• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国地区 COVID-19 观测数据的因果图分析揭示了决定因素对报告病例数的影响。

Causal graph analysis of COVID-19 observational data in German districts reveals effects of determining factors on reported case numbers.

机构信息

Central Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany (Zi), Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 27;16(5):e0237277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237277. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0237277
PMID:34043653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8158986/
Abstract

Several determinants are suspected to be causal drivers for new cases of COVID-19 infection. Correcting for possible confounders, we estimated the effects of the most prominent determining factors on reported case numbers. To this end, we used a directed acyclic graph (DAG) as a graphical representation of the hypothesized causal effects of the determinants on new reported cases of COVID-19. Based on this, we computed valid adjustment sets of the possible confounding factors. We collected data for Germany from publicly available sources (e.g. Robert Koch Institute, Germany's National Meteorological Service, Google) for 401 German districts over the period of 15 February to 8 July 2020, and estimated total causal effects based on our DAG analysis by negative binomial regression. Our analysis revealed favorable effects of increasing temperature, increased public mobility for essential shopping (grocery and pharmacy) or within residential areas, and awareness measured by COVID-19 burden, all of them reducing the outcome of newly reported COVID-19 cases. Conversely, we saw adverse effects leading to an increase in new COVID-19 cases for public mobility in retail and recreational areas or workplaces, awareness measured by searches for "corona" in Google, higher rainfall, and some socio-demographic factors. Non-pharmaceutical interventions were found to be effective in reducing case numbers. This comprehensive causal graph analysis of a variety of determinants affecting COVID-19 progression gives strong evidence for the driving forces of mobility, public awareness, and temperature, whose implications need to be taken into account for future decisions regarding pandemic management.

摘要

有几个因素被怀疑是导致 COVID-19 感染新病例的原因。在纠正可能的混杂因素后,我们估计了最显著的决定因素对报告病例数的影响。为此,我们使用有向无环图 (DAG) 作为决定因素对 COVID-19 新报告病例因果效应的假设图形表示。基于此,我们计算了可能混杂因素的有效调整集。我们从公开来源(例如罗伯特·科赫研究所、德国国家气象局、谷歌)收集了德国 401 个地区在 2020 年 2 月 15 日至 7 月 8 日期间的数据,并根据我们的 DAG 分析通过负二项回归估计了总因果效应。我们的分析表明,温度升高、基本购物(杂货店和药房)或在住宅区的公共出行增加、COVID-19 负担衡量的公众意识都有利于减少新报告的 COVID-19 病例。相反,我们看到公共出行在零售和娱乐区或工作场所的增加、谷歌上搜索“corona”的意识、较高的降雨量以及一些社会人口因素对新的 COVID-19 病例的增加产生了不利影响。非药物干预措施被发现能有效减少病例数量。对影响 COVID-19 进展的各种决定因素进行的这种全面因果图分析有力地证明了流动性、公众意识和温度的驱动力,在未来有关大流行管理的决策中需要考虑这些因素的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c2/8158986/b562bdc4b8b3/pone.0237277.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c2/8158986/c288ffa26007/pone.0237277.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c2/8158986/0eb3a67a46f4/pone.0237277.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c2/8158986/21651fb89ca7/pone.0237277.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c2/8158986/b562bdc4b8b3/pone.0237277.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c2/8158986/c288ffa26007/pone.0237277.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c2/8158986/0eb3a67a46f4/pone.0237277.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c2/8158986/21651fb89ca7/pone.0237277.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c2/8158986/b562bdc4b8b3/pone.0237277.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Causal graph analysis of COVID-19 observational data in German districts reveals effects of determining factors on reported case numbers.德国地区 COVID-19 观测数据的因果图分析揭示了决定因素对报告病例数的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 May 27;16(5):e0237277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237277. eCollection 2021.
2
The association of community mobility with the time-varying reproduction number (R) of SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study across 330 local UK authorities.社区流动性与 SARS-CoV-2 时变繁殖数(R)的关联:在英国 330 个地方当局的建模研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Oct;3(10):e676-e683. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00144-8. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
3
Associations of Government-Mandated Closures and Restrictions With Aggregate Mobility Trends and SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Nigeria.政府强制关闭和限制措施与尼日利亚总体流动性趋势和 SARS-CoV-2 感染的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2032101. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32101.
4
Causal Analysis of Impact Factors of COVID-19 in China.中国新冠肺炎影响因素的因果分析
Procedia Comput Sci. 2022;199:1483-1489. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.189. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
5
Local socio-structural predictors of COVID-19 incidence in Germany.德国 COVID-19 发病率的局部社会结构预测因素。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 29;10:970092. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.970092. eCollection 2022.
6
Retracing the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany from a Public Perspective using Google Search Queries Related to "coronavirus".从公众视角出发,利用与“冠状病毒”相关的谷歌搜索查询来追溯德国的 COVID-19 大流行。
Gesundheitswesen. 2021 May;83(5):e9-e14. doi: 10.1055/a-1398-5417. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
7
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
8
Patient characteristics and testing over COVID-19 waves 1 and 2 from the first German COVID-19 testing unit in Munich, Germany.德国慕尼黑首个 COVID-19 检测单位在 COVID-19 第 1 波和第 2 波期间的患者特征和检测情况。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 23;23(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08068-4.
9
Exploring the use of web searches for risk communication during COVID-19 in Germany.探讨 COVID-19 期间德国利用网络搜索进行风险沟通的情况。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 19;11(1):6419. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85873-4.
10
Fueling the Covid-19 pandemic: summer school holidays and incidence rates in German districts.为新冠疫情推波助澜:德国各地区的暑期学校假期和发病率。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2021 Sep 22;43(3):e415-e422. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab080.

