• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应激诱导的拟南芥RD29A启动子持续驱动转基因柑橘属植物中甜橙APETALA1和LEAFY的表达以及早熟开花。

Stress-inducible Arabidopsis thaliana RD29A promoter constitutively drives Citrus sinensis APETALA1 and LEAFY expression and precocious flowering in transgenic Citrus spp.

作者信息

Orbović Vladimir, Ravanfar Seyed Ali, Acanda Yosvanis, Narvaez Javier, Merritt Benjamin A, Levy Amit, Lovatt Carol J

机构信息

Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida/IFAS, Lake Alfred, FL, 33850, USA.

Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.

出版信息

Transgenic Res. 2021 Oct;30(5):687-699. doi: 10.1007/s11248-021-00260-z. Epub 2021 May 30.

DOI:10.1007/s11248-021-00260-z
PMID:34053006
Abstract

Transgenic 'Duncan' grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macf.) and 'Valencia' sweet orange (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck) plants ectopically expressing C. sinensis (cv. Washington navel orange) APETALA1 (CsAP1) or LEAFY (CsLFY) genes under control of the Arabidopsis thaliana stress-inducible promoter AtRD29A flowered under non-inductive (warm temperature, well-watered) greenhouse conditions, whereas their wild-type (WT) counterparts did not. The transgenic plants that flowered exhibited no altered morphological features, except the lack of thorns characteristic of juvenile WT plants. The most precocious T0 line, 'Duncan' grapefruit (Dun134-3) expressing the CsAP1 gene, flowered and fruited when it was 4.5 years old and the T1 siblings from this line flowered and fruited when they were just over 18 months old. In contrast, T1 seedlings from three lines of 'Duncan' grapefruit expressing the CsLFY gene flowered within 3 months after germination, but were unable to support fruit development. Transcript levels of corresponding transgenes in leaves were not correlated with earliness of flowering. To further study the activity of AtRD29A, leaves from three 'Carrizo' citrange (C. sinensis × Poncirus trifoliata) rootstock seedlings transformed with the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene under regulation of the AtRD29A promoter were subjected to drought stress or well-watered conditions. Expression of GFP was not stress-dependent, consistent with the observation of flowering of CsAP1 and CsLFY transgenic plants under non-inductive conditions. Taken together, the results suggest that AtRD29A is constitutively expressed in a citrus background. Despite the loss of control over flowering time, transgenic citrus lines ectopically expressing C. sinensis AP1 or LFY genes under control of the A. thaliana RD29A promoter exhibit precocious flowering, fruit development and viable transgenic seed formation. These transformed lines can be useful tools to reduce the time between generations to accelerate breeding.

摘要

转基因“邓肯”葡萄柚(Citrus paradisi Macf.)和“伏令夏橙”甜橙(Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck)植株在拟南芥胁迫诱导型启动子AtRD29A的控制下异位表达中华柑橘(品种为华盛顿脐橙)的APETALA1(CsAP1)或LEAFY(CsLFY)基因,在非诱导性(温暖温度、水分充足)的温室条件下开花,而它们的野生型(WT)对照则不开花。开花的转基因植株除了没有野生型幼龄植株特有的刺外,形态特征没有改变。最早熟的T0代品系,即表达CsAP1基因的“邓肯”葡萄柚(Dun134 - 3),在4.5岁时开花结果,该品系的T1代子代在刚过18个月大时就开花结果。相比之下,三个表达CsLFY基因的“邓肯”葡萄柚品系的T1代幼苗在萌发后3个月内开花,但无法支持果实发育。叶片中相应转基因的转录水平与开花早熟性无关。为了进一步研究AtRD29A的活性,对在AtRD29A启动子调控下用绿色荧光蛋白(GFP)基因转化的三株“卡里佐”枳橙(C. sinensis × Poncirus trifoliata)砧木幼苗的叶片进行干旱胁迫或水分充足处理。GFP的表达不依赖于胁迫,这与在非诱导条件下CsAP1和CsLFY转基因植株开花的观察结果一致。综合来看,结果表明AtRD29A在柑橘背景中组成型表达。尽管失去了对开花时间的控制,但在拟南芥RD29A启动子控制下异位表达中华柑橘AP1或LFY基因的转基因柑橘品系表现出早熟开花、果实发育和可育转基因种子形成。这些转化品系可作为减少世代间隔以加速育种的有用工具。

