• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于心室辅助装置自我护理模拟的精通学习对导线出口部位感染的影响:一项初步研究。

Effect of Ventricular Assist Device Self-care Simulation-Based Mastery Learning on Driveline Exit Site Infections: A Pilot Study.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022;37(3):289-295. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000824.

DOI:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000824
PMID:34091567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8647026/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ventricular assist device simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) results in better patient and caregiver self-care skills compared with usual training.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of SBML on driveline exit site infections.

METHODS

We compared the probability of remaining infection free at 3 and 12 months between patients randomized to SBML or usual training.

RESULTS

The SBML-training group had no infections at 3 months and 2 infections at 12 months, yielding a Kaplan-Meier estimate of the probability of remaining infection free of 0.857 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.692-1.00) at 12 months. The usual-training group had 6 infections at 3 months with no additional infections by 12 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates of remaining infection free at 3 and 12 months were 0.878 (95% CI, 0.758-1.00) and 0.748 (95% CI, 0.591-0.946), respectively. Time-to-infection distributions for SBML versus usual training showed a difference in 12-month infection rates of 0.109 (P = .07).

CONCLUSIONS

Ventricular assist device self-care SBML resulted in fewer 12-month infections.

摘要

背景

与常规培训相比,基于心室辅助装置模拟的精通学习(SBML)可使患者和护理人员的自我护理技能得到更好的提升。

目的

本研究旨在评估 SBML 对驱动轴出口部位感染的影响。

方法

我们比较了随机分配到 SBML 或常规培训的患者在 3 个月和 12 个月时保持无感染的概率。

结果

SBML 培训组在 3 个月时无感染,在 12 个月时发生 2 例感染,Kaplan-Meier 估计 12 个月时无感染的概率为 0.857(95%置信区间[CI],0.692-1.00)。常规培训组在 3 个月时有 6 例感染,在 12 个月时无进一步感染。Kaplan-Meier 估计的 3 个月和 12 个月时无感染的概率分别为 0.878(95% CI,0.758-1.00)和 0.748(95% CI,0.591-0.946)。SBML 与常规培训的感染时间分布显示,12 个月的感染率差异为 0.109(P =.07)。

