Spivak-Lavi Zohar, Peleg Ora, Tzischinsky Orna, Stein Daniel, Latzer Yael
Department of Social Work, Max Stern, Yezreel Valley College, Yezreel Valley 1930600, Israel.
Education and School Counseling Departments, Max Stern, Yezreel Valley College, Yezreel Valley 1930600, Israel.
Nutrients. 2021 May 31;13(6):1899. doi: 10.3390/nu13061899.
In recent years, there has been a shift in the clinical presentation and, hence, diagnostic definitions of eating disorders (EDs), reflected in a dramatic change in the diagnostic criteria of EDs in the DSM-5. The Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26) is currently considered an accepted instrument for community studies of EDs, although it features an inconsistent factorial structure in different cultures. Therefore, it is essential to investigate whether the EAT-26 can still be considered an adequate instrument for identifying the risk of developing EDs in different cultures. The aim of the present study was to examine the construct validity and internal consistency of the EAT-26.
The study used exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) among different cultural populations in Israel.
Findings indicated different factors in different ethnic groups, most of which do not correspond with the original EAT-26 three-factor structure.
The analysis yielded two main factors among Israeli Jews, four main factors among Israeli Muslim Arabs, and three main factors among Israeli Christian Arabs.
These findings shed light on cultural factors affecting perceptions of the EAT-26 items. This calls for a reconsideration of the generalization of the original three-factor structure of the questionnaire in different cultures.
近年来,饮食失调(EDs)的临床表现发生了变化,因此其诊断定义也有所改变,这反映在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM-5)中饮食失调诊断标准的显著变化上。饮食态度测试-26(EAT-26)目前被认为是用于饮食失调社区研究的一种公认工具,尽管它在不同文化中具有不一致的因子结构。因此,有必要研究EAT-26是否仍可被视为在不同文化中识别饮食失调发病风险的适当工具。本研究的目的是检验EAT-26的结构效度和内部一致性。
该研究在以色列的不同文化人群中使用了探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)。
研究结果表明不同种族群体存在不同的因子,其中大多数与原始的EAT-26三因子结构不相符。
分析在以色列犹太人中得出两个主要因子,在以色列穆斯林阿拉伯人中得出四个主要因子,在以色列基督教阿拉伯人中得出三个主要因子。
这些发现揭示了影响对EAT-26项目认知的文化因素。这就需要重新考虑该问卷原始三因子结构在不同文化中的通用性。