• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年心力衰竭患者团体访视对预先医疗照护计划结果的影响:初步数据。

Impact of group visits for older patients with heart failure on advance care planning outcomes: Preliminary data.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.

UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Oct;69(10):2908-2915. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17283. Epub 2021 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.17283
PMID:34077563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8497395/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Advance care planning (ACP) is critically important for heart failure patients, yet important challenges exist. Group visits can be a helpful way to engage patients and caregivers in identifying values and preferences for future care in a resource-efficient way. We sought to evaluate the impact of group visits for ACP among older adults with heart failure and their caregivers on ACP-related outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed-methods pilot study evaluating the impact of an ACP group visit for older adults with heart failure and their caregivers on ACP-related outcomes including readiness and self-efficacy. The evidence-based PREPARE for Your Care video-based intervention was used to guide the group visits. Twenty patients and 10 caregivers attended one of the five 90-min group visits led by a trained facilitator. Group visit participants completed pre-, post-, and 1-month follow-up surveys using validated 5-point ACP readiness and self-efficacy scales. Qualitative feedback obtained within 3 days of a group visit was analyzed using a directed content analysis.

RESULTS

Patient participants had a median age of 78 years. Approximately half were female while caregiver participants were mostly female. Participants were predominantly white. Patient readiness scores improved significantly pre-to-post (+0.53; p = 0.002) but was not sustained at 1-month follow-up. Patient and caregiver self-efficacy showed some improvement pre-to-post but was also not sustained at follow-up. Interviews revealed positive impacts of group visits across the three themes: encouraging reviewing or revisiting prior ACP activities, motivating patients to take direct steps towards ACP, and serving as a "wake-up" call to action.

CONCLUSIONS

Disease-focused group visits may have a short-term effect on ACP outcomes but ongoing touchpoints are likely necessary to sustain ACP over time. The results highlight a need for follow-up ACP conversations after a single group visit. Timing for follow-ups and the ideal person to follow-up ACP conversations needs to be explored.

摘要

目的

预先医疗照护计划(ACP)对心力衰竭患者至关重要,但仍存在重要挑战。小组访问可以帮助以资源高效的方式让患者及其照护者参与确定未来护理的价值观和偏好。我们旨在评估针对心力衰竭老年患者及其照护者的 ACP 小组访问对 ACP 相关结果的影响。

方法

我们进行了一项混合方法试点研究,评估了针对心力衰竭老年患者及其照护者的 ACP 小组访问对 ACP 相关结果(包括准备度和自我效能感)的影响。使用基于证据的 PREPARE for Your Care 视频干预来指导小组访问。由经过培训的主持人领导的五场 90 分钟小组访问共吸引了 20 名患者和 10 名照护者参加。小组访问参与者使用经过验证的 5 分制 ACP 准备度和自我效能感量表完成了预访、随访和 1 个月随访调查。在小组访问后 3 天内收集的定性反馈使用定向内容分析进行分析。

结果

患者参与者的中位年龄为 78 岁。大约一半是女性,而照护者参与者主要是女性。参与者主要是白人。患者准备度评分在预访和随访之间显著提高(+0.53;p=0.002),但在 1 个月随访时未维持。患者和照护者自我效能感在预访和随访之间有所提高,但也未维持。访谈揭示了小组访问在三个主题方面的积极影响:鼓励回顾或重新审视先前的 ACP 活动、激励患者直接采取 ACP 措施,以及作为采取行动的“警钟”。

结论

以疾病为重点的小组访问可能对 ACP 结果产生短期影响,但随着时间的推移,可能需要持续的 ACP 接触点来维持 ACP。结果强调了在单次小组访问后需要进行后续 ACP 对话。需要探索后续 ACP 对话的时间安排和理想的跟进人员。

