Brocard Eva, Reveiz Ludovic, Régnaux Jean-Philippe, Abdala Veronica, Ramón-Pardo Pilar, Del Rio Bueno Ana
Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Santé Publique (EHESP) Rennes France Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Santé Publique (EHESP), Rennes, France.
Pan American Health Organization Washington, D.C. United States of America Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021 May 26;45:e62. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2021.62. eCollection 2021.
To map the current evidence on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) administration and identify knowledge gaps in the literature available in this field.
The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, and Health Systems Evidence databases were searched from January 2015 to March 2020 for systematic reviews published in English, French, Portuguese, and Spanish.
Eighty-three systematic reviews were included, the quality of the reviews was assessed using AMSTAR 2, and data were extracted for all primary outcomes. Perioperative antibiotic administration, the use of first generation cephalosporins, and surgical site infection (SSI) were the most commonly reported for timing of antibiotic administration, drug class, and primary outcome, respectively. Findings showed that, overall, SAP may reduce SSIs compared with a placebo or with no SAP. Results suggested that intraoperative SAP may lower SSI, while postoperative SAP did not show a statistically significant difference.
Findings have confirmed the role of SAP in reducing postoperative SSI across various surgeries and do not support the use of antibiotics after surgery to prevent infections. The findings of this scoping review have enhanced the evidence base that can inform decisions regarding the development of global guidelines for the prevention of SSI. However, high-quality systematic reviews and research reflecting diverse populations and settings are needed.
梳理目前关于外科手术抗生素预防(SAP)应用的证据,并找出该领域现有文献中的知识空白。
检索2015年1月至2020年3月期间PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Epistemonikos和卫生系统证据数据库中以英文、法文、葡萄牙文和西班牙文发表的系统评价。
纳入了83篇系统评价,使用AMSTAR 2评估评价质量,并提取所有主要结局的数据。围手术期抗生素应用、第一代头孢菌素的使用以及手术部位感染(SSI)分别是抗生素给药时间、药物类别和主要结局中最常报告的内容。研究结果表明,总体而言,与安慰剂或不进行SAP相比,SAP可能会降低SSI。结果表明,术中SAP可能会降低SSI,而术后SAP未显示出统计学上的显著差异。
研究结果证实了SAP在各类手术中降低术后SSI方面的作用,不支持术后使用抗生素预防感染。本范围综述的结果加强了证据基础,可为制定全球SSI预防指南的决策提供参考。然而,需要高质量的系统评价和反映不同人群及环境的研究。