Oliva-Lozano José M, Fortes Víctor, Muyor José M
Health Research Centre. University of Almería, Almería, Spain.
Unión Deportiva Almería, Almería, Spain.
Biol Sport. 2021 Jun;38(2):165-174. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2020.97674. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
The study aimed to compare the physical demands required during the first, second, and third most demanding passages (MDP) of play considering the effect of playing position, type of passage, and passage duration. A longitudinal study for three mesocycles was conducted in a professional soccer team competing in . Tracking systems collected total distance covered (DIS), high-speed running distance (HSRD), sprinting distance (SPD), total of high-intensity accelerations (ACC), and total of high-intensity decelerations (DEC). The results confirmed that a significant effect of the type of passage (first, second or third MDP of play) on DIS (F = 115.53; = 0.01; ηp = 0.45), HSRD (F = 422.82; = 0.01; ηp = 0.75), SPD (F = 299.99; = 0.01; ηp = 0.68), ACC (F = 268.59; = 0.01; ηp = 0.65), and DEC (F = 324.88; = 0.01; ηp = 0.69) was found. In addition, a significant interaction between playing position, type and duration of the passage was observed in DIS (F = 1.98; = 0.02; ηp = 0.05) and ACC (F = 1.92; = 0.03; ηp = 0.06). In conclusion, significant differences in physical demands between the first, second, and third MDP of play were observed. However, there were some cases (DIS and ACC) in which no significant differences were found between these passages. Therefore, coaches should consider not only the magnitude of these peak intensity periods (e.g., distance covered per minute) but also the number of passages that players may experience during match play.
该研究旨在比较比赛中最具挑战性的前三个段落(MDP)期间所需的体能要求,同时考虑比赛位置、段落类型和段落持续时间的影响。对一支参加[具体赛事]的职业足球队进行了为期三个中周期的纵向研究。跟踪系统收集了总跑动距离(DIS)、高速跑动距离(HSRD)、冲刺距离(SPD)、高强度加速总和(ACC)以及高强度减速总和(DEC)。结果证实,段落类型(比赛的第一、第二或第三个MDP)对DIS(F = 115.53;p = 0.01;ηp = 0.45)、HSRD(F = 422.82;p = 0.01;ηp = 0.75)、SPD(F = 299.99;p = 0.01;ηp = 0.68)、ACC(F = 268.59;p = 0.01;ηp = 0.65)和DEC(F = 324.88;p = 0.01;ηp = 0.69)有显著影响。此外,在DIS(F = 1.98;p = 0.02;ηp = 0.05)和ACC(F = 1.92;p = 0.03;ηp = 0.06)中观察到比赛位置、段落类型和持续时间之间存在显著交互作用。总之,观察到比赛的第一、第二和第三个MDP之间在体能要求上存在显著差异。然而,在某些情况下(DIS和ACC),这些段落之间未发现显著差异。因此,教练不仅应考虑这些峰值强度时段的大小(例如每分钟跑动距离),还应考虑球员在比赛中可能经历的段落数量。