• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绘制开放知识机构图谱:对澳大利亚大学的探索性分析

Mapping open knowledge institutions: an exploratory analysis of Australian universities.

作者信息

Huang Chun-Kai Karl, Wilson Katie, Neylon Cameron, Ozaygen Alkim, Montgomery Lucy, Hosking Richard

机构信息

Centre for Culture and Technology, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.

Curtin Institute for Computation, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2021 May 11;9:e11391. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11391. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.11391
PMID:34026359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8121066/
Abstract

While the movement for open research has gained momentum in recent years, there remain concerns about the broader commitment to openness in knowledge production and dissemination. Increasingly, universities are under pressure to transform themselves to engage with the wider community and to be more inclusive. (OKIs) provide a framework that encourages universities to act with the principles of openness at their centre; not only should universities embrace digital open access (OA), but also lead actions in cultivating diversity, equity, transparency and positive changes in society. This leads to questions of whether we can evaluate the progress of OKIs and what are potential indicators for OKIs. As an exploratory study, this article reports on the collection and analysis of a list of potential OKI indicators. Data for these indicators are gathered for 43 Australian universities. The indicators provide high-dimensional and complex signals about university performances. They show evidence of large disparities in characteristics such as Indigenous employment and gender equity, and a preference for repository-mediated OA across Australian universities. We demonstrate use of the OKI evaluation framework to categorise these indicators into three platforms of diversity, communication and coordination. The analysis provides new insights into the Australian open knowledge landscape and ways of mapping different paths of OKIs.

摘要

近年来,开放研究运动虽已兴起,但在知识生产与传播领域,对于更广泛的开放承诺仍存在担忧。大学越来越面临压力,需要进行自我转型,以与更广泛的社区互动并变得更具包容性。开放知识倡议(OKIs)提供了一个框架,鼓励大学以开放原则为核心开展行动;大学不仅应接受数字开放获取(OA),还应引领培养多样性、公平性、透明度以及推动社会积极变革的行动。这引发了我们是否能够评估开放知识倡议的进展以及其潜在指标有哪些的问题。作为一项探索性研究,本文报告了对一系列潜在的开放知识倡议指标的收集与分析。针对澳大利亚的43所大学收集了这些指标的数据。这些指标提供了有关大学表现的高维度且复杂的信号。它们显示出在诸如原住民就业和性别平等这类特征方面存在巨大差异,以及澳大利亚各大学对仓储介导的开放获取的偏好。我们展示了如何运用开放知识倡议评估框架将这些指标归类到多样性、沟通和协调三个平台。该分析为澳大利亚的开放知识格局以及描绘开放知识倡议不同路径的方式提供了新的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/f7108a066906/peerj-09-11391-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/57535d2822ea/peerj-09-11391-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/ab4ddc6101d6/peerj-09-11391-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/6610b3ad3d14/peerj-09-11391-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/d01fb605f4ae/peerj-09-11391-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/673f33da23ee/peerj-09-11391-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/c12530b81c94/peerj-09-11391-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/9b606e0556c2/peerj-09-11391-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/1cdf3e9db6b0/peerj-09-11391-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/7dd3522bc3b0/peerj-09-11391-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/89fbe4ec6a85/peerj-09-11391-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/c94a37f764f6/peerj-09-11391-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/76ddad3e0bbd/peerj-09-11391-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/1592b1a53036/peerj-09-11391-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/9915f7f9e546/peerj-09-11391-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/8859ecb95ddc/peerj-09-11391-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/f7108a066906/peerj-09-11391-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/57535d2822ea/peerj-09-11391-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/ab4ddc6101d6/peerj-09-11391-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/6610b3ad3d14/peerj-09-11391-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/d01fb605f4ae/peerj-09-11391-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/673f33da23ee/peerj-09-11391-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/c12530b81c94/peerj-09-11391-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/9b606e0556c2/peerj-09-11391-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/1cdf3e9db6b0/peerj-09-11391-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/7dd3522bc3b0/peerj-09-11391-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/89fbe4ec6a85/peerj-09-11391-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/c94a37f764f6/peerj-09-11391-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/76ddad3e0bbd/peerj-09-11391-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/1592b1a53036/peerj-09-11391-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/9915f7f9e546/peerj-09-11391-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/8859ecb95ddc/peerj-09-11391-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b205/8121066/f7108a066906/peerj-09-11391-g016.jpg

