Leggett Amanda N, Troost Jonathan, Miner Jennifer A, Tsuker Sophia, Lai Jin-Shei, Carlozzi Noelle E
Institute of Gerontology and Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Jul;21(7):e70492. doi: 10.1002/alz.70492.
This study explores the validity and reliability of the measures of the five domains of caregiving style (CG-STYLE).
The sample included 209 family caregivers for an individual living with dementia. Floor and ceiling effect criteria were specified as ≤20%. Convergent validity was confirmed with correlations between similar domains (≥0.36-0.67 = "moderate"; 0.68-0.89 = "high"). Discriminant validity was shown by correlations (≤0.35) between dissimilar domains. Known groups were run by median split on measures of caregiving approaches.
The CG-STYLE domains were devoid of floor or ceiling effects except for maladaptive behavioral management strategies (ceiling 30.3%). Convergent and discriminant validity were supported. Known groups validity was supported (d's: 0.35 to 0.93) with a few exceptions.
Validity of the CG-STYLE measure assures its utility toward targeting and tailoring supports to dementia caregivers' specific CG-STYLE.
This paper presents validity data for the first-person-centered measure of cognitive and behavioral domains of dementia caregiving style (CG-STYLE). All domains had evidence for reliability and validity on more than 75% of the criterion except for the Orientation to Other domain, which met 66.66% of the criterion. Validity of the CG-STYLE item banks can increase their utility among clinicians, community service agencies, and researchers working with family and friend caregivers for individuals living with dementia.
本研究探讨了照护方式(CG-STYLE)五个领域测量方法的有效性和可靠性。
样本包括209名痴呆症患者的家庭照护者。地板效应和天花板效应标准设定为≤20%。通过相似领域之间的相关性(≥0.36 - 0.67 = “中等”;0.68 - 0.89 = “高”)来确认收敛效度。不同领域之间的相关性(≤0.35)表明了区分效度。通过对照护方法测量进行中位数分割来运行已知组。
除了适应不良行为管理策略(天花板效应为30.3%)外,CG-STYLE各领域均无地板效应或天花板效应。收敛效度和区分效度得到支持。已知组效度得到支持(d值:0.35至0.93),有一些例外情况。
CG-STYLE测量的有效性确保了其在针对痴呆症照护者的特定CG-STYLE进行支持的目标设定和定制方面的效用。
本文提供了以第一人称视角测量痴呆症照护方式(CG-STYLE)认知和行为领域的有效性数据。除了“对他人的定向”领域达到标准的66.66%外,所有领域在超过75%的标准上都有可靠性和有效性的证据。CG-STYLE题库的有效性可以提高其在临床医生、社区服务机构以及与痴呆症患者的家庭和朋友照护者合作的研究人员中的效用。