• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

团队学习在医学药理学课程学习成果中的有效性:来自困难学生的见解。

Effectiveness of a Team-Based Learning exercise in the learning outcomes of a medical pharmacology course: insight from struggling students.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, 401 S. Broadway, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.

Office of Medical Education, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2021 Sep;394(9):1941-1948. doi: 10.1007/s00210-021-02093-3. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00210-021-02093-3
PMID:34097095
Abstract

We have previously reported that multiple Team-Based Learning (TBL™) exercises in a 4-week pre-clinical medical school course improved final exam performance and significantly reduced the number of course failures. Here, we conducted a long-term study, with eight cohorts of first-year medical students, to determine whether the implementation of a single TBL individual readiness assessment test (iRAT) exercise in a 4-week medical school pharmacology course produces similar effects in overall course performance. We implemented a single TBL iRAT exercise that covered the subjects addressed during one week of the medical pharmacology course, with the four most recent cohorts of students matriculating at Cooper Medical School of Rowan University (n = 403). The first four cohorts matriculating at CMSRU did not participate in the TBL exercises (n = 266). Correlation of individual student TBL iRAT and final examination scores in the medical pharmacology course was compared to a second, unrelated first-year course (physiology) to control for variation in student performance between cohorts. We found that there was a significant moderate correlation between final examination and TBL iRAT scores (r = 0.49, p < 0.01, n = 403). Interestingly this moderate correlation was seen in students performing in the lower 25 percentile on the course final examination (r = 0.41, p < 0.01, n = 101) and negligible in students performing in the upper 25 percentile (r = 0.11, n = 101, p > 0.05). Implementation of the single TBL exercise also significantly reduced variance or range of student final examination performance compared to the group of the first four cohorts. These results suggest that implementation of a single TBL exercise, which covers only one week of content delivered in a 1-month medical pharmacology course, benefits first-year medical students by reducing the disparity in knowledge acquisition among them and providing a means to identify students who may struggle with course content.

