• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用家庭结构分支过程分析 SARS-CoV-2 大流行中的接触者追踪。

Using a household-structured branching process to analyse contact tracing in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PY, UK.

The Alan Turing Institute, London NW1 2DB, UK.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 19;376(1829):20200267. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0267. Epub 2021 May 31.

DOI:10.1098/rstb.2020.0267
PMID:34053253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8165594/
Abstract

We explore strategies of contact tracing, case isolation and quarantine of exposed contacts to control the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic using a branching process model with household structure. This structure reflects higher transmission risks among household members than among non-household members. We explore strategic implementation choices that make use of household structure, and investigate strategies including two-step tracing, backwards tracing, smartphone tracing and tracing upon symptom report rather than test results. The primary model outcome is the effect of contact tracing, in combination with different levels of physical distancing, on the growth rate of the epidemic. Furthermore, we investigate epidemic extinction times to indicate the time period over which interventions must be sustained. We consider effects of non-uptake of isolation/quarantine, non-adherence, and declining recall of contacts over time. Our results find that, compared to self-isolation of cases without contact tracing, a contact tracing strategy designed to take advantage of household structure allows for some relaxation of physical distancing measures but cannot completely control the epidemic absent of other measures. Even assuming no imported cases and sustainment of moderate physical distancing, testing and tracing efforts, the time to bring the epidemic to extinction could be in the order of months to years. This article is part of the theme issue 'Modelling that shaped the early COVID-19 pandemic response in the UK'.

摘要

我们利用具有家庭结构的分支过程模型,探索接触者追踪、病例隔离和对暴露接触者的检疫策略,以控制 SARS-CoV-2 疫情。这种结构反映了家庭成员之间比非家庭成员之间更高的传播风险。我们探索了利用家庭结构的战略实施选择,并研究了包括两步追踪、回溯追踪、智能手机追踪和根据症状报告而不是测试结果进行追踪在内的策略。主要模型结果是接触追踪与不同程度的身体距离隔离相结合对疫情增长率的影响。此外,我们还研究了疫情灭绝时间,以表明干预措施必须持续的时间段。我们考虑了隔离/检疫的非采用、不遵守规定和接触者随时间推移的回忆下降的影响。我们的研究结果发现,与没有接触追踪的病例自我隔离相比,旨在利用家庭结构的接触追踪策略可以放宽一些身体距离隔离措施,但如果没有其他措施,仍然无法完全控制疫情。即使假设没有输入病例和维持中等程度的身体距离、检测和追踪工作,将疫情消灭也可能需要数月到数年的时间。本文是“塑造英国早期 COVID-19 大流行应对措施的模型”主题特刊的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4f/8165594/ec267e3189d4/rstb20200267f09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4f/8165594/d91aff3f6933/rstb20200267f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4f/8165594/6143984452bc/rstb20200267f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4f/8165594/5e451cf06a22/rstb20200267f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4f/8165594/ac1f64189adc/rstb20200267f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4f/8165594/50812e4dba5a/rstb20200267f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4f/8165594/f0fc617addf1/rstb20200267f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4f/8165594/78d09e139b1c/rstb20200267f07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4f/8165594/42ddd03d50e2/rstb20200267f08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4f/8165594/ec267e3189d4/rstb20200267f09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4f/8165594/d91aff3f6933/rstb20200267f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4f/8165594/6143984452bc/rstb20200267f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4f/8165594/5e451cf06a22/rstb20200267f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4f/8165594/ac1f64189adc/rstb20200267f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4f/8165594/50812e4dba5a/rstb20200267f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4f/8165594/f0fc617addf1/rstb20200267f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4f/8165594/78d09e139b1c/rstb20200267f07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4f/8165594/42ddd03d50e2/rstb20200267f08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4f/8165594/ec267e3189d4/rstb20200267f09.jpg

