• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于附加值视角的中美贸易摩擦经济效应分析

Analysis on the economic effect of Sino-US trade friction from the perspective of added value.

作者信息

Zhu Zhu, Zheng Hang, Zhu Zhu

机构信息

Business School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

School of Economics, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Environ Dev Sustain. 2022;24(1):180-203. doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01390-4. Epub 2021 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1007/s10668-021-01390-4
PMID:34093072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8171997/
Abstract

Based on the theory of trade added value, this paper discusses the potential actual trade scale and benefit damage degree of the two countries under the background of big country game by measuring the real trade scale of China and the USA, simulating the economic impact of tariffs imposed by China and the USA and utilizing Wang-Wei-Zhu (WWZ) method to decompose the potential changes in Sino-US trade. The results show that: firstly, the size of China-US trade in terms of total value is significantly overestimated and China's overall trade with the USA in 2001-2014 was overestimated by an average of 3.06 percent, of which goods trade was overestimated by 8.06 percent. Secondly, although tariff increases can reduce the degree of trade imbalance between China and the USA to some extent, the adverse effects are mutual and global, and the European Union, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Japan and Canada become the main transfer countries of Sino-US trade. Thirdly, the pattern of China's final exports and the US' intermediate exports determines that China's trade interests are more damaged than those of the USA. It is proved that there is a big gap between China and the USA in the depth and breadth of China's participation in the value chain division of labor and the trade scale measured by Gross Domestic Product is more instructive than the total value.

摘要

基于贸易增加值理论,本文通过测算中美实际贸易规模、模拟中美加征关税的经济影响以及运用王-魏-朱(WWZ)方法分解中美贸易潜在变化,探讨大国博弈背景下两国潜在的实际贸易规模及利益受损程度。研究结果表明:其一,中美贸易总值规模被显著高估,2001—2014年中国与美国的整体贸易平均高估了3.06%,其中货物贸易高估了8.06%。其二,虽然加征关税能在一定程度上降低中美贸易失衡程度,但负面影响是相互且全球性的,欧盟、东盟、日本和加拿大成为中美贸易的主要转移国。其三,中国最终品出口和美国中间品出口的格局决定了中国的贸易利益受损程度大于美国。研究证明,中国在参与价值链分工的深度和广度上与美国存在较大差距,用国内生产总值衡量的贸易规模比贸易总值更具指导意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dbf/8171997/01ef12d4f797/10668_2021_1390_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dbf/8171997/012d8e522e86/10668_2021_1390_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dbf/8171997/01ef12d4f797/10668_2021_1390_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dbf/8171997/012d8e522e86/10668_2021_1390_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dbf/8171997/01ef12d4f797/10668_2021_1390_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis on the economic effect of Sino-US trade friction from the perspective of added value.基于附加值视角的中美贸易摩擦经济效应分析
Environ Dev Sustain. 2022;24(1):180-203. doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01390-4. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
2
Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: considering the impact of Sino-US trade on three main industries in China.检验环境库兹涅茨曲线假说:考虑中美贸易对中国三大产业的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(36):54796-54812. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19522-2. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
3
Factors affecting fluctuations in China's aquatic product exports to Japan, the USA, South Korea, Southeast Asia, and the EU.影响中国水产品对日本、美国、韩国、东南亚及欧盟出口波动的因素。
Aquac Int. 2021;29(6):2507-2533. doi: 10.1007/s10499-021-00761-y. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
4
Real economic benefits and environmental costs accounting of China-US trade.中美贸易的真实经济利益和环境成本核算。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 1;279:111390. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111390. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
5
Agricultural Economic Evidence and Policy Prospects under Agricultural Trade Shocks and Carbon Dioxide Emissions.农业贸易冲击和二氧化碳排放下的农业经济证据和政策展望。
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Aug 24;2022:5988270. doi: 10.1155/2022/5988270. eCollection 2022.
6
A comprehensive study on carbon emissions flows and key drivers within China's domestic and global value chains.关于中国国内和全球价值链中的碳排放流动及关键驱动因素的综合研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Mar 15;916:169894. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.169894. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
7
Estimating the environmental and employment impacts of China's value-added trade from the perspective of value chain routes.从价值链路径角度估算中国增值贸易的环境和就业影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(48):73414-73443. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20575-6. Epub 2022 May 27.
8
Towards Cleaner Production Ecosystem: An Analysis of Embodied Industrial Pollution in International Trade of China's Processing versus Normal Exports.迈向清洁生产生态系统:中国加工出口与一般出口的国际贸易中体现的工业污染分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 11;19(16):9900. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169900.
9
Influence of carbon tariffs on China's export trade.碳关税对中国出口贸易的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(17):24651-24659. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17757-z. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
10
Research on the association of China-US virtual water trade based on hypothesis extraction method.基于假设提取方法的中美虚拟水贸易关联研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(19):54644-54656. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26237-5. Epub 2023 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of service outsourcing on labor income share: Measuring labor income share from the global value chains perspective.服务外包对劳动收入份额的影响:从全球价值链视角衡量劳动收入份额。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 11;19(9):e0309656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309656. eCollection 2024.
2
Competition among cities for export trade brings diversification: The experience of China's urban export trade development.城市间出口贸易竞争带来多样化:中国城市出口贸易发展的经验。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 15;17(9):e0271239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271239. eCollection 2022.