T.K. Baker is senior associate dean for academic affairs and associate professor, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada.
Acad Med. 2021 Sep 1;96(9):1239-1241. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004187.
The discontinuation of the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Skills (CS) in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic marked the end of a decades-long debate about the utility and value of the exam. For all its controversy, the implementation of Step 2 CS in 2004 brought about profound changes to the landscape of medical education, altering the curriculum and assessment practices of medical schools to ensure students were prepared to take and pass this licensing exam. Its elimination, while celebrated by some, is not without potential negative consequences. As the responsibility for assessing students' clinical skills shifts back to medical schools, educators must take care not to lose the ground they have gained in advancing clinical skills education. Instead, they need to innovate, collaborate, and share resources; hold themselves accountable; and ultimately rise to the challenge of ensuring that physicians have the necessary clinical skills to safely and effectively practice medicine.
2020 年,美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第 2 阶段临床技能考试(CS)因 COVID-19 大流行而停止,这标志着围绕该考试实用性和价值长达数十年的争论画上句号。尽管存在争议,但 2004 年实施的第 2 阶段 CS 考试给医学教育带来了深远的变化,改变了医学院的课程和评估实践,以确保学生能够准备并通过该执照考试。尽管该考试的取消受到了一些人的欢迎,但它并非没有潜在的负面影响。随着评估学生临床技能的责任重新回到医学院,教育工作者必须小心谨慎,不要失去在推进临床技能教育方面所取得的成果。相反,他们需要创新、协作和共享资源;承担责任;最终迎接挑战,确保医生具备安全有效地行医所需的临床技能。