Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USA.
LGBT Health. 2021 Jul;8(5):359-366. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2020.0308. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
The purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence of and relationships among disordered eating, food insecurity, and weight status among transgender and gender nonbinary youth and young adults. This cross-sectional study involved a screening protocol to assess disordered eating and food insecurity risk from September to December of 2019 at a gender clinic using five validated measures: (1) previous eating disorder diagnosis (yes/no); (2) Sick, Control, One Stone, Fat, Food Questionnaire (SCOFF); (3) Adolescent Binge Eating Disorder Questionnaire (ADO-BED); (4) Nine-Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen (NIAS); and (5) Hunger Vital Sign. Age, assigned sex at birth, gender identity, stage of medical transition, and body mass index were collected. Pearson's correlation coefficients, between-groups -tests, one-way analysis of variance tests, and Tukey's honest significant difference test were used to characterize the relationships between variables. A total of 164 participants ages 12-23 years completed the screener. Using assigned sex at birth, 1.8% were underweight, 53% were a healthy weight, 17.1% were overweight, and 28.0% were obese. An estimated 8.7% reported a previous eating disorder diagnosis, 28.0% screened positive on the SCOFF, 9.1% on the ADO-BED, 75.0% on the NIAS, and 21.2% on the Hunger Vital Sign. Transgender males scored higher on the NIAS than transgender females ( = 0.03). Those with a previous eating disorder diagnosis scored significantly higher on the Hunger Vital Sign ( < 0.05). Gender clinics should routinely screen for disordered eating, food insecurity, overweight, and obesity to identify patients in need of further evaluation and referral.
本研究旨在描述跨性别和性别非二元青年和成年人中饮食失调、食物不安全和体重状况的流行情况及相互关系。本横断面研究在一家性别诊所采用了一种筛查方案,从 2019 年 9 月至 12 月使用五种经过验证的测量工具评估饮食失调和食物不安全风险:(1)以前的饮食失调诊断(是/否);(2)厌食症筛查量表(SCOFF);(3)青少年暴食障碍问卷(ADO-BED);(4)九项回避/限制食物摄入障碍筛查(NIAS);和(5)饥饿生命体征。收集年龄、出生时分配的性别、性别认同、医疗过渡阶段和体重指数。使用 Pearson 相关系数、组间 t 检验、单因素方差检验和 Tukey 诚实显著差异检验来描述变量之间的关系。共有 164 名年龄在 12-23 岁的参与者完成了筛查。根据出生时分配的性别,1.8%的人体重不足,53%的人体重正常,17.1%的人超重,28.0%的人肥胖。据估计,8.7%的人报告有以前的饮食失调诊断,28.0%的人 SCOFF 筛查阳性,9.1%的人 ADO-BED 筛查阳性,75.0%的人 NIAS 筛查阳性,21.2%的人饥饿生命体征筛查阳性。跨性别男性在 NIAS 上的得分高于跨性别女性( = 0.03)。有以前饮食失调诊断的人在饥饿生命体征上的得分显著更高( < 0.05)。性别诊所应常规筛查饮食失调、食物不安全、超重和肥胖,以确定需要进一步评估和转介的患者。