• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种针对医学领域中代表性不足的高年级本科学生的分子生物学实践课程中基于团队学习练习的新型评分策略,带来了更强的学生表现。

A Novel Grading Strategy for Team-Based Learning Exercises in a Hands-on Course in Molecular Biology for Senior Undergraduate Underrepresented Students in Medicine Resulted in Stronger Student Performance.

作者信息

Carrasco Gonzalo A, Behling Kathryn C, Lopez Osvaldo J

机构信息

From the Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey.

Department of Medical Sciences, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Nutley, New Jersey.

出版信息

Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2019 Mar;47(2):115-123. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21200. Epub 2018 Dec 27.

DOI:10.1002/bmb.21200
PMID:30589488
Abstract

We developed a hands-on course in molecular biology for undergraduate underrepresented in medicine (URM) students. To incentivize student preparation for team-based learning (TBL) activities, we implemented a novel grading schema that requires a minimum individual readiness assurance test (iRAT) score to share the team group readiness assurance test (gRAT) score. Fifty-one students participated in this 2-year study and were divided in teams of five or six students that worked throughout the course on a unique, hands-on project and also participated in TBL exercises. In the laboratory sessions, students isolated RNA from cultured neuronal cells, synthesized complementary DNA (cDNA), and used gene sequencing to identify a gene relevant in human health and disease. Student participation in TBL was quantified and correlated with performance on individual iRATs and the course final examination. We found that implementation of the novel incentive structure lowered the variance of TBL scores (iRAT and gRAT) and strengthened the correlation between final examination scores and either iRAT scores or percentage participation in TBL. Subgroup analysis showed that with the new grading schema, stronger students benefited more from the gRAT exercises, while more poorly performing students were better helped by individual preparation prior to the iRAT exercise. A combination of two active learning strategies, TBL and hands-on sessions, may strengthen student acquisition of course content and promote teamwork skills. The new incentive structure seems to reduce the disparity in knowledge amongst our students as demonstrated by the reduced iRAT and gRAT score variances. © 2018 International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 47(2): 115-123, 2019.

摘要

我们为医学领域代表性不足的本科学生(URM)开发了一门分子生物学实践课程。为激励学生为基于团队的学习(TBL)活动做好准备,我们实施了一种新颖的评分模式,即要求个人准备度保证测试(iRAT)达到最低分数才能分享团队组准备度保证测试(gRAT)的分数。51名学生参与了这项为期两年的研究,他们被分成五人或六人一组,在整个课程中共同开展一个独特的实践项目,并参与TBL练习。在实验课上,学生从培养的神经元细胞中分离RNA,合成互补DNA(cDNA),并使用基因测序来鉴定与人类健康和疾病相关的基因。对学生参与TBL的情况进行了量化,并将其与个人iRAT成绩和课程期末考试成绩相关联。我们发现,新颖的激励结构的实施降低了TBL分数(iRAT和gRAT)的方差,并加强了期末考试成绩与iRAT成绩或TBL参与百分比之间的相关性。亚组分析表明,在新的评分模式下,较强的学生从gRAT练习中受益更多,而表现较差的学生在iRAT练习前通过个人准备得到了更好的帮助。两种主动学习策略,即TBL和实践课的结合,可能会加强学生对课程内容的掌握并促进团队合作技能。新的激励结构似乎减少了我们学生之间的知识差距,iRAT和gRAT分数方差的降低证明了这一点。© 2018国际生物化学与分子生物学联盟,47(2): 115 - 123, 2019。

