• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对新冠疫苗的认知与态度:波兰的一项横断面研究

The Perception and Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccines: A Cross-Sectional Study in Poland.

作者信息

Rzymski Piotr, Zeyland Joanna, Poniedziałek Barbara, Małecka Ilona, Wysocki Jacek

机构信息

Department of Environmental Medicine, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznań, Poland.

Integrated Science Association (ISA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), 60-806 Poznań, Poland.

出版信息

Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Apr 14;9(4):382. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9040382.

DOI:10.3390/vaccines9040382
PMID:33919672
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8069794/
Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is a major threat to the success of COVID-19 vaccination programs. The present cross-sectional online survey of adult Poles ( = 1020) expressing a willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine was conducted between February and March 2021 and aimed to assess (i) the general trust in different types of vaccines, (ii) the level of acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccines already in use in Poland (BNT162b2 by BioNTech/Pfizer, mRNA-1273 by Moderna and AZD1222 by Oxford/AstraZeneca) as well as eight vaccines approved outside European Union (EU) or in advanced stages of clinical trials, (iii) level of fear of vaccination against COVID-19, and (iv) main sources of information on COVID-19 vaccination. Among all major vaccine technology, the highest level of trust was observed for the mRNA platform, with a considerable number of surveyed (>20%) not aware of the existence of vaccines produced using the traditional approach (inactivated and live attenuated vaccines). The age of participants was the main factor differentiating the level of trust in a particular vaccine type. Both BNT162b and mRNA-1273 received a high level of acceptance, contrary to AZD1222. From eight vaccines unauthorized in the EU at the moment of study, the CVnCoV (mRNA; CureVac) was met with the highest level of trust, followed by Ad26.COV2.S (vector; Janssen/Johnson&Johnson) and NVX-CoV2373 (protein; Novavax). Sputnik V (vector; Gamaleya Research Institute) was decidedly the least trusted vaccine. The median level of fear (measured by the 10-point Likert-type scale) in the studied group was 4.0, mostly related to the risk of serious allergic reactions, other severe adverse events and unknown long-term effects of vaccination. Female, individuals with a lower level of education and those not seeking any information on the COVID-19 vaccines revealed a higher fear of vaccination. Experts' materials were the major source of information on COVID-19 vaccines in the studied group. The study shows the level of trust in COVID-19 vaccines can vary much across the producers while the mRNA vaccines are received with a high level of acceptance. It also emphasizes the need for effective and continuous science communication when fighting the pandemic as it may be an ideal time to increase the general awareness of vaccines.