相似文献

1
Stress-inducible Arabidopsis thaliana RD29A promoter constitutively drives Citrus sinensis APETALA1 and LEAFY expression and precocious flowering in transgenic Citrus spp.应激诱导的拟南芥RD29A启动子持续驱动转基因柑橘属植物中甜橙APETALA1和LEAFY的表达以及早熟开花。
Transgenic Res. 2021 Oct;30(5):687-699. doi: 10.1007/s11248-021-00260-z. Epub 2021 May 30.
2
The vascular targeted citrus FLOWERING LOCUS T3 gene promotes non-inductive early flowering in transgenic Carrizo rootstocks and grafted juvenile scions.血管靶向柑橘 FLOWERING LOCUS T3 基因促进 Carrizo 砧木和嫁接幼年接穗的非诱导性早期开花。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 8;10(1):21404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78417-9.
3
GUS expression in sweet oranges (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) driven by three different phloem-specific promoters.三种不同韧皮部特异性启动子驱动下的甜橙(Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck)中的 GUS 表达。
Plant Cell Rep. 2012 Nov;31(11):2005-13. doi: 10.1007/s00299-012-1312-2. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
4
Cry1Ba1-mediated toxicity of transgenic and to the Asian citrus psyllid .Cry1Ba1对亚洲柑橘木虱的转基因毒性。
Front Insect Sci. 2023 Apr 24;3:1125987. doi: 10.3389/finsc.2023.1125987. eCollection 2023.
5
Expression patterns of flowering genes in leaves of 'Pineapple' sweet orange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] and pummelo (Citrus grandis Osbeck).‘菠萝’甜橙(Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck)和柚(Citrus grandis Osbeck)叶片中开花基因的表达模式
BMC Plant Biol. 2017 Aug 30;17(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12870-017-1094-3.
6
Constitutive expression of Arabidopsis LEAFY or APETALA1 genes in citrus reduces their generation time.拟南芥LEAFY或APETALA1基因在柑橘中的组成型表达缩短了它们的世代时间。
Nat Biotechnol. 2001 Mar;19(3):263-7. doi: 10.1038/85719.
7
Ectopic expression of an FT homolog from citrus confers an early flowering phenotype on trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf.).柑橘中FT同源基因的异位表达赋予了枳(Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf.)早花表型。
Transgenic Res. 2005 Oct;14(5):703-12. doi: 10.1007/s11248-005-6632-3.
8
Biolistic transformation of Carrizo citrange (Citrus sinensis Osb. × Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf.).卡里佐枳橙(甜橙×枳)的生物弹道转化
Plant Cell Rep. 2016 Sep;35(9):1955-62. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-2010-2. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
9
Differences in seasonal expression of flowering genes between deciduous trifoliate orange and evergreen Satsuma mandarin.落叶酸橙和常绿温州蜜柑开花基因季节性表达的差异。
Tree Physiol. 2009 Jul;29(7):921-6. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpp021. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
10
Genome-wide identification and characterization of flowering genes in Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck: a comparison among C. Medica L., C. Reticulata Blanco, C. Grandis (L.) Osbeck and C. Clementina.柑橘属植物开花基因的全基因组鉴定和特征分析:比较药用柑橘、红橘、甜橙和克莱门氏小柑橘。
BMC Genom Data. 2024 Feb 20;25(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12863-024-01201-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Litchi LcAP1-1 and LcAP1-2 Exhibit Different Roles in Flowering Time.荔枝LcAP1-1和LcAP1-2在开花时间上表现出不同作用。
Plants (Basel). 2025 Aug 29;14(17):2697. doi: 10.3390/plants14172697.
2
Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Two Types of Rye Under Low-Temperature Stress.低温胁迫下两种黑麦的比较转录组分析
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2025 Mar 3;47(3):171. doi: 10.3390/cimb47030171.
3
Molecular mechanisms of flowering phenology in trees.树木开花物候的分子机制

