Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Maternal and Newborn Health Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jun 5;20(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01452-z.
High coverage of care is essential to improving newborn survival; however, gaps exist in access to timely and appropriate newborn care between and within countries. In high mortality burden settings, health inequities due to social and economic factors may also impact on newborn outcomes. This study aimed to examine equity in co-coverage of newborn care interventions in low- and low middle-income countries in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.
We analysed secondary data from recent Demographic and Health Surveys in 16 countries. We created a co-coverage index of five newborn care interventions. We examined differences in coverage and co-coverage of newborn care interventions by country, place of birth, and wealth quintile. Using multilevel logistic regression, we examined the association between high co-coverage of newborn care (4 or 5 interventions) and social determinants of health.
Coverage and co-coverage of newborn care showed large between- and within-country gaps for home and facility births, with important inequities based on individual, family, contextual, and structural factors. Wealth-based inequities were smaller amongst facility births compared to non-facility births.
This analysis underlines the importance of facility birth for improved and more equitable newborn care. Shifting births to facilities, improving facility-based care, and community-based or pro-poor interventions are important to mitigate wealth-based inequities in newborn care, particularly in countries with large differences between the poorest and richest families and in countries with very low coverage of care.
高覆盖率的护理对于提高新生儿的存活率至关重要;然而,在国家之间和国家内部,及时获得适当的新生儿护理方面存在差距。在高死亡率负担的情况下,由于社会和经济因素造成的卫生不公平现象也可能对新生儿的结局产生影响。本研究旨在评估撒哈拉以南非洲和南亚的低收入和中低收入国家中,新生儿护理干预措施的共同覆盖情况的公平性。
我们分析了来自 16 个国家的最新人口与健康调查的二级数据。我们创建了一个包含 5 项新生儿护理干预措施的共同覆盖指数。我们按国家、出生地点和财富五分位数,考察了新生儿护理干预措施的覆盖情况和共同覆盖情况的差异。使用多水平逻辑回归,我们检验了高新生儿护理共同覆盖(4 或 5 项干预措施)与健康的社会决定因素之间的关联。
家庭和机构分娩的新生儿护理覆盖率和共同覆盖率存在国家间和国家内的巨大差距,而且存在基于个人、家庭、背景和结构因素的重要不平等现象。与非机构分娩相比,机构分娩中的财富不平等现象较小。
这项分析强调了机构分娩对于改善和更公平的新生儿护理的重要性。将分娩转移到医疗机构,改善机构内护理,并实施以社区为基础或有利于贫困人口的干预措施,对于减轻新生儿护理方面的财富不平等现象至关重要,特别是在那些最贫困和最富裕家庭之间存在巨大差异的国家,以及那些护理覆盖率非常低的国家。