Temesgen Netsanet, Chekol Bsazinew, Tamirie Tadesse, Eshetie Denberu, Simeneh Nigussie, Feleke Abatneh
Debre Tabor University, College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, Ethiopia.
University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Ethiopia.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Apr 30;66:102356. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102356. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Sedation and analgesia are essential in the intensive care unit in order to promote control of pain, anxiety, prevent loss of materials, accidental extubation and improve the synchrony of patients with ventilator. However, excess of these medications leads to an increased morbidity and mortality, and thus demands protocol.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and the Meta-Analysis Protocol have been used to undertake this review. Pub Med, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar search engines were used to find up-to-date evidence that helps to draw recommendations and conclusions.
In this Guideline and Systematic Review, we have used 16 Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis, 3 Evidence-Based Guidelines and 10 RCT Meta-Analysis, 6 Systemic Reviews of Non-randomized Studies, 8 Randomized Clinical Trials, 11 Cohort Studies, 5 Cross-Sectional Studies and 1 Case Report with their respective study descriptions.
Analgesia, which as a sedation basement can reduce sedative use, is key aspect of treatment in ICU patients, and we can also conclude that an analgesic sedation regimen can reduce the occurrence of delirium by reducing sedatives. The aim of this guideline and the systematic review is to write up and formulate analgesia-based sedation for limited resource settings.
Analgesia and sedation are effective in critically ill patients; however, too much sedation is associated with longer periods of mechanical ventilation and longer duration of ICU stay. Poorly managed ICU patients have a delirium rate of up to 80%, increased mortality, longer hospital stays, higher hospital costs and bad long-term outcomes.
在重症监护病房,镇静和镇痛对于促进疼痛控制、缓解焦虑、防止材料丢失、意外拔管以及提高患者与呼吸机的同步性至关重要。然而,这些药物使用过量会导致发病率和死亡率增加,因此需要制定方案。
本综述采用系统评价和Meta分析方案的首选报告项目。使用PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和谷歌学术搜索引擎查找有助于得出建议和结论的最新证据。
在本指南和系统评价中,我们使用了16项系统评价和Meta分析、3项循证指南和10项随机对照试验Meta分析、6项非随机研究的系统评价、8项随机临床试验、11项队列研究、5项横断面研究和1例病例报告及其各自的研究描述。
镇痛作为镇静基础可减少镇静药物的使用,是ICU患者治疗的关键方面,我们还可以得出结论,镇痛镇静方案可通过减少镇静药物降低谵妄的发生率。本指南和系统评价的目的是为资源有限的环境制定并形成以镇痛为基础的镇静方案。
镇痛和镇静对危重症患者有效;然而,过度镇静与机械通气时间延长和ICU住院时间延长有关。管理不善的ICU患者谵妄发生率高达80%,死亡率增加,住院时间延长,住院费用增加,长期预后不良。