引用本文的文献

1
Generalizability of anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence estimates to the Montréal pediatric population: a comparison between 2 weighting methods.抗SARS-CoV-2血清流行率估计值对蒙特利尔儿科人群的可推广性:两种加权方法的比较
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 Apr 8;194(4):1112-1121. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae276.
2
Social determinants of spatial inequalities in COVID-19 outcomes across England: A multiscale geographically weighted regression analysis.英国新冠疫情结果空间不平等的社会决定因素:多尺度地理加权回归分析
SSM Popul Health. 2024 Feb 7;25:101621. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101621. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Human mobility and infection from Covid-19 in the Osaka metropolitan area.

本文引用的文献

1
Socioeconomic inequalities and COVID-19 - A review of the current international literature.社会经济不平等与新冠疫情——当前国际文献综述
J Health Monit. 2020 Oct 9;5(Suppl 7):3-17. doi: 10.25646/7059.
2
Socioeconomic Differences in the Risk of Infection During the Second Sars-Cov-2 Wave in Germany.德国第二波新冠疫情期间感染风险的社会经济差异
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Apr 16;118(15):269-270. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0188.
3
Stay-at-home orders associate with subsequent decreases in COVID-19 cases and fatalities in the United States.
大阪都会区的人员流动与新冠病毒感染情况
NPJ Urban Sustain. 2022;2(1):20. doi: 10.1038/s42949-022-00066-w. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
4
The Effectiveness of Mobility Restrictions on Controlling the Spread of COVID-19 in a Resistant Population.限制流动性对控制具有抵抗力人群中 COVID-19 传播的有效性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 31;20(7):5343. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20075343.
5
Spatial Distribution of COVID-19 Hospitalizations and Associated Risk Factors in Health Insurance Data Using Bayesian Spatial Modelling.利用贝叶斯空间模型在医疗保险数据中分析 COVID-19 住院患者的空间分布及其相关危险因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4375. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054375.
6
Two years of COVID-19 pandemic: The Italian experience of Statgroup-19.新冠疫情两年:意大利Statgroup-19的经验
Environmetrics. 2022 Dec;33(8):e2768. doi: 10.1002/env.2768. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
7
Changes in mobility amid the COVID-19 pandemic in Sapporo City, Japan: An investigation through the relationship between spatiotemporal population density and urban facilities.日本札幌市新冠疫情期间的出行变化:通过时空人口密度与城市设施之间的关系进行调查
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2023 Jan;17:100744. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2022.100744. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
8
Investigating the effects of absolute humidity and movement on COVID-19 seasonality in the United States.研究绝对湿度和运动对美国 COVID-19 季节性的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 6;12(1):16729. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19898-8.
9
Causal connections between socioeconomic disparities and COVID-19 in the USA.美国社会经济差距与 COVID-19 之间的因果关系。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 22;12(1):15827. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18725-4.
10
Effects of the built environment and human factors on the spread of COVID-19: A systematic literature review.建筑环境和人为因素对 COVID-19 传播的影响:系统文献综述。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Dec 1;850:158056. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158056. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
居家令与美国随后 COVID-19 病例和死亡人数的下降有关。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0248849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248849. eCollection 2021.
4
[Higher risk of COVID-19 hospitalization for unemployed: an analysis of health insurance data from 1.28 million insured individuals in Germany].失业者因新冠病毒住院风险更高:对德国128万参保人员医保数据的分析
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Mar;64(3):314-321. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03280-6. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
5
Variation in human mobility and its impact on the risk of future COVID-19 outbreaks in Taiwan.人类流动性的变化及其对台湾未来 COVID-19 爆发风险的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 27;21(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10260-7.
6
Face masks considerably reduce COVID-19 cases in Germany.口罩大大减少了德国的 COVID-19 病例。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 22;117(51):32293-32301. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2015954117. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
7
Evidence That Higher Temperatures Are Associated With a Marginally Lower Incidence of COVID-19 Cases.有证据表明,较高的温度与 COVID-19 病例的发病率略有降低有关。
Front Public Health. 2020 Jul 10;8:367. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00367. eCollection 2020.
8
Physical distancing interventions and incidence of coronavirus disease 2019: natural experiment in 149 countries.物理隔离干预措施与 2019 年冠状病毒病发病率:149 个国家的自然实验。
BMJ. 2020 Jul 15;370:m2743. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2743.
9
Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 among patients in the Oxford Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre primary care network: a cross-sectional study.牛津皇家全科医生学院研究和监测中心初级保健网络中 SARS-CoV-2 患者的风险因素:一项横断面研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;20(9):1034-1042. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30371-6. Epub 2020 May 15.
10
Association between ambient temperature and COVID-19 infection in 122 cities from China.中国 122 个城市的环境温度与 COVID-19 感染的关联。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jul 1;724:138201. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138201. Epub 2020 Mar 30.