FC Barcelona Sports Performance Department, Barcelona, Spain.
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
J Sports Sci Med. 2020 Feb 24;19(1):1-9. eCollection 2020 Mar.
The main aim of this study was to determine the physical demands of different small-sided ball possession games (SSBPGs) according to player field position and compare these demands in relation to the most demanding passages of play (MDP) in competitive matches. Global positioning system data were obtained from 25 football players (20.4 ± 2.1 yrs, 1.78 ± 0.66 m, 69.7 ± 6.1 kg) belonging to the reserve squad of a Spanish La Liga Club. Players were categorized according to positional groups; full back (FB), central defender (CD), midfielder (MF), wide midfielder (WMF) and forwards (FW). The variables analyzed were relativized to metres per minute (m·min): total distance covered (TD), TD at high speed (HSR; >19.8 km·h), TD at sprint (SPR; >25.2 km·h), the number of accelerations (ACC) and decelerations (DEC) at high intensity (> +/-3 m·s), the average metabolic power (AMP; W·kg) and the high metabolic load distance (HMLD; >25.5 W·kg). The MDP were analyzed using a rolling average method, where maximal values were calculated for 3 and 5 minutes to compare with SSBPGs using AMP as a criterion variable. The results were obtained from the SSBPGs relative to the MDP (expressed in %) for each player position. FB showed the greatest magnitude of overload in ACC/DEC according to the MDP in the two smaller SSBPGs formats (201-217%), whereas MF showed lower values (105-140%). The load expressed in relation to the MDP can be different depending on the format of the SSBPGs and the characteristics of playing position. These factors should be considered by the coaches when planning training.
本研究的主要目的是根据球员场上位置确定不同小场控球比赛(SSBPG)的身体需求,并将这些需求与比赛中最具挑战性的段落(MDP)进行比较。来自西班牙甲级联赛俱乐部预备队的 25 名足球运动员(20.4±2.1 岁,1.78±0.66 米,69.7±6.1 公斤)获得了全球定位系统数据。球员根据位置分组;后卫(FB)、中后卫(CD)、中场(MF)、边中场(WMF)和前锋(FW)。分析的变量相对于米/分钟(m·min)进行了归一化:总距离(TD)、高速距离(HSR;>19.8km·h)、冲刺距离(SPR;>25.2km·h)、高强度加速(ACC)和减速(DEC)次数(>+/-3m·s)、平均代谢功率(AMP;W·kg)和高代谢负荷距离(HMLD;>25.5W·kg)。MDP 使用滚动平均值方法进行分析,其中最大值为 3 分钟和 5 分钟,使用 AMP 作为标准变量与 SSBPG 进行比较。结果来自 SSBPG 相对于 MDP 的(以每个球员位置的百分比表示)。在两个较小的 SSBPG 格式中,FB 根据 MDP 在 ACC/DEC 中表现出最大的过载程度(201-217%),而 MF 表现出较低的值(105-140%)。根据 MDP 表达的负荷可能因 SSBPG 的格式和比赛位置的特点而有所不同。教练在制定训练计划时应考虑这些因素。