摘要

疫苗犹豫是新冠疫苗接种计划成功实施的重大威胁。本次针对1020名表示愿意接种新冠疫苗的成年波兰人的横断面在线调查于2021年2月至3月进行,旨在评估:(i)对不同类型疫苗的总体信任度;(ii)波兰已使用的新冠疫苗(BioNTech/辉瑞的BNT162b2、莫德纳的mRNA-1273和牛津/阿斯利康的AZD1222)以及欧盟以外已获批或处于临床试验后期的八种疫苗的接受程度;(iii)对新冠疫苗接种的恐惧程度;(iv)新冠疫苗接种信息的主要来源。在所有主要疫苗技术中,对mRNA平台的信任度最高,相当一部分受访者(>20%)不知道使用传统方法(灭活疫苗和减毒活疫苗)生产的疫苗的存在。参与者的年龄是区分对特定疫苗类型信任程度的主要因素。与AZD1222不同,BNT162b和mRNA-1273都获得了较高的接受度。在研究时欧盟尚未批准的八种疫苗中,CVnCoV(mRNA;CureVac)获得的信任度最高,其次是Ad26.COV2.S(载体;杨森/强生)和NVX-CoV2373(蛋白质;诺瓦瓦克斯)。卫星V(载体;加马列亚研究所)无疑是最不受信任的疫苗。研究组的恐惧中位数水平(用10分制李克特量表衡量)为4.0,主要与严重过敏反应、其他严重不良事件以及疫苗未知的长期影响风险有关。女性、受教育程度较低的个体以及那些不寻求任何新冠疫苗信息的人对疫苗接种的恐惧更高。专家资料是研究组中新冠疫苗信息的主要来源。该研究表明,不同生产商生产的新冠疫苗的信任度可能有很大差异,而mRNA疫苗获得了较高的接受度。它还强调,在抗击疫情时需要进行有效且持续的科学传播,因为这可能是提高公众对疫苗总体认识的理想时机。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118a/8069794/e00ceb1a89fc/vaccines-09-00382-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118a/8069794/c01bb3e7976c/vaccines-09-00382-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118a/8069794/e00ceb1a89fc/vaccines-09-00382-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118a/8069794/c01bb3e7976c/vaccines-09-00382-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118a/8069794/e00ceb1a89fc/vaccines-09-00382-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Perception and Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccines: A Cross-Sectional Study in Poland.对新冠疫苗的认知与态度:波兰的一项横断面研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Apr 14;9(4):382. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9040382.
2
Willingness to Receive the Booster COVID-19 Vaccine Dose in Poland.波兰民众接种新冠病毒加强针的意愿。
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Nov 5;9(11):1286. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9111286.
3
Comparing the human milk antibody response after vaccination with four COVID-19 vaccines: A prospective, longitudinal cohort study in the Netherlands.比较四种新冠疫苗接种后母乳中的抗体反应:荷兰一项前瞻性纵向队列研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 May;47:101393. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101393. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech, and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) Vaccines in Preventing COVID-19 Hospitalizations Among Adults Without Immunocompromising Conditions - United States, March-August 2021.2021年3月至8月美国Moderna、辉瑞-生物科技公司和杨森(强生)疫苗在预防无免疫功能低下状况成年人新冠病毒肺炎住院方面的比较效果
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Sep 24;70(38):1337-1343. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7038e1.
5
Transverse Myelitis Following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: A Pharmacoepidemiological Study in the World Health Organization's Database.接种 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗后出现横贯性脊髓炎:世界卫生组织数据库中的药物流行病学研究。
Ann Neurol. 2022 Dec;92(6):1080-1089. doi: 10.1002/ana.26494. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
6
Persistence of immune response in heterologous COVID vaccination schedules in the Com-COV2 study - A single-blind, randomised trial incorporating mRNA, viral-vector and protein-adjuvant vaccines.Com-COV2 研究中异源 COVID 疫苗接种方案中的免疫应答持久性 - 一项纳入 mRNA、病毒载体和蛋白佐剂疫苗的单盲、随机试验。
J Infect. 2023 Jun;86(6):574-583. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2023.03.027. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
7
Immunogenicity, safety, and reactogenicity of heterologous COVID-19 primary vaccination incorporating mRNA, viral-vector, and protein-adjuvant vaccines in the UK (Com-COV2): a single-blind, randomised, phase 2, non-inferiority trial.在英国(Com-COV2)进行的包含 mRNA、病毒载体和蛋白佐剂疫苗的异源 COVID-19 初级疫苗接种的免疫原性、安全性和反应原性:一项单盲、随机、2 期、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2022 Jan 1;399(10319):36-49. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02718-5. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
8
Comparison of reporting rates of arthritis and arthralgia following AstraZeneca, Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Janssen vaccine administration against SARS-CoV-2 in 2021: analysis of European pharmacovigilance large-scale data.2021 年阿斯利康、辉瑞-生物科技、莫德纳和杨森公司 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗接种后关节炎和关节痛报告率的比较:欧洲药物警戒大规模数据分析。
Rheumatol Int. 2024 Feb;44(2):273-281. doi: 10.1007/s00296-023-05512-1. Epub 2023 Dec 24.
9
Thromboembolic Events after COVID-19 Vaccination: An Italian Retrospective Real-World Safety Study.新冠疫苗接种后的血栓栓塞事件:一项意大利回顾性真实世界安全性研究。
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Oct 10;11(10):1575. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11101575.
10
Use of COVID-19 Vaccines After Reports of Adverse Events Among Adult Recipients of Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) and mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna): Update from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, July 2021.在报告 Janssen(强生)和 mRNA COVID-19 疫苗(辉瑞-生物科技和莫德纳)成年受种者发生不良事件后使用 COVID-19 疫苗:免疫实践咨询委员会的更新-美国,2021 年 7 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Aug 13;70(32):1094-1099. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7032e4.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among People Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus.感染人类免疫缺陷病毒者中COVID-19疫苗接种率的决定因素
J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2025 Jan-Dec;24:23259582251328861. doi: 10.1177/23259582251328861. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
2
Direct and Indirect Effects of Risk Perception and Risk Information on PTSD in Frontline Healthcare Workers.风险认知与风险信息对一线医护人员创伤后应激障碍的直接和间接影响
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2025 Mar 21;21:663-676. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S491046. eCollection 2025.
3
Perception of COVID-19 Vaccination and Uptake Willingness in Northern Nigeria: Understanding Strategies to Optimize Coverage.