相似文献

1
Impact of group visits for older patients with heart failure on advance care planning outcomes: Preliminary data.老年心力衰竭患者团体访视对预先医疗照护计划结果的影响:初步数据。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Oct;69(10):2908-2915. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17283. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
2
Feasibility of Group Visits for Advance Care Planning Among Patients with Heart Failure and Their Caregivers.心力衰竭患者及其照护者的预先医疗指示集体访视的可行性。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Jan-Feb;34(1):171-180. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.01.200184.
3
Effectiveness of Advance Care Planning Group Visits Among Older Adults in Primary Care.在初级保健中老年患者中,预先医疗照护计划团体访视的效果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Oct;68(10):2382-2389. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16694. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
4
Clinician Perspectives on Group Visits for Advance Care Planning Among Caregivers and Older Adult Patients With Heart Failure.临床医生对心力衰竭患者的照顾者和老年患者群体就诊进行预先护理计划的看法。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Mar-Apr;34(2):375-386. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.02.200270.
5
Adolescents and young adults with cancer conversations following participation in an advance care planning video pilot.青少年和青年癌症患者参与预先护理计划视频试点后的对话。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Feb 17;32(3):164. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08372-y.
6
Implementation and Impact of Patient Lay Navigator-Led Advance Care Planning Conversations.患者非专业导航员主导的预先护理计划对话的实施与影响
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Apr;53(4):682-692. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.11.012. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
7
Feasibility and Effectiveness of Virtual Group Advance Care Planning Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间虚拟团体预先医疗照护计划访视的可行性和效果。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Oct;41(10):1238-1245. doi: 10.1177/10499091241233687. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
8
A Pilot Randomized Trial of an Advance Care Planning Video Decision Support Tool for Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer.一项针对晚期癌症青少年和年轻成人的预先医疗照护计划视频决策支持工具的初步随机试验。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Jul;21(7):715-723.e17. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7021.
9
An Interview Study of Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Advance Care Planning in ESRD.终末期肾病患者和照护者的预先医疗照护计划观点访谈研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Feb;71(2):216-224. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
10
Advance care planning for adults with heart failure.针对成年心力衰竭患者的预先护理计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 27;2(2):CD013022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013022.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation and effectiveness of advance care planning in hospitalized older adults with chronic heart failure: a mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis.住院慢性心力衰竭老年患者预先护理计划的实施与效果:一项混合方法的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 29;12:1566977. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1566977. eCollection 2025.
2
Tools for tomorrow: a scoping review of patient-facing tools for advance care planning.面向未来的工具:对用于预先医疗护理计划的患者端工具的范围综述
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Jun 24;18:26323524241263108. doi: 10.1177/26323524241263108. eCollection 2024.
3
Advance Care Planning (ACP) in Medicare Beneficiaries with Heart Failure.

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility of Group Visits for Advance Care Planning Among Patients with Heart Failure and Their Caregivers.心力衰竭患者及其照护者的预先医疗指示集体访视的可行性。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Jan-Feb;34(1):171-180. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.01.200184.
2
Effectiveness of Advance Care Planning Group Visits Among Older Adults in Primary Care.在初级保健中老年患者中,预先医疗照护计划团体访视的效果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Oct;68(10):2382-2389. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16694. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
3
Advance care planning for adults with heart failure.针对成年心力衰竭患者的预先护理计划。
医疗保险心力衰竭受益人的预先医疗指示计划(ACP)。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Oct;39(13):2487-2495. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08604-1. Epub 2024 May 20.
4
What Clinicians and Researchers Should Know About the Evolving Field of Advance Care Planning: a Narrative Review.临床医生和研究人员应该了解的不断发展的预先医疗照护计划领域:叙事性综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Mar;39(4):652-660. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08579-5. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
5
"This is how I want it": Exploring the use of a workbook with persons with dementia to support advance care planning engagement.“这是我想要的方式”:探索使用工作簿支持痴呆症患者参与预先护理计划。
Dementia (London). 2022 Nov;21(8):2601-2618. doi: 10.1177/14713012221127358. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 27;2(2):CD013022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013022.pub2.
4
Feasibility of a Video-Based Advance Care Planning Website to Facilitate Group Visits among Diverse Adults from a Safety-Net Health System.基于视频的预先医疗照护计划网站对于促进来自医疗保障体系的多样化成年人小组访问的可行性。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Jun;21(6):853-856. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0476. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
5
Outcomes That Define Successful Advance Care Planning: A Delphi Panel Consensus.定义成功的预先医疗照护计划的结果:德尔菲小组共识。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Feb;55(2):245-255.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.08.025. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
6
A Group Visit Initiative Improves Advance Care Planning Documentation among Older Adults in Primary Care.一项团体就诊倡议改善了基层医疗中老年人的预先护理计划文件记录。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Jul-Aug;30(4):480-490. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170036.
7
Effect of the PREPARE Website vs an Easy-to-Read Advance Directive on Advance Care Planning Documentation and Engagement Among Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.PREPARE网站与易读的预立医疗指示对退伍军人预立医疗照护计划文件记录及参与度的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1102-1109. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1607.
8
Defining Advance Care Planning for Adults: A Consensus Definition From a Multidisciplinary Delphi Panel.为成年人定义预先护理计划:多学科德尔菲专家组的共识定义
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 May;53(5):821-832.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.331. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
9
Advance Care Planning Meets Group Medical Visits: The Feasibility of Promoting Conversations.预先医疗照护计划与团体医疗访视相结合:促进对话的可行性。
Ann Fam Med. 2016 Mar;14(2):125-32. doi: 10.1370/afm.1906.
10
Development and validation of a questionnaire to detect behavior change in multiple advance care planning behaviors.开发并验证了一个问卷,以检测多种预先医疗照护计划行为中的行为变化。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 5;8(9):e72465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072465. eCollection 2013.