Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Research and Development, Mensura Occupational Health Services, Brussel, Belgium.
Occup Environ Med. 2022 Jan;79(1):63-71. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-107164. Epub 2021 May 25.
Employees in non-healthcare occupations may be in several ways exposed to infectious agents. Improved knowledge about the risks is needed to identify opportunities to prevent work-related infectious diseases. The objective of the current study was to provide an updated overview of the published evidence on the exposure to pathogens among non-healthcare workers. Because of the recent SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks, we also aimed to gain more evidence about exposure to several respiratory tract pathogens.
Eligible studies were identified in MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane between 2009 and 8 December 2020. The protocol was registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42019107265). An additional quality assessment was applied according to the Equator network guidelines.
The systematic literature search yielded 4620 papers of which 270 met the selection and quality criteria. Infectious disease risks were described in 37 occupational groups; 18 of them were not mentioned before. Armed forces (n=36 pathogens), livestock farm labourers (n=31), livestock/dairy producers (n=26), abattoir workers (n=22); animal carers and forestry workers (both n=16) seemed to have the highest risk. In total, 111 pathogen exposures were found. Many of these occupational groups (81.1%) were exposed to respiratory tract pathogens.
Many of these respiratory tract pathogens were readily transmitted where employees congregate (workplace risk factors), while worker risk factors seemed to be of increasing importance. By analysing existing knowledge of these risk factors, identifying new risks and susceptible risk groups, this review aimed to raise awareness of the issue and provide reliable information to establish more effective preventive measures.
非医疗职业的员工可能会以多种方式接触到感染源。为了识别预防工作相关传染病的机会,需要提高对这些风险的认识。本研究的目的是提供一份关于非医护人员接触病原体的已发表证据的最新综述。由于最近的 SARS-CoV-2 爆发,我们还旨在获得更多关于接触几种呼吸道病原体的证据。
在 2009 年至 2020 年 12 月 8 日期间,在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 中检索符合条件的研究。该方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(CRD42019107265)中注册。根据 EQUATOR 网络指南,还应用了额外的质量评估。
系统文献检索产生了 4620 篇论文,其中 270 篇符合选择和质量标准。描述了 37 个职业群体的传染病风险;其中 18 个以前没有提到过。武装部队(36 种病原体)、牲畜养殖场工人(31 种)、牲畜/奶制品生产者(26 种)、屠宰场工人(22 种)、动物护理员和林业工人(均为 16 种)似乎风险最高。总共发现了 111 种病原体暴露。这些职业群体中的许多(81.1%)接触到呼吸道病原体。
许多这些呼吸道病原体在员工聚集的地方(工作场所危险因素)很容易传播,而工人危险因素似乎变得越来越重要。通过分析这些危险因素的现有知识,识别新的风险和易感风险群体,本综述旨在提高对这一问题的认识,并提供可靠的信息,以制定更有效的预防措施。