Rzymski Piotr, Perek Bartłomiej, Flisiak Robert
Department of Environmental Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznań, Poland.
Integrated Science Association (ISA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), 60-806 Poznań, Poland.
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 May 27;9(6):559. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9060559.
The rollout of COVID-19 vaccines brings hope for successful pandemic mitigation and getting the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 under control. The vaccines authorized in Europe displayed a good safety profile in the clinical trials. However, during their post-authorization use, unusual thrombotic events associated with thrombocytopenia have rarely been reported for vector vaccines. This led to the temporary suspension of the AZD1222 vaccine (Oxford/AstraZeneca) in various European countries and the Ad26.COV2 vaccine (Janssen/Johnson&Johnson) in the United States, with regulatory bodies launching investigations into potential causal associations. The thromboembolic reactions were also rarely reported after mRNA vaccines. The exact cause of these adverse effects remains to be elucidated. The present paper outlines the hypotheses on the mechanisms behind the very rare thrombotic thrombocytopenia reported after the COVID-19 vaccination, along with currently existing evidence and future research prospects. The following are discussed: (i) the role of antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4), (ii) the direct interaction between adenoviral vector and platelets, (iii) the cross-reactivity of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with PF4, (iv) cross-reactivity of anti-adenovirus antibodies and PF4, (v) interaction between spike protein and platelets, (vi) the platelet expression of spike protein and subsequent immune response, and (vii) the platelet expression of other adenoviral proteins and subsequent reactions. It is also plausible that thrombotic thrombocytopenia after the COVID-19 vaccine is multifactorial. The elucidation of the causes of these adverse events is pivotal in taking precautionary measures and managing vaccine hesitancy. It needs to be stressed, however, that the reported cases are currently sporadic and that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines vastly outweigh their potential risks.
新冠疫苗的推出为成功缓解疫情和控制严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)传播带来了希望。在欧洲获批使用的疫苗在临床试验中显示出良好的安全性。然而,在疫苗获批后的使用过程中,载体疫苗极少报告与血小板减少相关的异常血栓形成事件。这导致欧洲多个国家暂时停用阿斯利康公司的AZD1222疫苗以及美国强生公司的Ad26.COV2疫苗,监管机构对潜在的因果关联展开调查。信使核糖核酸(mRNA)疫苗接种后也极少报告血栓栓塞反应。这些不良反应的确切原因仍有待阐明。本文概述了关于新冠疫苗接种后报告的极为罕见的血栓性血小板减少症背后机制的假说,以及目前现有的证据和未来的研究前景。讨论内容如下:(i)抗血小板因子4(PF4)抗体的作用;(ii)腺病毒载体与血小板之间的直接相互作用;(iii)抗SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白抗体与PF4的交叉反应性;(iv)抗腺病毒抗体与PF4的交叉反应性;(v)刺突蛋白与血小板之间的相互作用;(vi)刺突蛋白在血小板上的表达及随后的免疫反应;(vii)其他腺病毒蛋白在血小板上的表达及随后的反应。新冠疫苗接种后的血栓性血小板减少症也可能是多因素导致的。阐明这些不良事件的原因对于采取预防措施和应对疫苗犹豫至关重要。然而,需要强调的是,目前报告的病例是散发性的,而且新冠疫苗的益处远远超过其潜在风险。