本文引用的文献

1
New Plant Breeding Techniques in Citrus for the Improvement of Important Agronomic Traits. A Review.柑橘中用于改良重要农艺性状的新植物育种技术。综述。
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Aug 14;11:1234. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01234. eCollection 2020.
2
Flowering Locus T chimeric protein induces floral precocity in edible citrus.成花素基因嵌合蛋白诱导食用柑橘的花期提前。
Plant Biotechnol J. 2021 Feb;19(2):215-217. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13463. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
3
Regeneration of Plants from Protoplasts Induces Widespread Genome Instability.
For Res (Fayettev). 2023 Jan 16;3:2. doi: 10.48130/FR-2023-0002. eCollection 2023.
4
Identification of the inducible activity in the promoter of the soybean gene exposed to abiotic stress or abscisic acid.鉴定暴露于非生物胁迫或脱落酸下的大豆基因启动子中的诱导活性。
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2023 Jul;29(7):947-957. doi: 10.1007/s12298-023-01342-4. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
5
Characterization of NAC transcription factor NtNAC028 as a regulator of leaf senescence and stress responses.NAC转录因子NtNAC028作为叶片衰老和应激反应调节因子的特性分析。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Aug 15;13:941026. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.941026. eCollection 2022.
6
DNA Demethylation Induces Tree Peony Flowering with a Low Deformity Rate Compared to Gibberellin by Inducing Expression under Forcing Culture Conditions.DNA 去甲基化在促成栽培条件下通过诱导表达诱导牡丹开花,其畸形率低于赤霉素。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jun 14;23(12):6632. doi: 10.3390/ijms23126632.
7
Advances in Citrus Flowering: A Review.柑橘开花研究进展:综述
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Apr 8;13:868831. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.868831. eCollection 2022.
8
Citrus Genetic Transformation: An Overview of the Current Strategies and Insights on the New Emerging Technologies.柑橘遗传转化:当前策略概述及新兴技术见解
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Nov 30;12:768197. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.768197. eCollection 2021.
原生质体再生植物诱导广泛的基因组不稳定性。
Plant Physiol. 2019 May;180(1):78-86. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00906. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
4
The complex architecture and epigenomic impact of plant T-DNA insertions.植物 T-DNA 插入的复杂结构和表观基因组影响。
PLoS Genet. 2019 Jan 18;15(1):e1007819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007819. eCollection 2019 Jan.
5
Transcriptome Profiling to Understand the Effect of Citrus Rootstocks on the Growth of 'Shatangju' Mandarin.转录组分析以了解柑橘砧木对‘砂糖橘’生长的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 12;12(1):e0169897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169897. eCollection 2017.
6
Transcriptomic analysis reveals numerous diverse protein kinases and transcription factors involved in desiccation tolerance in the resurrection plant Myrothamnus flabellifolia.转录组分析揭示了复苏植物扇叶鼠刺中众多参与耐旱性的不同蛋白激酶和转录因子。
Hortic Res. 2015 Jul 22;2:15034. doi: 10.1038/hortres.2015.34. eCollection 2015.
7
Consistent and heritable alterations of DNA methylation are induced by tissue culture in maize.玉米组织培养可诱导DNA甲基化发生一致且可遗传的改变。
Genetics. 2014 Sep;198(1):209-18. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.165480. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
8
Possible involvement of locus-specific methylation on expression regulation of leafy homologous gene (CiLFY) during precocious trifoliate orange phase change process.在早熟枳橙阶段转变过程中,位点特异性甲基化可能参与叶状同源基因(CiLFY)表达调控。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 11;9(2):e88558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088558. eCollection 2014.
9
Progressive 35S promoter methylation increases rapidly during vegetative development in transgenic Nicotiana attenuata plants.在转基因烟草植物的营养生长过程中,35S 启动子的渐进性甲基化迅速增加。
BMC Plant Biol. 2013 Jul 9;13:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-99.
10
Plants regenerated from tissue culture contain stable epigenome changes in rice.通过组织培养再生的植物在水稻中含有稳定的表观基因组变化。
Elife. 2013 Mar 19;2:e00354. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00354.