• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

6-11 岁健康儿童 SNIP 测试的可靠性和最佳动作次数。

Reliability of SNIP test and optimal number of maneuvers in 6-11 years healthy children.

机构信息

PneumoCardioVascular Lab/HUOL, Hospital Universitário Onofre Lopes, Empresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares (EBSERH), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.

Departamento de Fisioterapia, Laboratório de Inovação Tecnológica em Reabilitação, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 26;16(5):e0252150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252150. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0252150
PMID:34038470
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8153431/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) is a voluntary inspiratory maneuver measured through a plug occluding one nostril. The investigation of the number of maneuvers necessary to reach the highest peak of SNIP in pediatric populations has been inconsistent. Thus, this study aimed to assess the reliability of SNIP in healthy children aged 6 to 11 years according to sex and age group, and to determine the optimal number of SNIP maneuvers for this age group.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included healthy children with normal pulmonary function. We performed 12 to 20 SNIP maneuvers, with a 30 s rest between each maneuver. The reliability was tested using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), and Bland-Altman analysis for agreement.

RESULTS

A total of 121 healthy children (62 girls [51%]) were included in this study. The ICC and corresponding confidence interval (CI) between the highest measure and the first reproducible maneuver were 0.752 (0.656-0.824), SEM = 10.37 cmH2O, and MDC = 28.74 cmH2O. For children aged 6 to 7 years, the ICC was 0.669 (0.427-0.822), SEM = 10.76 cmH2O and MDC = 29.82 cmH2O; for children aged 8 to 11 years, the ICC was 0.774 (0.662-0.852), SEM = 9.74 cmH2O, and MDC = 26.05 cmH2O. For girls, the ICC was 0.817 (0.706-0.889), SEM = 9.40 cmH2O and MDC = 26.05 cmH2O; for boys, the ICC was 0.671 (0.487-0.798), SEM = 11.51 cmH2O, and MDC = 31.90 cmH2O. Approximately 80% of the total sample reached the highest SNIP before the 10th maneuver.

CONCLUSIONS

SNIP demonstrated moderate reliability between the maneuvers in children aged 6 to 11 years; older children and girls reached the SNIP peak faster. Finally, results indicated that 12 maneuvers were sufficient for healthy children aged 6 to 11 years to achieve the highest SNIP peak.

摘要

背景与目的

嗅吸鼻吸气压力(SNIP)是一种通过堵塞一个鼻孔来测量的自愿吸气动作。在儿科人群中,达到 SNIP 最高峰值所需的动作次数的研究结果并不一致。因此,本研究旨在根据性别和年龄组评估健康 6 至 11 岁儿童的 SNIP 的可靠性,并确定该年龄组的最佳 SNIP 动作次数。

方法

这是一项横断面研究,纳入了肺功能正常的健康儿童。我们进行了 12 至 20 次 SNIP 动作,每个动作之间休息 30 秒。使用组内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误差(SEM)、最小可检测变化(MDC)和 Bland-Altman 分析评估一致性,以测试可靠性。

结果

共有 121 名健康儿童(62 名女孩[51%])纳入本研究。最高测量值与第一次可重复动作之间的 ICC 和相应置信区间(CI)为 0.752(0.656-0.824),SEM 为 10.37cmH2O,MDC 为 28.74cmH2O。对于 6 至 7 岁的儿童,ICC 为 0.669(0.427-0.822),SEM 为 10.76cmH2O,MDC 为 29.82cmH2O;对于 8 至 11 岁的儿童,ICC 为 0.774(0.662-0.852),SEM 为 9.74cmH2O,MDC 为 26.05cmH2O。对于女孩,ICC 为 0.817(0.706-0.889),SEM 为 9.40cmH2O,MDC 为 26.05cmH2O;对于男孩,ICC 为 0.671(0.487-0.798),SEM 为 11.51cmH2O,MDC 为 31.90cmH2O。大约 80%的总样本在第 10 次动作前达到了最高的 SNIP。

