Herd Pamela, Mills Melinda C, Dowd Jennifer Beam
Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA.
University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
J Health Soc Behav. 2021 Sep;62(3):419-435. doi: 10.1177/00221465211018682. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
We detail the implications of sociogenomics for social determinants research. We focus on education and race because of how early twentieth-century scientific eugenic thinking facilitated a range of racist and eugenic policies, most of which helped justify and pattern racial and educational morbidity and mortality disparities that remain today, and are central to sociological research. Consequently, we detail the implications of sociogenomics research by unpacking key controversies and opportunities in sociogenomics as they pertain to the understanding of racial and educational inequalities. We clarify why race is not a valid biological or genetic construct, the ways that environments powerfully shape genetic influence, and risks linked to this field of research. We argue that sociologists can usefully engage in genetics research, a domain dominated by psychologists and behaviorists who, given their focus on individuals, have mostly not examined the role of history and social structure in shaping genetic influence.
我们详细阐述了社会基因组学对社会决定因素研究的影响。我们关注教育和种族,是因为20世纪早期的科学优生学思想促成了一系列种族主义和优生政策,其中大多数政策为如今依然存在的种族和教育方面的发病率及死亡率差异提供了正当理由并形成了相应模式,而这些差异是社会学研究的核心内容。因此,我们通过剖析社会基因组学中与理解种族和教育不平等相关的关键争议和机遇,详细阐述了社会基因组学研究的影响。我们阐明了为何种族并非一个有效的生物学或遗传学概念,环境如何有力地塑造基因影响,以及与该研究领域相关的风险。我们认为社会学家能够有效地参与遗传学研究,该领域主要由心理学家和行为学家主导,鉴于他们专注于个体,大多未审视历史和社会结构在塑造基因影响方面的作用。