Kopetz Catalina E, Woerner Jacqueline I, Briskin Julia L
Wayne State University.
Yale University.
Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2018 May;12(5). doi: 10.1111/spc3.12385. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
In the present article, we propose that impulsive behavior may be a response to certain needs or goals that people have in the moment and could therefore be strategic. We review briefly the dominant approaches and findings in the impulsivity literature. We then examine different behaviors that are typically considered impulsive such as delay discounting, risky sexual behavior, risk taking in the context of emotion dysregulation, and adolescent risk behavior and present evidence suggesting that they follow the general principles of goal pursuit. Specifically, they are (a) enacted when perceived as relevant to the individual's motivation; (b) less likely when alternative means to fulfill these goals are available; and (c) supported rather than reduced by sufficient executive control, a hallmark of goal pursuit. We do not argue that there is no impulsive behavior. Rather, we suggest that such behavior may represent individuals' attempts to fulfill current motivations or needs. This approach emphasizes the functionality and dynamism of the behavior, it provides a framework to explain the inconsistencies in the literature, it helps us to move away from pathologizing or moralizing the behavior, and it provides insights about potential strategies to mitigate the negative consequences of acting impulsively.
在本文中,我们提出冲动行为可能是对人们当下某些需求或目标的一种反应,因此可能具有策略性。我们简要回顾了冲动性文献中的主流方法和研究结果。然后,我们考察了通常被认为是冲动行为的不同行为,如延迟折扣、危险性性行为、情绪失调背景下的冒险行为以及青少年冒险行为,并给出证据表明这些行为遵循目标追求的一般原则。具体而言,它们是:(a)当被认为与个体动机相关时会被实施;(b)当有实现这些目标的替代手段时可能性较小;(c)受到足够的执行控制的支持而非削弱,这是目标追求的一个标志。我们并非认为不存在冲动行为。相反地,我们认为这种行为可能代表了个体满足当前动机或需求的尝试。这种方法强调了行为的功能性和动态性,它提供了一个框架来解释文献中的不一致之处,它帮助我们避免将行为病态化或道德化,并且它提供了关于减轻冲动行为负面后果的潜在策略的见解。