indicators are gathered for 43 Australian universities. The indicators provide high-dimensional and complex signals about university performances. They show evidence of large disparities in characteristics such as Indigenous employment and gender equity, and a preference for repository-mediated OA across Australian universities. We demonstrate use of the OKI evaluation framework to categorise these indicators into three platforms of diversity, communication and coordination. The analysis provides new insights into the Australian open knowledge landscape and ways of mapping different paths of OKIs.
近年来,开放研究运动虽已兴起,但在知识生产与传播领域,对于更广泛的开放承诺仍存在担忧。大学越来越面临压力,需要进行自我转型,以与更广泛的社区互动并变得更具包容性。开放知识倡议(OKIs)提供了一个框架,鼓励大学以开放原则为核心开展行动;大学不仅应接受数字开放获取(OA),还应引领培养多样性、公平性、透明度以及推动社会积极变革的行动。这引发了我们是否能够评估开放知识倡议的进展以及其潜在指标有哪些的问题。作为一项探索性研究,本文报告了对一系列潜在的开放知识倡议指标的收集与分析。针对澳大利亚的43所大学收集了这些指标的数据。这些指标提供了有关大学表现的高维度且复杂的信号。它们显示出在诸如原住民就业和性别平等这类特征方面存在巨大差异,以及澳大利亚各大学对仓储介导的开放获取的偏好。我们展示了如何运用开放知识倡议评估框架将这些指标归类到多样性、沟通和协调三个平台。该分析为澳大利亚的开放知识格局以及描绘开放知识倡议不同路径的方式提供了新的见解。