Lara-Velazquez Montserrat, Shireman Jack M, Lehrer Eric J, Bowman Kelsey M, Ruiz-Garcia Henry, Paukner Mitchell J, Chappell Richard J, Dey Mahua
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, UW Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, United States.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
Front Oncol. 2021 May 11;11:662302. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.662302. eCollection 2021.
Immunotherapy for GBM is an emerging field which is increasingly being investigated in combination with standard of care treatment options with variable reported success rates.
To perform a systematic review of the available data to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining immunotherapy with standard of care chemo-radiotherapy following surgical resection for the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM.
A literature search was performed for published clinical trials evaluating immunotherapy for GBM from January 1, 2000, to October 1, 2020, in PubMed and Cochrane using PICOS/PRISMA/MOOSE guidelines. Only clinical trials with two arms (combined therapy control therapy) were included. Outcomes were then pooled using weighted random effects model for meta-analysis and compared using the Wald-type test. Primary outcomes included 1-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), secondary outcomes included severe adverse events (SAE) grade 3 or higher.
Nine randomized phase II and/or III clinical trials were included in the analysis, totaling 1,239 patients. The meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in group's 1-year OS [80.6% (95% CI: 68.6%-90.2%) 72.6% (95% CI: 65.7%-78.9%), p = 0.15] or in 1-year PFS [37% (95% CI: 26.4%-48.2%) 30.4% (95% CI: 25.4%-35.6%) p = 0.17] when the immunotherapy in combination with the standard of care group (combined therapy) was compared to the standard of care group alone (control). Severe adverse events grade 3 to 5 were more common in the immunotherapy and standard of care group than in the standard of care group (47.3%, 95% CI: 20.8-74.6%, 43.8%, 95% CI: 8.7-83.1, p = 0.81), but this effect also failed to reach statistical significance.
Our results suggests that immunotherapy can be safely combined with standard of care chemo-radiotherapy without significant increase in grade 3 to 5 SAE; however, there is no statistically significant increase in overall survival or progression free survival with the combination therapy.
胶质母细胞瘤的免疫治疗是一个新兴领域,越来越多地与标准治疗方案联合进行研究,报道的成功率各不相同。
对现有数据进行系统评价,以评估免疫治疗与手术切除后标准护理放化疗联合用于治疗新诊断胶质母细胞瘤的安全性和有效性。
按照PICOS/PRISMA/MOOSE指南,于2000年1月1日至2020年10月1日在PubMed和Cochrane中检索已发表的评估胶质母细胞瘤免疫治疗的临床试验。仅纳入具有两个组(联合治疗组 对照治疗组)的临床试验。然后使用加权随机效应模型对结果进行汇总以进行荟萃分析,并使用Wald型检验进行比较。主要结局包括1年总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS),次要结局包括3级或更高等级的严重不良事件(SAE)。
分析纳入了9项随机II期和/或III期临床试验,共1239例患者。荟萃分析显示,与单纯标准护理组(对照组)相比,免疫治疗联合标准护理组(联合治疗组)的1年OS[80.6%(95%CI:68.6%-90.2%)对72.6%(95%CI:65.7%-78.9%),p=0.15]或1年PFS[37%(95%CI:26.4%-48.2%)对30.4%(95%CI:25.4%-35.6%),p=0.17]无统计学显著差异。免疫治疗联合标准护理组3至5级严重不良事件比标准护理组更常见(47.3%,95%CI:20.8-74.6%对43.8%,95%CI:8.7-83.1,p=0.81),但这种影响也未达到统计学显著差异。
我们的结果表明,免疫治疗可安全地与标准护理放化疗联合使用,而不会显著增加3至5级严重不良事件;然而,联合治疗在总生存期或无进展生存期方面无统计学显著增加。