DeAngelis Reed T, Frizzelle Brian G, Hummer Robert A, Mullan Harris Kathleen
Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2024 Aug;43(4). doi: 10.1007/s11113-024-09906-2. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
Research on the legacies of historical redlining has lacked nationally representative and multilevel data. We advance this literature by analyzing new data that links historical redlining maps to the residential addresses of participants in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), a diverse and national cohort of adolescents who transitioned to adulthood between the mid-1990s and late 2010s (N=10,897). We report three key findings. First, while most participants did not live within the boundaries of historical redlining maps, Black (22%) and Hispanic (28%) participants were several times more likely than their White peers (8%) to live in either a formerly yellow- or red-lined urban area in adolescence. Second, adolescents who resided in yellow- or red-lined areas also tended to live in the most disadvantaged households and neighborhoods and attained the lowest levels of socioeconomic status in adulthood. Third, Black and White adolescents who lived in rural areas also experienced similar or worse adult outcomes than their peers who lived in redlined urban areas. We also find anomalous but inconclusive patterns for the small group of Black and Hispanic participants who lived in historically affluent "green-lined" areas in adolescence, including poor adult health and high risk of contact with the criminal justice system. Given these findings, we outline avenues for future research that could include historical redlining maps, but also expand beyond urban redlining to consider nonmetropolitan areas and other contemporary indicators of structural racism.
关于历史上红线划定遗留影响的研究一直缺乏具有全国代表性的多层次数据。我们通过分析新数据推进了这一领域的研究,这些新数据将历史红线划定地图与“青少年到成人健康全国纵向研究”(Add Health)参与者的居住地址相联系,该研究是一个多样化的全国性青少年队列,他们在20世纪90年代中期到21世纪10年代后期步入成年(N = 10897)。我们报告了三个关键发现。第一,虽然大多数参与者并不居住在历史红线划定地图的范围内,但黑人(22%)和西班牙裔(28%)参与者在青少年时期居住在曾经被划定为黄色或红色区域的城市地区的可能性是其白人同龄人(8%)的几倍。第二,居住在黄色或红色区域的青少年往往也生活在最弱势的家庭和社区,成年后社会经济地位最低。第三,居住在农村地区的黑人和白人青少年成年后的状况与居住在红线划定城市地区的同龄人相似或更差。我们还发现,对于一小部分在青少年时期居住在历史上富裕的“绿色区域”的黑人和西班牙裔参与者,存在异常但不确定的模式,包括成年后健康状况不佳以及与刑事司法系统接触的高风险。基于这些发现,我们概述了未来研究的方向,这些研究可能包括历史红线划定地图,但也会超越城市红线划定,考虑非都市地区以及结构性种族主义的其他当代指标。