相似文献

1
Using a household-structured branching process to analyse contact tracing in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.利用家庭结构分支过程分析 SARS-CoV-2 大流行中的接触者追踪。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 19;376(1829):20200267. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0267. Epub 2021 May 31.
2
Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study.隔离、检测、接触者追踪和保持社交距离在不同环境下减少 SARS-CoV-2 传播的效果:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1151-1160. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30457-6. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
3
Engagement and adherence trade-offs for SARS-CoV-2 contact tracing.SARS-CoV-2 接触者追踪中的参与度和依从度权衡。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 19;376(1829):20200270. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0270. Epub 2021 May 31.
4
Determining the optimal strategy for reopening schools, the impact of test and trace interventions, and the risk of occurrence of a second COVID-19 epidemic wave in the UK: a modelling study.确定英国学校重新开放的最佳策略、检测和追踪干预措施的影响,以及发生第二波 COVID-19 疫情的风险:一项建模研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Nov;4(11):817-827. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30250-9. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
5
Impact of delays on effectiveness of contact tracing strategies for COVID-19: a modelling study.新冠病毒接触者追踪策略有效性延迟的影响:建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):e452-e459. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30157-2. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
6
Comparison of Estimated Effectiveness of Case-Based and Population-Based Interventions on COVID-19 Containment in Taiwan.基于病例和基于人群的干预措施对台湾 COVID-19 控制效果的估计比较。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jul 1;181(7):913-921. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1644.
7
SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and transmission risk factors among high-risk close contacts: a retrospective cohort study.SARS-CoV-2 血清流行率和高危密切接触者的传播风险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;21(3):333-343. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30833-1. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
8
Household secondary attack rate of COVID-19 and associated determinants in Guangzhou, China: a retrospective cohort study.家庭二次感染 COVID-19 的发生率及其在中国广州的相关决定因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1141-1150. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30471-0. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
9
On limits of contact tracing in epidemic control.论传染病控制中接触者追踪的局限性。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 18;16(8):e0256180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256180. eCollection 2021.
10
Successful contact tracing systems for COVID-19 rely on effective quarantine and isolation.成功的 COVID-19 接触者追踪系统依赖于有效的隔离和检疫。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 3;16(6):e0252499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252499. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
An agent-based model for household COVID-19 transmission in Gauteng, South Africa.南非豪登省家庭新冠病毒传播的基于主体的模型。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 16;20(7):e0325619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325619. eCollection 2025.
2
Effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions as implemented in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.新冠疫情期间英国实施的非药物干预措施的有效性:一项快速综述。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2025 May 29;47(2):268-302. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaf017.
3
New framework to assess tracing and testing based on South Korea's response to COVID-19.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of backward contact tracing in networks.网络中反向接触追踪的有效性。
Nat Phys. 2021 May;17:652-658. doi: 10.1038/s41567-021-01187-2. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
2
Hospital length of stay for COVID-19 patients: Data-driven methods for forward planning.COVID-19患者的住院时间:用于前瞻性规划的数据驱动方法。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 22;21(1):700. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06371-6.
3
Engagement and adherence trade-offs for SARS-CoV-2 contact tracing.SARS-CoV-2 接触者追踪中的参与度和依从度权衡。
基于韩国对 COVID-19 的应对措施的新框架来评估追踪和检测。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 May 3;24(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09363-4.
4
Non-pharmaceutical interventions to reduce COVID-19 transmission in the UK: a rapid mapping review and interactive evidence gap map.非药物干预措施以降低英国 COVID-19 传播:快速映射综述和交互式证据差距图。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2024 May 29;46(2):e279-e293. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdae025.
5
Looking under the lamp-post: quantifying the performance of contact tracing in the United States during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.在灯柱下观察:量化 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间美国接触者追踪的表现。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 23;24(1):595. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18012-z.
6
Diversity of symptom phenotypes in SARS-CoV-2 community infections observed in multiple large datasets.在多个大型数据集观察到的 SARS-CoV-2 社区感染中症状表型的多样性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 7;13(1):21705. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47488-9.
7
Parameter estimation for contact tracing in graph-based models.基于图模型的接触者追踪中的参数估计。
J R Soc Interface. 2023 Nov;20(208):20230409. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0409. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
8
Effectiveness of testing, contact tracing and isolation interventions among the general population on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review.针对一般人群的检测、接触者追踪和隔离干预措施在降低 SARS-CoV-2 传播方面的有效性:系统评价。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023 Oct 9;381(2257):20230131. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0131. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
9
Assessment of a SARS-CoV-2 population-wide rapid antigen testing in Italy: a modeling and economic analysis study.意大利SARS-CoV-2全人群快速抗原检测评估:一项建模与经济分析研究
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Oct 10;33(5):937-943. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad125.
10
Modelling the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on workplace transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the home-delivery sector.模拟非药物干预措施对家庭配送行业中SARS-CoV-2在工作场所传播的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 May 5;18(5):e0284805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284805. eCollection 2023.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 19;376(1829):20200270. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0270. Epub 2021 May 31.
4
Adherence to the test, trace, and isolate system in the UK: results from 37 nationally representative surveys.英国对检测、追踪和隔离系统的遵守情况:37 项全国代表性调查的结果。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 31;372:n608. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n608.
5
Bidirectional contact tracing could dramatically improve COVID-19 control.双向接触者追踪可显著改善 COVID-19 控制效果。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 11;12(1):232. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20325-7.
6
Underdetection of cases of COVID-19 in France threatens epidemic control.法国新冠病毒病病例检测不足威胁疫情防控。
Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7844):134-139. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03095-6. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
7
Household Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.家庭传播的 SARS-CoV-2:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2031756. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31756.
8
Community prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in England from April to November, 2020: results from the ONS Coronavirus Infection Survey.2020 年 4 月至 11 月英国 SARS-CoV-2 社区流行率:来自 ONS 冠状病毒感染调查的结果。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Jan;6(1):e30-e38. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30282-6. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
9
Implication of backward contact tracing in the presence of overdispersed transmission in COVID-19 outbreaks.在新冠疫情中存在过度分散传播的情况下反向接触者追踪的意义。
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Mar 31;5:239. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16344.3. eCollection 2020.
10
Epidemiological changes on the Isle of Wight after the launch of the NHS Test and Trace programme: a preliminary analysis.NHS Test and Trace 项目推出后,怀特岛的流行病学变化:初步分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Dec;2(12):e658-e666. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30241-7. Epub 2020 Oct 14.