结论

SNIP 在 6 至 11 岁儿童中表现出动作之间的中等可靠性;年龄较大的儿童和女孩更快达到 SNIP 峰值。最后,结果表明,对于 6 至 11 岁的健康儿童,进行 12 次动作即可达到最高 SNIP 峰值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a51/8153431/752ab8165a26/pone.0252150.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a51/8153431/7972d55483c5/pone.0252150.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a51/8153431/24a318662f4b/pone.0252150.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a51/8153431/752ab8165a26/pone.0252150.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a51/8153431/7972d55483c5/pone.0252150.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a51/8153431/24a318662f4b/pone.0252150.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a51/8153431/752ab8165a26/pone.0252150.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability of SNIP test and optimal number of maneuvers in 6-11 years healthy children.6-11 岁健康儿童 SNIP 测试的可靠性和最佳动作次数。
PLoS One. 2021 May 26;16(5):e0252150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252150. eCollection 2021.
2
Reliability of maximal respiratory nasal pressure tests in healthy young adults.健康年轻成年人最大呼吸鼻压测试的可靠性。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 29;18(11):e0287188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287188. eCollection 2023.
3
Reliability and acceptability of measuring sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) and peak inspiratory flow (PIF) to assess respiratory muscle strength in older adults: a preliminary study.测量老年人鼻腔吸气压力(SNIP)和吸气峰值流速(PIF)以评估呼吸肌力量的可靠性和可接受性:一项初步研究。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2014 Apr;26(2):171-6. doi: 10.1007/s40520-013-0146-2. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
4
Reproducibility of twitch mouth pressure, sniff nasal inspiratory pressure, and maximal inspiratory pressure.抽搐口压、嗅吸鼻吸气压力和最大吸气压力的可重复性。
Eur Respir J. 1998 Apr;11(4):901-5. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.11040901.
5
Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure in children.儿童的嗅鼻腔吸气压力
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2000 Jun;29(6):468-75. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(200006)29:6<468::aid-ppul9>3.0.co;2-2.
6
Optimal method for assessment of respiratory muscle strength in neuromuscular disorders using sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP).使用嗅吸鼻腔吸气压力(SNIP)评估神经肌肉疾病中呼吸肌力量的最佳方法。
PLoS One. 2017 May 16;12(5):e0177723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177723. eCollection 2017.
7
Reference values of sniff nasal inspiratory pressure in healthy children.健康儿童嗅吸鼻吸气压力的参考值。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Feb;55(2):496-502. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24591. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
8
Effects of diaphragmatic control on the assessment of sniff nasal inspiratory pressure and maximum relaxation rate.膈神经控制对吸气鼻压力和最大松弛率评估的影响。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2016 Jan-Feb;20(1):96-103. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0101. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
9
Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure. A noninvasive assessment of inspiratory muscle strength.嗅吸鼻腔吸气压力。吸气肌力量的无创评估。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Dec;150(6 Pt 1):1678-83. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.6.7952632.
10
Effect of nostril occlusion and mouth sealing in the measurement of sniff nasal inspiratory pressure.测量嗅吸鼻腔吸气压力时鼻孔闭塞和口腔封闭的影响。
Thorax. 2024 Dec 23;80(1):42-44. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2024-221910.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability of maximal respiratory nasal pressure tests in healthy young adults.健康年轻成年人最大呼吸鼻压测试的可靠性。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 29;18(11):e0287188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287188. eCollection 2023.
2
Respiratory Muscle Function in Older Adults with Chronic Respiratory Diseases after Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Subterranean Salt Chambers.地下盐室肺康复后慢性呼吸道疾病老年患者的呼吸肌功能
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 4;12(15):5120. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155120.
3
Optimization of sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) measurement methodology in healthy subjects.

本文引用的文献

1
Reference values of sniff nasal inspiratory pressure in healthy children.健康儿童嗅吸鼻吸气压力的参考值。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Feb;55(2):496-502. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24591. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
2
Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement.肺功能测定标准化 2019 修订版。美国胸科学会和欧洲呼吸学会官方技术声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 15;200(8):e70-e88. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1590ST.
3
ERS statement on respiratory muscle testing at rest and during exercise.
健康受试者嗅吸鼻内吸气压力(SNIP)测量方法的优化。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Feb 15;23(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02348-0.
ERS 关于在休息和运动时进行呼吸肌测试的声明。
Eur Respir J. 2019 Jun 13;53(6). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01214-2018. Print 2019 Jun.
4
Maximal Static Respiratory and Sniff Pressures in Healthy Children. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.健康儿童的最大静态呼吸和嗅探压力。系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Apr;16(4):478-487. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201808-506OC.
5
Respiratory insight to congenital muscular dystrophies and congenital myopathies and its relation to clinical trial.先天性肌营养不良症和先天性肌病的呼吸见解及其与临床试验的关系。
Neuromuscul Disord. 2018 Sep;28(9):731-740. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2018.06.013. Epub 2018 Jul 1.
6
The Applicability of Standard Error of Measurement and Minimal Detectable Change to Motor Learning Research-A Behavioral Study.测量标准误和最小可检测变化在运动学习研究中的适用性——一项行为学研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Mar 22;12:95. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00095. eCollection 2018.
7
The assessment of sniff nasal inspiratory pressure in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy in China.中国杜氏肌营养不良症患者的嗅鼻吸气压力评估。
Brain Dev. 2018 May;40(5):391-396. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
8
Recommendations for a Standardized Pulmonary Function Report. An Official American Thoracic Society Technical Statement.肺功能报告标准化的建议。美国胸科学会技术声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec 1;196(11):1463-1472. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201710-1981ST.
9
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
10
Reference Equation for Respiratory Pressures in Pediatric Population: A Multicenter Study.儿童人群呼吸压力的参考方程:一项多中心研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 20;10(8):e0135662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135662. eCollection 2015.