NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.
Institute of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London (UCL).
J Glaucoma. 2021 Aug 1;30(8):732-743. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001889.
Multiple questionnaires exist to measure glaucoma's impact on quality of life (QoL). Selecting the right questionnaire for the research question is essential, as is patients' acceptability of the questionnaire to enable collection of relevant patient-reported outcomes.
QoL relating to a disease and its treatment is an important dimension to capture. This scoping review sought to identify the questionnaires most appropriate for capturing the impact of glaucoma on QoL.
A literature search of QoL questionnaires used in glaucoma, including patient-reported outcomes measures, was conducted and the identified questionnaires were analyzed using a developed quality criteria assessment.
Forty-one QoL questionnaires were found which were analyzed with the detailed quality criteria assessment leading to a summary score. This identified the top 10 scoring QoL questionnaires rated by a synthesis of the quality criteria grid, considering aspects such as reliability and reproducibility, and the authors' expert clinical opinion. The results were ratified in consultation with an international panel of ophthalmologists (N=49) from the Educational Club of Ocular Surface and Glaucoma representing 23 countries.
Wide variability among questionnaires used to determine vision related QoL in glaucoma and in the responses elicited was identified. In conclusion, no single existing QoL questionnaire design is suitable for all purposes in glaucoma research, rather we have identified the top 10 from which the questionnaire most appropriate to the study objective may be selected. Development of a new questionnaire that could better distinguish between treatments in terms of vision and treatment-related QoL would be useful that includes the patient perspective of treatment effects as well as meeting requirements of regulatory and health authorities. Future work could involve development of a formal weighting system with which to comprehensively assess the quality of QoL questionnaires used in glaucoma.
有多种问卷可用于测量青光眼对生活质量(QoL)的影响。选择适合研究问题的正确问卷至关重要,因为患者对问卷的接受程度可以使我们收集到相关的患者报告结果。
与疾病及其治疗相关的生活质量是需要捕捉的一个重要维度。本范围综述旨在确定最适合用于捕捉青光眼对 QoL 影响的问卷。
对用于青光眼的 QoL 问卷(包括患者报告结局测量)进行文献检索,并使用制定的质量标准评估对确定的问卷进行分析。
共发现 41 份 QoL 问卷,通过详细的质量标准评估进行了分析,得出了综合评分。根据质量标准网格的综合评分,考虑了可靠性和可重复性等方面以及作者的临床专业意见,确定了前 10 名得分最高的 QoL 问卷。该结果在与来自代表 23 个国家的眼表面和青光眼教育俱乐部的 49 名国际眼科医生小组(N=49)的国际专家小组协商后得到了认可。
在青光眼患者中使用的用于确定与视力相关的 QoL 的问卷以及得出的结果之间存在很大差异。总之,没有一种现有的 QoL 问卷设计适合青光眼研究的所有目的,而我们已经确定了前 10 名,从中可以选择最适合研究目标的问卷。开发一种新的问卷,在视觉和与治疗相关的 QoL 方面能够更好地区分治疗方法,同时还满足监管和卫生当局的要求,将是非常有用的。未来的工作可以包括开发一个正式的加权系统,以全面评估用于青光眼的 QoL 问卷的质量。