相似文献

1
Mapping open knowledge institutions: an exploratory analysis of Australian universities.绘制开放知识机构图谱:对澳大利亚大学的探索性分析
PeerJ. 2021 May 11;9:e11391. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11391. eCollection 2021.
2
The development of a new methodology for knowledge sharing in the interface between university and society--an example from the meat sector.新方法论在大学与社会界面知识共享中的开发——以肉类行业为例。
Meat Sci. 2013 Nov;95(3):672-8. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.060. Epub 2013 May 9.
3
Global health equity in United Kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices.英国大学研究中的全球卫生公平性:当前政策与实践概况
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Oct 10;14(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0148-6.
4
Beyond tokenism and objectivity: theoretical reflections on a transformative equity, diversity, and inclusion agenda for higher education in Canada.超越形式主义与客观性:对加拿大高等教育变革性公平、多样性和包容性议程的理论思考
SN Soc Sci. 2022;2(10):209. doi: 10.1007/s43545-022-00509-2. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
5
Open Access uptake by universities worldwide.全球范围内大学对开放获取的采用情况。
PeerJ. 2020 Jul 8;8:e9410. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9410. eCollection 2020.
6
Expanding the actions of Open Government in higher education sector: From web transparency to Open Science.拓展政务公开在高校领域的行动:从网络透明化到开放科学。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 11;15(9):e0238801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238801. eCollection 2020.
7
Alma Ata and health for all by the year 2000. The roles of academic institutions.阿拉木图与2000年人人享有健康。学术机构的作用。
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1991 Jun;5(2):403-16.
8
Imagining the "open" university: Sharing scholarship to improve research and education.畅想“开放”大学:分享学术成果以提升研究与教育水平。
PLoS Biol. 2017 Oct 24;15(10):e1002614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002614. eCollection 2017 Oct.
9
Open access behaviours and perceptions of health sciences faculty and roles of information professionals.健康科学教员的开放获取行为与认知以及信息专业人员的角色
Health Info Libr J. 2015 Mar;32(1):37-49. doi: 10.1111/hir.12094. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
10
Athena SWAN and gender diversity: a UK-based retrospective cohort study.雅典娜 SWAN 和性别多样性:基于英国的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 12;10(2):e032915. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032915.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture.关于何为良好研究文化的范围综述。
F1000Res. 2024 Oct 14;13:324. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.147599.1. eCollection 2024.
2
Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines.研究的透明度:对各学科作者、评审员和编辑的调查。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 8;18(3):e0270054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270054. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the impact of open access policies on research institutions.评估开放获取政策对研究机构的影响。
Elife. 2020 Sep 14;9:e57067. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57067.
2
Open Access uptake by universities worldwide.全球范围内大学对开放获取的采用情况。
PeerJ. 2020 Jul 8;8:e9410. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9410. eCollection 2020.
3
Social media in academics and research: 21st-century tools to turbocharge education, collaboration, and dissemination of research findings.社交媒体在学术和研究中的应用:21 世纪的工具,可加速教育、合作和研究成果的传播。
Histopathology. 2020 Nov;77(5):688-699. doi: 10.1111/his.14196. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
4
Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations.为什么我们选择在特定的地方发表:教师的发表价值观及其与评审、晋升和终身教职期望的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 11;15(3):e0228914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228914. eCollection 2020.
5
More talk than action: gender and ethnic diversity in leading public health universities.空话连篇:领导公共卫生大学的性别和种族多样性。
Lancet. 2019 Feb 9;393(10171):594-600. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32609-6.
6
Authorial and institutional stratification in open access publishing: the case of global health research.开放获取出版中的作者和机构分层:全球卫生研究案例
PeerJ. 2018 Feb 19;6:e4269. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4269. eCollection 2018.
7
The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles.开放获取(OA)的现状:对开放获取文章的患病率和影响的大规模分析。
PeerJ. 2018 Feb 13;6:e4375. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4375. eCollection 2018.
8
SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture.科学标准。促进开放的研究文化。
Science. 2015 Jun 26;348(6242):1422-5. doi: 10.1126/science.aab2374.
9
How do changes to the built environment influence walking behaviors? A longitudinal study within a university campus in Hong Kong.建筑环境的变化如何影响步行行为?香港大学校园的一项纵向研究。
Int J Health Geogr. 2014 Jul 28;13:28. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-13-28.