• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

YouTube 教育视频在前庭康复中的质量、可靠性和人气:一项横断面研究。

The Quality, Reliability, and Popularity of YouTube Education Videos for Vestibular Rehabilitation: A Cross-sectional Study.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Otol Neurotol. 2021 Sep 1;42(8):e1077-e1083. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003197.

DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000003197
PMID:34028400
Abstract

HYPOTHESIS

Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) education videos on YouTube are poor-quality and unreliable.

BACKGROUND

YouTube has become a health information source. Recent studies have determined that videos on YouTube contain misleading and inappropriate information for different medical conditions. The aim of the present study was to assess the quality and reliability of VR education videos.

METHODS

A search was performed using the keywords vertigo, vertigo treatment, vertigo exercise, and vestibular rehabilitation, on YouTube. The first 50 videos for each keyword were analyzed. Videos were divided into four groups according to the video source: Group 1: universities/occupational organizations, Group 2: medical ad/profit-oriented companies, Group 3: independent users, and Group 4: others (news/media/state institution). The quality and reliability of videos were evaluated regarding the modified DISCERN criteria, the modified Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and global quality scores (GQS).

RESULTS

Among the 200 videos analyzed, 103 were included. The main video source was medical ad/profit-oriented companies (60.2%). The mean modified DISCERN criteria score, the mean modified JAMA benchmark criteria score, and the mean GQS value of the videos were found as low (2.46 ± 1.37, 2.09 ± 1.23, and 2.67 ± 1.38, respectively). Videos uploaded by universities/occupational organizations (25.2%) had statistically significant higher modified DISCERN criteria scores, modified JAMA benchmark criteria scores, and GQS values compared with the other groups (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Online information about VR education on YouTube was of poor quality and unreliable. Expert vestibular providers should be aware of these inappropriate sources and educate patients regarding the poor-quality of videos and also aim to provide more quality and reliable sources of information.

摘要

假设

YouTube 上的前庭康复 (VR) 教育视频质量差且不可靠。

背景

YouTube 已成为健康信息来源。最近的研究表明,YouTube 上的视频包含针对不同医疗状况的误导性和不适当信息。本研究旨在评估 VR 教育视频的质量和可靠性。

方法

使用关键字“眩晕”、“眩晕治疗”、“眩晕运动”和“前庭康复”在 YouTube 上进行搜索。分析每个关键字的前 50 个视频。根据视频来源将视频分为四组:第 1 组:大学/职业组织,第 2 组:医疗广告/盈利为目的的公司,第 3 组:独立用户,第 4 组:其他(新闻/媒体/国家机构)。使用改良后的 DISCERN 标准、改良后的美国医学会(JAMA)基准标准和全球质量评分(GQS)评估视频的质量和可靠性。

结果

在所分析的 200 个视频中,有 103 个被纳入。主要视频来源是医疗广告/盈利为目的的公司(60.2%)。视频的平均改良 DISCERN 标准评分、平均改良 JAMA 基准标准评分和平均 GQS 值均较低(分别为 2.46±1.37、2.09±1.23 和 2.67±1.38)。与其他组相比,来自大学/职业组织的视频(25.2%)的改良 DISCERN 标准评分、改良 JAMA 基准标准评分和 GQS 值具有统计学意义上的显著更高(p<0.001)。

结论

YouTube 上关于 VR 教育的在线信息质量差且不可靠。专业的前庭提供者应该意识到这些不合适的来源,并教育患者有关视频质量差的问题,同时还应努力提供更多高质量和可靠的信息来源。

相似文献

1
The Quality, Reliability, and Popularity of YouTube Education Videos for Vestibular Rehabilitation: A Cross-sectional Study.YouTube 教育视频在前庭康复中的质量、可靠性和人气:一项横断面研究。
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Sep 1;42(8):e1077-e1083. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003197.
2
Evaluation of the Quality, Reliability, and Educational Content of YouTube Videos as an Information Source for Soft Contact Lenses.评估 YouTube 视频作为软性隐形眼镜信息来源的质量、可靠性和教育内容。
Eye Contact Lens. 2021 Nov 1;47(11):617-621. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000795.
3
Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.YouTube上关于膀胱输尿管反流的视频分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Dec;17(6):858.e1-858.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
4
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.基于 YouTube 的视频质量控制研究:在线视频资源在颈椎病患者教育中的质量。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
5
An Analysis of the Quality, Reliability, and Popularity of YouTube Videos on Glaucoma.YouTube 上青光眼相关视频的质量、可靠性和普及度分析。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 May-Jun;5(3):306-312. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
6
A quality analysis of nocturnal enuresis videos on YouTube.YouTube 上遗尿症视频的质量分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Aug;17(4):449.e1-449.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
7
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of the Information on Rotator Cuff Repair on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上有关肩袖修复信息的质量和可靠性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Feb;106(1):31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
8
Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study.基于 YouTube 的半月板患者教育在线视频资源质量控制研究:一项质量控制研究。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jan;36(1):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.033.
9
Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube.分析 YouTube 上斜视相关信息的质量、可靠性和普及度。
Strabismus. 2020 Dec;28(4):175-180. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1836002. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
10
Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos as an Information Source for Testicular Torsion.YouTube 视频作为睾丸扭转信息来源的质量评估。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 18;10:905609. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.905609. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing quality and reliability of online videos on tachycardia: a YouTube video-based study.评估心动过速相关在线视频的质量和可靠性:基于 YouTube 视频的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):2620. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20062-2.
2
Quality of Popular Online Resources About Vestibular Migraine.关于前庭性偏头痛的热门在线资源质量
OTO Open. 2024 Jul 15;8(3):e137. doi: 10.1002/oto2.137. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
3
Assessing the Quality and Reliability of Cardiac Rehabilitation Information on YouTube: A Systematic Evaluation.
评估YouTube上心脏康复信息的质量和可靠性:一项系统评价。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 20;16(6):e62752. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62752. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
The quality and reliability of patient education regarding sound therapy videos for tinnitus on YouTube.YouTube上有关耳鸣声音疗法视频的患者教育的质量和可靠性。
PeerJ. 2024 Feb 1;12:e16846. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16846. eCollection 2024.