Fitness Coach of PFC CSKA Moscow and Russian Football Union, Moscow, Russia.
Department of Physical Activity and Sport, Sport Science Faculty, Universidad de Murcia, San Javier, Spain.
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 23;15(4):e0232123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232123. eCollection 2020.
The purpose of the present study was to: (a) assess centripetal force (CentF) and changes of direction (COD) in elite soccer players according to playing position (central defender, CD; lateral defender, LD; central midfielder, CM; lateral midfielder, LM; forward, FW), laterality (right-footed vs. left-footed) and field zone (central vs. lateral), and (b) analyze the relationship between anthropometric characteristics (age, weight, height, body mass and fat mass) and non-linear locomotion workload. Thirty professional soccer players (age: 26.57±5.56 years) were tracked during the 2017-2018 season during friendly, national and international matches (38 total games) using inertial measurement devices. CentF and COD were the variables extracted for analysis. A one-way ANOVA was used for playing position comparison, a t-test for laterality and field zone, and Pearson's correlation coefficient to analyze relationships between anthropometric characteristics and dependent variables. There were differences by playing position in COD (556.33-to-412.18), R20COD (484.36-to-354.81) and R60COD (48.38-to-38.61) (p < .01; ωp2 = 0.03-to-0.05; CD>CM>LD>LM = FW); in CODHIA (49.75-to-37.11), R20CODHIA (16.04-to-9.11) and R60CODHIA (10.64-to-9.11) (p < .01; ωp2 = 0.03-to-0.07; CM>FW>LM>CD = LD); in CODSPRINT (14.56-to-8.40) and R20CODSPRINT (3.29-to-1.40) (p < .01; ωp2 = 0.03-to-0.04; FW = LM = CM>CD = LD); and in CentFMAX both in clockwise (992.04-to-902.09N) and counterclockwise (999.24-to-872.61N) directions (p < .02; ωp2 = 0.02-to-0.07; FW = CD>CM = LM = LD). The highest values of counterclockwise CentF were performed by left-footed players in the central zone (p < .001; d = 0.71-to-1.44) and clockwise CentF by right-footed players (p < .001; d = 0.04-to-0.55) in the lateral field zone. Moderate correlations were found between age, body mass and high intensity/sprints COD and repeated COD ability (p < .05; r = 0.235-to-0.383). Therefore, team staff should consider anthropometric characteristics, playing position, laterality and field zone to individualize training workload related to non-linear locomotion in soccer.
(a)根据比赛位置(中后卫、边后卫、中前卫、边前卫、前锋)、左右脚和场地区域(中央区和边区)评估足球运动员的向心力量(CentF)和变向(COD);(b)分析人体测量特征(年龄、体重、身高、体质量和体脂质量)与非线性运动工作量之间的关系。在 2017-2018 赛季,30 名职业足球运动员(年龄:26.57±5.56 岁)在友好、国家和国际比赛(38 场比赛)中使用惯性测量设备进行跟踪。提取 CentF 和 COD 作为分析变量。使用单向方差分析进行比赛位置比较,t 检验进行左右脚和场地区域比较,皮尔逊相关系数分析人体测量特征与因变量之间的关系。根据比赛位置,COD(556.33-412.18)、R20COD(484.36-354.81)和 R60COD(48.38-38.61)存在差异(p<.01;ωp2=0.03-0.05;CD>CM>LD>LM=FW);CODHIA(49.75-37.11)、R20CODHIA(16.04-9.11)和 R60CODHIA(10.64-9.11)存在差异(p<.01;ωp2=0.03-0.07;CM>FW>LM>CD=LD);CODSPRINT(14.56-8.40)和 R20CODSPRINT(3.29-1.40)存在差异(p<.01;ωp2=0.03-0.04;FW=LM=CM>CD=LD);在顺时针(992.04-902.09N)和逆时针(999.24-872.61N)方向的 CentFMAX 中也存在差异(p<.02;ωp2=0.02-0.07;FW=CD>CM=LM=LD)。在中央区域,左脚球员的逆时针 CentF 最大值最高(p<.001;d=0.71-1.44),在边区,右脚球员的顺时针 CentF 最大值最高(p<.001;d=0.04-0.55)。年龄、体质量和高强度/冲刺 COD 与重复 COD 能力之间存在中度相关(p<.05;r=0.235-0.383)。因此,球队工作人员应考虑人体测量特征、比赛位置、左右脚和场地区域,以实现与足球中非线性运动相关的个体化训练工作量。