相似文献

1
A Novel Grading Strategy for Team-Based Learning Exercises in a Hands-on Course in Molecular Biology for Senior Undergraduate Underrepresented Students in Medicine Resulted in Stronger Student Performance.一种针对医学领域中代表性不足的高年级本科学生的分子生物学实践课程中基于团队学习练习的新型评分策略,带来了更强的学生表现。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2019 Mar;47(2):115-123. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21200. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
2
First year medical student performance on weekly team-based learning exercises in an infectious diseases course: insights from top performers and struggling students.医学一年级学生在传染病课程中每周进行团队学习练习的表现:来自优秀生和困难生的见解。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 3;19(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1608-9.
3
Evaluation of the effectiveness of student learning and teacher instruction on team-based learning during quality control of diagnostic imaging.在诊断影像学质量控制中,基于团队学习的学生学习和教师教学效果评价。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1732159. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1732159.
4
Modified Team-Based Learning in an Ophthalmology Clerkship in China.中国眼科学实习中的改良团队学习法。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0154250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154250. eCollection 2016.
5
Effectiveness of a Team-Based Learning exercise in the learning outcomes of a medical pharmacology course: insight from struggling students.团队学习在医学药理学课程学习成果中的有效性:来自困难学生的见解。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2021 Sep;394(9):1941-1948. doi: 10.1007/s00210-021-02093-3. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
6
Implementation of team-based learning (TBL) in a second year medical school course: does prior experience with TBL improve the impact of this pedagogy?在第二年医学院课程中实施基于团队的学习(TBL):之前有 TBL 经验是否会提高这种教学法的效果?
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 18;22(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03363-1.
7
Weekly team-based learning scores and participation are better predictors of successful course performance than case-based learning performance: role of assessment incentive structure.与基于案例的学习表现相比,基于团队的每周学习得分和参与度是成功完成课程的更好预测指标:评估激励结构的作用。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Oct 4;21(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02948-6.
8
Application of Modified Team-Based Learning Approach for Enhancing Undergraduate Medical Educational Seminars.应用改良的基于团队的学习方法提升本科医学教育研讨会效果
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Jul 26;29(4):1163-1170. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00776-4. eCollection 2019 Dec.
9
Online and In-class Team-Based Learning in Undergraduate Immunology: a Comparative Analysis.本科免疫学中基于团队的线上与线下学习:一项比较分析
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Sep 17;29(4):1193-1199. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00814-1. eCollection 2019 Dec.
10
[Effectiveness of Team-Based Learning (TBL) as a new teaching approach for pharmaceutical care education].[基于团队的学习(TBL)作为药学服务教育新教学方法的有效性]
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2013;133(10):1127-34. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.12-00254.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of lecture-and-team-based learning in stomatology: in-class and online.讲座与团队学习在口腔医学中的应用:课堂内与在线。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 8;24(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05235-2.
2
Assessment for Learning with Ungraded and Graded Assessments.采用未分级和分级评估进行学习评估。
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Sep 14;32(5):1045-1054. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01612-y. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Collaborative Teaching plus (CT+): A Timely, Flexible, and Dynamic Course Design Implemented during Emergency Remote Teaching in an Introductory Biology Course.
协同教学加(CT+):在入门生物学课程的紧急远程教学中实施的及时、灵活和动态的课程设计。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Dec;21(4):ar61. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-08-0199.
4
Implementation of team-based learning (TBL) in a second year medical school course: does prior experience with TBL improve the impact of this pedagogy?在第二年医学院课程中实施基于团队的学习(TBL):之前有 TBL 经验是否会提高这种教学法的效果?
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 18;22(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03363-1.
5
Weekly team-based learning scores and participation are better predictors of successful course performance than case-based learning performance: role of assessment incentive structure.与基于案例的学习表现相比,基于团队的每周学习得分和参与度是成功完成课程的更好预测指标:评估激励结构的作用。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Oct 4;21(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02948-6.
6
Implementation of Team-Based Learning: a Tale of Two New Medical Schools.基于团队的学习的实施:两所新医学院的故事。
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Oct 15;29(4):1201-1210. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00815-0. eCollection 2019 Dec.
7
Effectiveness of a Team-Based Learning exercise in the learning outcomes of a medical pharmacology course: insight from struggling students.团队学习在医学药理学课程学习成果中的有效性:来自困难学生的见解。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2021 Sep;394(9):1941-1948. doi: 10.1007/s00210-021-02093-3. Epub 2021 Jun 7.