Department of Cardiology, Functional and Ultrasound Diagnostics of N.V. Sklifosovsky, Institute for Clinical Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Research Center "Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare", I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 19;21(10):3525. doi: 10.3390/s21103525.
The availability of simple, accurate, and affordable cuffless blood pressure (BP) devices has the potential to greatly increase the compliance with measurement recommendations and the utilization of BP measurements for BP telemonitoring. The aim of this study is to evaluate the correlation between findings from routine BP measurements using a conventional sphygmomanometer with the results from a portable ECG monitor combined with photoplethysmography (PPG) for pulse wave registration in patients with arterial hypertension.
The study included 500 patients aged 32-88 years (mean 64 ± 7.9 years). Mean values from three routine BP measurements by a sphygmomanometer with cuff were selected for comparison; within one minute after the last measurement, an electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded for 3 min in the standard lead I using a smartphone-case based single-channel ECG monitor (CardioQVARK-limited responsibility company "L-CARD", Moscow, Russia) simultaneously with a PPG pulse wave recording. Using a combination of the heart signal with the PPG, levels of systolic and diastolic BP were determined based on machine learning using a previously developed and validated algorithm and were compared with sphygmomanometer results.
According to the Bland-Altman analysis, SD for systolic BP was 3.63, and bias was 0.32 for systolic BP. SD was 2.95 and bias was 0.61 for diastolic BP. The correlation between the results from the sphygmomanometer and the cuffless method was 0.89 ( = 0.001) for systolic and 0.87 ( = 0.002) for diastolic BP.
Blood pressure measurements on a smartphone-case without a cuff are encouraging. However, further research is needed to improve the accuracy and reliability of clinical use in the majority of patients.
简单、准确、经济实惠的无袖带血压(BP)设备的出现,有可能极大地提高血压测量的依从性和利用血压测量进行远程血压监测。本研究旨在评估常规袖带血压测量与使用便携式心电图监测器结合光电容积脉搏波描记法(PPG)记录脉搏波的结果在动脉高血压患者中的相关性。
该研究纳入了 500 名年龄在 32-88 岁(平均 64±7.9 岁)的患者。选择三个常规袖带血压测量的平均值进行比较;在最后一次测量后一分钟内,使用基于智能手机外壳的单通道心电图监测器(俄罗斯莫斯科 L-CARD 有限责任公司的 CardioQVARK)在标准导联 I 中记录 3 分钟的心电图(ECG),同时记录 PPG 脉搏波。使用心信号与 PPG 的组合,基于使用先前开发和验证的算法的机器学习来确定收缩压和舒张压水平,并与血压计结果进行比较。
根据 Bland-Altman 分析,收缩压的标准差为 3.63,收缩压的偏差为 0.32。舒张压的标准差为 2.95,偏差为 0.61。血压计和无袖带方法的结果之间的相关性为 0.89(=0.001),收缩压为 0.87(=0.002),舒张压为 0.87。
使用无袖带的智能手机外壳进行血压测量令人鼓舞。然而,需要进一步的研究来提高在大多数患者中临床应用的准确性和可靠性。