摘要

我们之前报道过,在为期 4 周的医学预科课程中进行多次基于团队的学习(TBL)练习可以提高期末考试成绩,并显著降低课程不及格的人数。在这里,我们进行了一项长期研究,涉及 8 个一年级医学生队列,以确定在为期 4 周的医学药理学课程中实施单一 TBL 个体准备评估测试(iRAT)练习是否会对整体课程表现产生类似的影响。我们实施了一项单一的 TBL iRAT 练习,涵盖了医学药理学课程中一周内所涉及的主题,最近的四个学生队列入读罗文大学库珀医学院(n=403)。前四个入读 CMSRU 的队列没有参加 TBL 练习(n=266)。比较了医学药理学课程中学生个人 TBL iRAT 和期末考试成绩的相关性,与第二个不相关的一年级课程(生理学)进行了比较,以控制学生在队列之间的表现差异。我们发现期末考试成绩与 TBL iRAT 分数之间存在显著的中度相关性(r=0.49,p<0.01,n=403)。有趣的是,这种中等相关性在课程期末考试成绩较低的 25%的学生中可见(r=0.41,p<0.01,n=101),而在成绩较高的 25%的学生中则可以忽略不计(r=0.11,n=101,p>0.05)。与前四个队列的学生相比,实施单一的 TBL 练习还显著降低了学生期末考试成绩的方差或范围。这些结果表明,在为期 1 个月的医学药理学课程中,仅涵盖一周内容的单一 TBL 练习的实施使一年级医学生受益,通过减少他们之间知识获取的差距,并为识别可能难以理解课程内容的学生提供了一种手段。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a Team-Based Learning exercise in the learning outcomes of a medical pharmacology course: insight from struggling students.团队学习在医学药理学课程学习成果中的有效性:来自困难学生的见解。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2021 Sep;394(9):1941-1948. doi: 10.1007/s00210-021-02093-3. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
2
Implementation of team-based learning (TBL) in a second year medical school course: does prior experience with TBL improve the impact of this pedagogy?在第二年医学院课程中实施基于团队的学习(TBL):之前有 TBL 经验是否会提高这种教学法的效果?
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 18;22(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03363-1.
3
First year medical student performance on weekly team-based learning exercises in an infectious diseases course: insights from top performers and struggling students.医学一年级学生在传染病课程中每周进行团队学习练习的表现:来自优秀生和困难生的见解。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 3;19(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1608-9.
4
A Novel Grading Strategy for Team-Based Learning Exercises in a Hands-on Course in Molecular Biology for Senior Undergraduate Underrepresented Students in Medicine Resulted in Stronger Student Performance.一种针对医学领域中代表性不足的高年级本科学生的分子生物学实践课程中基于团队学习练习的新型评分策略,带来了更强的学生表现。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2019 Mar;47(2):115-123. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21200. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
5
Modified Team-Based Learning in an Ophthalmology Clerkship in China.中国眼科学实习中的改良团队学习法。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0154250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154250. eCollection 2016.
6
Evaluation of the effectiveness of student learning and teacher instruction on team-based learning during quality control of diagnostic imaging.在诊断影像学质量控制中,基于团队学习的学生学习和教师教学效果评价。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1732159. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1732159.
7
The outcomes of team-based learning vs small group interactive learning in the obstetrics and gynecology course for undergraduate students.团队学习与小组互动学习在妇产科本科课程中的效果比较。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Jun;103(6):1224-1230. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14804. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
8
Team-based learning versus traditional didactic lectures in teaching clinical biochemistry at King Abdulaziz University; learning outcomes and student satisfaction.团队学习与传统讲授法在阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学临床生物化学教学中的比较;学习成果和学生满意度。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 Jul;49(4):546-559. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21501. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
9
Academic performance among pharmacy students using virtual vs. face-to-face team-based learning.药学专业学生采用虚拟与面对面团队学习的学习效果比较。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2349205. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2349205. Epub 2024 May 13.
10
Weekly team-based learning scores and participation are better predictors of successful course performance than case-based learning performance: role of assessment incentive structure.与基于案例的学习表现相比,基于团队的每周学习得分和参与度是成功完成课程的更好预测指标:评估激励结构的作用。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Oct 4;21(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02948-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacology education in the medical curriculum: Challenges and opportunities for improvement.医学课程中的药理学教育:改进的挑战与机遇。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2024 Feb;12(1):e1178. doi: 10.1002/prp2.1178.
2
Multidimensional evaluation of teaching strategies for pharmacology based on a comprehensive analysis involving 21,269 students.基于对21269名学生的综合分析对药理学教学策略进行多维评估。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Mar 15;14:1145456. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1145456. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
First year medical student performance on weekly team-based learning exercises in an infectious diseases course: insights from top performers and struggling students.医学一年级学生在传染病课程中每周进行团队学习练习的表现:来自优秀生和困难生的见解。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 3;19(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1608-9.
2
Autonomic Nervous System Team-Based Learning Module.自主神经系统基于团队的学习模块。
MedEdPORTAL. 2016 Nov 29;12:10507. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10507.
3
A Novel Grading Strategy for Team-Based Learning Exercises in a Hands-on Course in Molecular Biology for Senior Undergraduate Underrepresented Students in Medicine Resulted in Stronger Student Performance.
一种针对医学领域中代表性不足的高年级本科学生的分子生物学实践课程中基于团队学习练习的新型评分策略,带来了更强的学生表现。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2019 Mar;47(2):115-123. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21200. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
4
Evaluation of the role of incentive structure on student participation and performance in active learning strategies: A comparison of case-based and team-based learning.激励结构对学生参与和表现的积极学习策略的作用评价:基于案例和团队学习的比较。
Med Teach. 2018 Apr;40(4):379-386. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1408899. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
5
Is lecture dead? A preliminary study of medical students' evaluation of teaching methods in the preclinical curriculum.讲座式教学已死?一项关于医学生对临床前课程教学方法评价的初步研究。
Int J Med Educ. 2017 Sep 22;8:326-333. doi: 10.5116/ijme.59b9.5f40.
6
Does team-based learning improve performance in an infectious diseases course in a preclinical curriculum?基于团队的学习能否提高临床前课程中传染病课程的成绩?
Int J Med Educ. 2017 Feb 8;8:39-44. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5895.0eea.
7
Applying established guidelines to team-based learning programs in medical schools: a systematic review.将既定准则应用于医学院的团队学习计划:系统评价。
Acad Med. 2014 Apr;89(4):678-88. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000162.
8
Perspective: Guidelines for reporting team-based learning activities in the medical and health sciences education literature.视角:医学和健康科学教育文献中报告团队学习活动的指南。
Acad Med. 2012 Mar;87(3):292-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318244759e.
9
The impact of team-based learning on medical students' academic performance.团队学习对医学生学业表现的影响。
Acad Med. 2010 Nov;85(11):1739-45. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f52bed.
10
Using team-based learning to teach pharmacology to second year medical students improves student performance.采用团队学习的方法教授医学生药理学能够提高学生的表现。
Med Teach. 2010;32(2):130-5. doi: 10.3109/01421590903548521.