结论

心室辅助装置自我护理 SBML 可减少 12 个月时的感染。

相似文献

1
Effect of Ventricular Assist Device Self-care Simulation-Based Mastery Learning on Driveline Exit Site Infections: A Pilot Study.基于心室辅助装置自我护理模拟的精通学习对导线出口部位感染的影响:一项初步研究。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022;37(3):289-295. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000824.
2
Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Improves Patient and Caregiver Ventricular Assist Device Self-Care Skills: A Randomized Pilot Trial.基于模拟的掌握学习可提高患者和护理人员的心室辅助装置自我护理技能:一项随机试点试验。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Oct;12(10):e005794. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005794. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
3
Low Incidence of Pump-Related Infections in Jarvik 2000 Ventricular Assist Device Recipients with a Subcostal Driveline Exit Site.采用肋下驱动线出口部位的Jarvik 2000心室辅助装置受者中与泵相关感染的发生率较低。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2019 Jun 1;46(3):179-182. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-15-5708. eCollection 2019 Jun.
4
Long-Term Success With Driveline Exit Site Relocation for Deep Driveline Infection in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients.左心室辅助装置患者深部导线感染的导线出口部位重新定位的长期成功经验。
Innovations (Phila). 2017 Nov/Dec;12(6):440-445. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000433.
5
A simple device to secure ventricular assist device driveline and prevent exit-site infection.一种用于固定心室辅助装置驱动线并预防出口部位感染的简易装置。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Apr;18(4):415-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt549. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
6
Driveline exit-site care protocols in patients with left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review.左心室辅助装置患者的外接管出口部位护理方案:系统评价。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Sep 11;60(3):506-515. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab195.
7
Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perceptions of Ventricular Assist Device Self-care Education Inform the Development of a Simulation-based Mastery Learning Curriculum.患者、照料者和临床医生对心室辅助装置自我护理教育的看法为基于模拟的掌握学习课程的开发提供了信息。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Jan-Feb;35(1):54-65. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000621.
8
Reduction of INCOR® driveline infection rate with silicone at the driveline exit site.在动力传输线出口部位使用硅胶降低INCOR®动力传输线感染率。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Feb 1;24(2):222-228. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw336.
9
Short-term Retention of Patient and Caregiver Ventricular Assist Device Self-care Skills after Simulation-based Mastery Learning.基于模拟的掌握学习后患者及护理人员心室辅助装置自我护理技能的短期保持情况
Clin Simul Nurs. 2021 Apr;53:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2021.01.004. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
10
Special Treatment and Wound Care of the Driveline Exit Site after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.左心室辅助装置植入术后驱动线出口部位的特殊处理与伤口护理
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Dec;63(8):670-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1554961. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Should Anaesthesiologists Be Taught to Perform Ultrasound-Assisted Neuraxial Access in Spinal Anaesthesia?-Protocol of a Randomised Controlled Study.麻醉医生是否应该接受在脊髓麻醉中进行超声辅助椎管内穿刺的培训?——一项随机对照研究方案。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Sep;69(8):e70108. doi: 10.1111/aas.70108.
2
Use of an ultrasound-guided intravenous catheter insertion simulation-based mastery learning curriculum to improve paediatric anaesthesia care.使用基于超声引导静脉导管插入模拟的掌握学习课程来改善儿科麻醉护理。
BJA Open. 2022 Oct 29;4:100101. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2022.100101. eCollection 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Left ventricular assist device-associated infections: incidence and risk factors.左心室辅助装置相关感染:发病率及危险因素
J Thorac Dis. 2020 May;12(5):2654-2662. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.26.
2
Left ventricular assist systems and infection-related outcomes: A comprehensive analysis of the MOMENTUM 3 trial.左心室辅助系统与感染相关结局:MOMENTUM 3 试验的综合分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Aug;39(8):774-781. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
3
Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perceptions of Ventricular Assist Device Self-care Education Inform the Development of a Simulation-based Mastery Learning Curriculum.
患者、照料者和临床医生对心室辅助装置自我护理教育的看法为基于模拟的掌握学习课程的开发提供了信息。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Jan-Feb;35(1):54-65. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000621.
4
Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Improves Patient and Caregiver Ventricular Assist Device Self-Care Skills: A Randomized Pilot Trial.基于模拟的掌握学习可提高患者和护理人员的心室辅助装置自我护理技能:一项随机试点试验。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Oct;12(10):e005794. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005794. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
5
Ventricular Assist Device Driveline Dressing-Change Protocols: A Need for Standardization. A Report from the SimVAD Investigators.心室辅助装置驱动线换药方案:标准化的必要性。来自SimVAD研究者的报告。
J Card Fail. 2019 Aug;25(8):695-697. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
6
Epidemiology of infection in mechanical circulatory support: A global analysis from the ISHLT Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Registry.机械循环辅助支持中的感染流行病学:来自 ISHLT 机械辅助循环支持登记处的全球分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Apr;38(4):364-373. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
7
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs database annual report: Evolving indications, outcomes, and scientific partnerships.胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 数据库年度报告:不断演变的适应证、结果和科学合作。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Feb;38(2):114-126. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.11.013.
8
Substantial Reduction in Driveline Infection Rates With the Modification of Driveline Dressing Protocol.实质性降低了导尿系统感染率与导尿系统敷料方案的改进。
J Card Fail. 2018 Nov;24(11):746-752. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2018.07.464. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
9
Reduction of driveline infections through doubled driveline tunneling of left ventricular assist devices-5-year follow-up.通过将左心室辅助装置的驱动线隧道加倍减少驱动线感染——5年随访
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jun;10(Suppl 15):S1703-S1710. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.127.
10
Advancing the Science of Self-Management in Adults With Long-Term Left Ventricular Assist Devices.推进长期使用左心室辅助装置的成年患者自我管理的科学研究。
Artif Organs. 2018 Nov;42(11):1095-1103. doi: 10.1111/aor.13113. Epub 2018 Mar 25.