Zhang Liwei, Li Huijie, Chen Kelin
School of Public Administration, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Institute of Urban Governance, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Mar 21;8(1):64. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8010064.
Risk communication is critical to emergency management. The objective of this paper is to illustrate the effective process and attention points of risk communication reflecting on the COVID-19 (2019-nCoV) outbreak in Wuhan, China. We provide the timeline of risk communication progress in Wuhan and use a message-centered approach to identify problems that it entailed. It was found that the delayed decision making of the local government officials and the limited information disclosure should be mainly responsible for the ineffective risk communication. The principles for effective risk communication concerning Wuhan's outbreak management were also discussed. The whole communication process is suggested to integrate the accessibility and openness of risk information, the timing and frequency of communication, and the strategies dealing with uncertainties. Based on these principles and lessons from Wuhan's case, this paper employed a simplified Government-Expert-Public risk communication model to illustrate a collaborative network for effective risk communication.
风险沟通对于应急管理至关重要。本文的目的是通过反思中国武汉的新冠疫情(2019 - 新型冠状病毒),阐述风险沟通的有效流程及要点。我们提供了武汉风险沟通进展的时间线,并采用以信息为中心的方法来识别其中存在的问题。研究发现,地方政府官员决策延迟以及信息披露有限应是风险沟通无效的主要原因。本文还讨论了武汉疫情管理中有效风险沟通的原则。建议整个沟通流程整合风险信息的可及性与开放性、沟通的时机和频率以及应对不确定性的策略。基于这些原则以及武汉案例的经验教训,本文采用了一个简化的政府 - 专家 - 公众风险沟通模型来阐述有效风险沟通的协作网络。