本文引用的文献

1
Covid-19: European countries suspend use of Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine after reports of blood clots.新冠疫情:有报道称出现血栓后,欧洲多国暂停使用牛津-阿斯利康疫苗。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 11;372:n699. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n699.
2
Are COVID-19 vaccines safe in pregnancy?孕妇接种 COVID-19 疫苗安全吗?
Nat Rev Immunol. 2021 Apr;21(4):200-201. doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00525-y.
3
Vaccine hesitancy: Beliefs and barriers associated with COVID-19 vaccination among Egyptian medical students.疫苗犹豫:埃及医学生对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的信念和障碍。
尼日利亚北部对新冠疫苗接种的认知及接种意愿:了解优化疫苗接种覆盖率的策略
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 23;22(2):153. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020153.
4
Evaluating the Adverse Effects and Associated Risk Factors of COVID-19 Vaccines Among Healthcare Workers: A Retrospective Study in the Duhok Province, Iraq.评估医护人员中新冠疫苗的不良反应及相关风险因素:伊拉克杜胡克省的一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2024 Oct 17;16(10):e71671. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71671. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Prophylactic and therapeutic vaccine development: advancements and challenges.预防性和治疗性疫苗的研发:进展与挑战。
Mol Biomed. 2024 Nov 11;5(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s43556-024-00222-x.
6
Post-Pandemic Maternity Care Planning for Vaccination: A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Women, Partners, Health Care Professionals, and Policy Makers in the United Kingdom.大流行后产妇疫苗接种护理规划:对英国女性、伴侣、医疗保健专业人员和政策制定者经历的定性研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Sep 11;12(9):1042. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12091042.
7
COVID-19 vaccine preferences for pregnant and lactating women in Bangladesh and Kenya: a qualitative study.孟加拉国和肯尼亚孕妇和哺乳期妇女对 COVID-19 疫苗的偏好:一项定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 14;12:1412878. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1412878. eCollection 2024.
8
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Improves Semen Quality in Men Recovered From COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study.SARS-CoV-2 疫苗接种可改善 COVID-19 康复男性的精液质量:一项回顾性队列研究。
Am J Mens Health. 2024 Jul-Aug;18(4):15579883241264120. doi: 10.1177/15579883241264120.
9
Determinants of COVID-19 vaccination intention in Central and Eastern Europe: A cross-sectional study in Poland, Romania, and Slovenia.中东欧地区新冠疫苗接种意愿的影响因素:在波兰、罗马尼亚和斯洛文尼亚开展的一项横断面研究
Arch Public Health. 2024 Apr 30;82(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01261-0.
10
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Skepticism, Reasons, and Concerns Between Mass Vaccination Centers and General Practices in Germany 2021.2021年德国大规模疫苗接种中心与普通诊所之间对新冠病毒疫苗接种的怀疑态度、原因及担忧比较
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Nov 7;17:2855-2870. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S433331. eCollection 2023.
J Med Virol. 2021 Jul;93(7):4280-4291. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26910. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
4
The race to a COVID-19 vaccine: opportunities and challenges in development and distribution.新冠疫苗竞赛:研发与分发中的机遇与挑战
Drugs Context. 2021 Feb 16;10. doi: 10.7573/dic.2020-12-2. eCollection 2021.
5
Medical students as the volunteer workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic: Polish experience.新冠疫情期间作为志愿者力量的医学生:波兰的经验
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021 Mar;55:102109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102109. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
6
Why did a German newspaper insist the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine was inefficacious for older people-without evidence?为什么一家德国报纸在没有证据的情况下坚称牛津阿斯利康疫苗对老年人无效?
BMJ. 2021 Feb 12;372:n414. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n414.
7
Cross-sectional Assessment of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance Among Health Care Workers in Los Angeles.洛杉矶医护人员对新冠疫苗接受度的横断面评估
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jun;174(6):882-885. doi: 10.7326/M20-7580. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
8
Analysis of the COVID-19 Vaccine Development Process: an Exploratory Study of Accelerating Factors and Innovative Environments.新冠疫苗研发过程分析:加速因素与创新环境的探索性研究
J Pharm Innov. 2022;17(2):555-571. doi: 10.1007/s12247-021-09535-8. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
9
Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA.测量 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息对英国和美国疫苗接种意愿的影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Mar;5(3):337-348. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
10
Safety and efficacy of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine: an interim analysis of a randomised controlled phase 3 trial in Russia.基于 rAd26 和 rAd5 载体的异源初免-加强型 COVID-19 疫苗的安全性和有效性:俄罗斯一项随机对照 3 期临床试验的中期分析。
Lancet. 2021 Feb 20;397(10275):671-681. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00234-8. Epub 2021 Feb 2.