Zhang Bo, Liu Renwang, Ren Dian, Li Xiongfei, Wang Yanye, Huo Huandong, Zhu Shuai, Chen Jun, Song Zuoqing, Xu Song
Department of Lung Cancer Surgery, Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Metastasis and Tumour Microenvironment, Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Front Oncol. 2021 May 7;11:610638. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.610638. eCollection 2021.
To investigate the differences in survival between lobectomy and sub-lobar resection for elderly stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry.
The data of stage IA elderly NSCLC patients (≥ 70 years) with tumors less than or equal to 3 cm in diameter were extracted. Propensity-matched analysis was used. Lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) was compared among the patients after lobectomy and sub-lobar resection. The proportional hazards model was applied to identify multiple prognostic factors.
A total of 3,504 patients met criteria after propensity score matching (PSM). Although the LCSS was better for lobectomy than for sub-lobar resection in patients with tumors ≤ 3 cm before PSM (p < 0.001), no significant difference in the LCSS was identified between the two treatment groups after PSM (p = 0.191). Multivariate Cox regression showed the elder age, male gender, squamous cell carcinoma (SQC) histology type, poor/undifferentiated grade and a large tumor size were associated with poor LCSS. The subgroup analysis of tumor sizes, histologic types and lymph nodes (LNs) dissection, there were also no significant difference for LCSS between lobectomy and sub-lobar resection. The sub-lobar resection was further divided into segmentectomy or wedge resection, and it demonstrated that no significant differences in LCSS were identified among the treatment subgroups either. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the elder age, poor/undifferentiated grade and a large tumor size were a statistically significant independent factor associated with survival.
In terms of LCSS, lobectomy has no significant advantage over sub-lobar resection in elderly patients with stage IA NSCLC if lymph node assessment is performed adequately. The present data may contribute to develop a more suitable surgical treatment strategy for the stage IA elderly NSCLC patients.
使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)登记系统,调查老年Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者肺叶切除术和肺段以下切除术的生存差异。
提取年龄≥70岁、肿瘤直径小于或等于3 cm的ⅠA期老年NSCLC患者的数据。采用倾向匹配分析。比较肺叶切除术和肺段以下切除术后患者的肺癌特异性生存(LCSS)情况。应用比例风险模型确定多个预后因素。
倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,共有3504例患者符合标准。虽然PSM前肿瘤≤3 cm的患者中,肺叶切除术的LCSS优于肺段以下切除术(p<0.001),但PSM后两个治疗组的LCSS无显著差异(p = 0.191)。多变量Cox回归显示,高龄、男性、鳞状细胞癌(SQC)组织学类型、低分化/未分化分级和肿瘤体积大与LCSS差相关。在肿瘤大小、组织学类型和淋巴结(LN)清扫的亚组分析中,肺叶切除术和肺段以下切除术的LCSS也无显著差异。肺段以下切除术进一步分为肺段切除术或楔形切除术,结果表明各治疗亚组之间的LCSS也无显著差异。多变量Cox回归分析显示,高龄、低分化/未分化分级和肿瘤体积大是与生存相关的统计学显著独立因素。
就LCSS而言,如果充分进行淋巴结评估,肺叶切除术在老年ⅠA期NSCLC患者中并不比肺段以下切除术具有显著优势。目前的数据可能有助于为老年ⅠA期NSCLC患者制定更合适的手术治疗策略。