Oliva-Lozano José M, Gómez-Carmona Carlos D, Fortes Víctor, Pino-Ortega José
Health Research Centre. University of Almería. Almería, Spain.
Research Group in Optimization of Training and Sports Performance (GOERD). Didactics of Music, Plastic and Body Expression Department. Faculty of Sports Science. University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.
Biol Sport. 2022 Mar;39(2):397-406. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2022.106148. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
The aims of this study were to: (a) describe and compare the volume and intensity from the workload of professional soccer players between training and MD, and (b) analyse the effect that the length of the microcycle had on the workload. A cohort study was designed for a full season in La Liga 123. Wearable tracking systems collected the distance covered in meters (m), total number of high-intensity accelerations (ACC) and decelerations (DEC), total number of high-speed running actions (HSRA), high-speed running distance (HSRD), high metabolic load distance (HMLD), and player load (PL) from training days (MD+1, MD-4, MD-3, MD-2, and MD-1) and MD. Significant differences were found between training and MD workload, MD workload being the most demanding for all intensity and volume variables (F = 36.35-753.94; p < 0.01; w = 0.21-0.85). The greatest training intensity and volume were found on MD-4 and MD-3 (p < 0.05). In addition, a novel finding was that the length of the microcycle had a significant effect on the workload both in volume and intensity (F = 4.84-14.19; p < 0.01; w = 0.03-0.09), except for relative ACC, DEC, and HMLD. Although MD-4 and MD-3 were the most suitable days for loading the players, the results showed that MD elicited a unique stimulus in terms of volume and intensity. Consequently, coaches need to include specific training drills to adapt the players for the competitive demands. Finally, special focus should be placed on MD from short and regular microcycles (5-day, 6-day, or 7-day microcycles) since declines in physical performance were observed in comparison with long microcycles (8-day or 9-day microcycles).
(a) 描述并比较职业足球运动员在训练和比赛日的工作量的量和强度,以及 (b) 分析微周期长度对工作量的影响。针对西甲123的一个完整赛季设计了一项队列研究。可穿戴追踪系统收集了训练日(比赛日+1、比赛日-4、比赛日-3、比赛日-2和比赛日-1)和比赛日的以米为单位的跑动距离(m)、高强度加速(ACC)和减速(DEC)的总数、高速奔跑动作(HSRA)的总数、高速奔跑距离(HSRD)、高代谢负荷距离(HMLD)以及运动员负荷(PL)。在训练和比赛日工作量之间发现了显著差异,比赛日工作量在所有强度和量的变量方面要求最高(F = 36.35 - 753.94;p < 0.01;w = 0.21 - 0.85)。在比赛日-4和比赛日-3发现了最大的训练强度和量(p < 0.05)。此外,一个新发现是微周期长度在量和强度方面对工作量都有显著影响(F = 4.84 - 14.19;p < 0.01;w = 0.03 - 0.09),相对ACC、DEC和HMLD除外。尽管比赛日-4和比赛日-3是给球员负荷的最合适日子,但结果表明比赛日在量和强度方面引发了独特的刺激。因此,教练需要纳入特定的训练练习以使球员适应比赛要求。最后,对于短且规律的微周期(5天、6天或7天微周期)应特别关注比赛日,因为与长微周期(8天或9天微周期)相比观察到了体能表现的下降。