Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021 Jul;144(1):6-27. doi: 10.1111/acps.13330. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
Several theories propose that visual acuity impairment is associated with psychosis. Visual impairment could lead to psychosis or the converse, or they may share underlying pathology or risk factors. In the first evidence synthesis in this area for over 25 years, we collated studies measuring the association between visual acuity impairment and psychosis.
We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases for studies published from 1992 to 2020, using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale to assess risk of bias. We narratively synthesized findings and meta-analyzed sufficiently homogenous results.
We included 40 papers, which reported on 31 studies. Evidence from seven cohort studies was inconsistent, which precluded meta-analysis of this study design. These contradictory results also made it difficult to draw conclusions regarding a temporal association. We found evidence for an association from eight cross-sectional studies treating visual acuity impairment as the exposure and psychosis as the outcome [pooled odds ratio (OR) =1.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-2.31], and four with the reverse exposure and outcome (OR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.17-2.92). Seven case-control studies with mixed findings were found, but only two primarily addressed our research question, and these findings were mixed.
Although evidence supports a cross-sectional association between visual acuity impairment and psychosis, further research is needed to clarify the temporal direction, given the mixed findings in cohort studies. Understanding the association may give insights into prevention strategies for people at risk of visual acuity impairment and psychosis.
有几种理论认为视力障碍与精神病有关。视力障碍可能导致精神病,也可能相反,或者它们可能具有共同的潜在病理或风险因素。这是 25 年来该领域首次进行的证据综合分析,我们整理了衡量视力障碍与精神病之间关联的研究。
我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO 和 Web of Science 数据库,检索时间为 1992 年至 2020 年,使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险。我们对研究结果进行了叙述性综合,并对足够同质的结果进行了荟萃分析。
我们纳入了 40 篇论文,其中报道了 31 项研究。来自 7 项队列研究的证据不一致,这使得无法对这种研究设计进行荟萃分析。这些相互矛盾的结果也使得难以得出关于时间关联的结论。我们从 8 项将视力障碍视为暴露因素、精神病为结局的横断面研究中发现了关联的证据[汇总比值比(OR)=1.76,95%置信区间(CI):1.34-2.31],而 4 项研究的暴露因素和结局相反(OR:1.85,95% CI:1.17-2.92)。还发现了 7 项具有混合结果的病例对照研究,但只有 2 项主要针对我们的研究问题,而且这些研究结果也是混合的。
尽管有证据支持视力障碍与精神病之间存在横断面关联,但鉴于队列研究的结果不一致,需要进一步研究以明确时间方向。了解这种关联可能为视力障碍和精神病高危人群的预防策略提供思路。