Golden Chase E, Rothrock Michael J, Mishra Abhinav
Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Georgia, 100 Cedar St., Athens, GA, USA.
Egg Safety and Quality Research Unit, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Athens, GA, USA.
Poult Sci. 2021 Jul;100(7):101157. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101157. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
Recently, there has been a consumer push for natural and organic food products. This has caused alternative poultry production, such as organic, pasture, and free-range systems, to grow in popularity. Due to the stricter rearing practices of alternative poultry production systems, different types of levels of microbiological risks might be present for these systems when compared to conventional production systems. Both conventional and alternative production systems have complex supply chains that present many different opportunities for flocks of birds or poultry meat to be contaminated with foodborne pathogens. As such, it is important to understand the risks involved during each step of production. The purpose of this review is to detail the potential routes of foodborne pathogen transmission throughout the conventional and alternative supply chains, with a special emphasis on the differences in risk between the two management systems, and to identify gaps in knowledge that could assist, if addressed, in poultry risk-based decision making.
最近,消费者对天然和有机食品的需求不断增加。这使得有机、牧场和自由放养等替代家禽生产系统越来越受欢迎。由于替代家禽生产系统的饲养方式更为严格,与传统生产系统相比,这些系统可能存在不同类型和水平的微生物风险。传统和替代生产系统都有复杂的供应链,这为禽群或禽肉被食源性病原体污染提供了许多不同的机会。因此,了解生产各环节所涉及的风险非常重要。本综述的目的是详细阐述食源性病原体在传统和替代供应链中传播的潜在途径,特别强调两种管理系统之间的风险差异,并找出知识空白,若加以解决,可有助于基于风险的家禽决策制定。