Burgner M
Int J Psychoanal. 1988;69 ( Pt 2):179-87.
Three types of ending in the analyses of adolescents have been discussed: the premature unilateral termination, the mutually agreed ending and the unilaterally interminable analysis. I have concentrated particularly on the third type, illustrating with clinical material the foreclosure in adolescent development. I have suggested that such foreclosure is preceded by developmental distortions from infancy onwards and that these distortions become organized in the breakdown during adolescence. If we return to the starting point of the Congress, Freud's paper 'Analysis terminable and interminable', it seems we still have to assess our potential adolescent patients carefully in terms of the constitutional/instinctual factors, the intensity and degree of internal and external traumata and the developmental strength of the ego which might effectively be mobilized within the analytic experience. But often it is only when we take such adolescents into analysis that we are really able to test their ego capacities for psychic change and for achieving separateness from the analyst and thus from their primary objects of infancy and early childhood.
在对青少年分析的过程中,已经讨论了三种结束方式:过早的单方面终止、双方商定的结束以及单方面无法终止的分析。我特别关注的是第三种类型,并用临床素材来说明青少年发展中的 foreclosure(此处foreclosure未给出中文释义,暂保留英文)。我认为,这种 foreclosure 之前存在从婴儿期开始的发展扭曲,并且这些扭曲在青春期的崩溃过程中变得有组织化。如果我们回到大会的起点,即弗洛伊德的论文《可终止的与不可终止的分析》,似乎我们仍然必须根据体质/本能因素、内部和外部创伤的强度和程度以及在分析体验中可能有效调动的自我发展力量,来仔细评估我们潜在的青少年患者。但通常只有当我们对这样的青少年进行分析时,我们才真正能够测试他们自我改变的能力,以及与分析师分离从而与婴儿期和幼儿期的主要客体分离的能力。