Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro. Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
University Hospital Vall d'Hebron. Barcelona, Catalunha, Espanha.
Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 May 28;74(2):e20200720. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0720. eCollection 2021.
to validate the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire regarding cultural aspects and metric properties.
a methodological research carried out through cross-cultural adaptation, face and content validity, dimensional construct and known groups validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency. 511 nurses from four hospitals participated in the study, of which 54 participated in retest.
the instrument validation for Brazilian Portuguese maintained equivalences, according to the original version. The dimensional validity demonstrated adjustment to the tetrafactorial structure of the original version (GFI=0.69). There were statistically significant differences in critical thinking skills between nurses with graduate degrees and who undertook training, reading articles, developing research and working in an institution with a longer time implementation of the Nursing Process. The instrument showed temporal stability (ICC 073-0.84; p<0.001) and adequate internal consistency (α=0.97).
the instrument proved to be valid and reliable for the studied population.
验证《临床实践中的护理批判性思维问卷》在文化方面和计量特性方面的有效性。
通过跨文化适应性、表面和内容有效性、维度构建和已知群体有效性、测试-重测可靠性和内部一致性进行方法学研究。来自四家医院的 511 名护士参与了这项研究，其中 54 名护士参与了重测。
该工具在巴西葡萄牙语的验证中保持了与原始版本的等效性。维度有效性表明，该工具适应了原始版本的四因素结构（GFI=0.69）。具有研究生学历和接受过培训、阅读文章、开展研究以及在实施护理过程时间较长的机构工作的护士之间，批判性思维技能存在统计学上的显著差异。该工具具有时间稳定性（ICC 073-0.84；p<0.001）和足够的内部一致性（α=0.97）。
该工具在研究人群中被证明是有效和可靠的。
