• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会科学中的多基因指数(又名多基因分数):解读与评估指南。

Polygenic Indices (a.k.a. Polygenic Scores) in Social Science: A Guide for Interpretation and Evaluation.

作者信息

Burt Callie H

机构信息

Georgia State University.

出版信息

Sociol Methodol. 2024 Aug;54(2):300-350. doi: 10.1177/00811750241236482. Epub 2024 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1177/00811750241236482
PMID:39091537
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11293310/
Abstract

Polygenic indices (PGI)-the new recommended label for polygenic scores (PGS) in social science-are genetic summary scales often used to represent an individual's liability for a disease, trait, or behavior based on the additive effects of measured genetic variants. Enthusiasm for linking genetic data with social outcomes and the inclusion of premade PGIs in social science datasets have facilitated increased uptake of PGIs in social science research-a trend that will likely continue. Yet, most social scientists lack the expertise to interpret and evaluate PGIs in social science research. Here, we provide a primer on PGIs for social scientists focusing on key concepts, unique statistical genetic considerations, and best practices in calculation, estimation, reporting, and interpretation. We summarize our recommended best practices as a checklist to aid social scientists in evaluating and interpreting studies with PGIs. We conclude by discussing the similarities between PGIs and standard social science scales and unique interpretative considerations.

摘要

多基因指数(PGI)——社会科学中多基因分数(PGS)的新推荐术语——是一种遗传汇总量表,常用于根据测量到的基因变异的累加效应来表示个体患某种疾病、具有某种特质或表现出某种行为的倾向。将基因数据与社会结果联系起来的热情以及社会科学数据集中预建的PGI的纳入,促进了PGI在社会科学研究中的更多应用——这一趋势可能会持续下去。然而,大多数社会科学家缺乏在社会科学研究中解释和评估PGI的专业知识。在此,我们为社会科学家提供一份关于PGI的入门指南,重点介绍关键概念、独特的统计遗传学考量以及计算、估计、报告和解释方面的最佳实践。我们将推荐的最佳实践总结为一份清单,以帮助社会科学家评估和解释使用PGI的研究。我们通过讨论PGI与标准社会科学量表之间的相似性以及独特的解释性考量来结束本文。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4430/11293310/9e53f53a4081/nihms-1945778-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4430/11293310/9e53f53a4081/nihms-1945778-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4430/11293310/9e53f53a4081/nihms-1945778-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Polygenic Indices (a.k.a. Polygenic Scores) in Social Science: A Guide for Interpretation and Evaluation.社会科学中的多基因指数(又名多基因分数):解读与评估指南。
Sociol Methodol. 2024 Aug;54(2):300-350. doi: 10.1177/00811750241236482. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
2
Challenging the utility of polygenic scores for social science: Environmental confounding, downward causation, and unknown biology.质疑多基因评分在社会科学中的效用:环境混杂、下行因果关系和未知生物学。
Behav Brain Sci. 2022 May 13;46:e207. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22001145.
3
Resource profile and user guide of the Polygenic Index Repository.多基因风险指数知识库资源简介和用户指南。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Dec;5(12):1744-1758. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01119-3. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
4
Rank concordance of polygenic indices.多基因指数的等级一致性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 May;7(5):802-811. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01544-6. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
5
Calculating Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) in UK Biobank: A Practical Guide for Epidemiologists.在英国生物银行中计算多基因风险评分(PRS):流行病学家实用指南
Front Genet. 2022 Feb 18;13:818574. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.818574. eCollection 2022.
6
Sociogenomics in the 21 Century: An Introduction to the History and Potential of Genetically-informed Social Science.21世纪的社会基因组学:基因信息社会科学的历史与潜力导论
Sociol Compass. 2018 Oct;12(10). doi: 10.1111/soc4.12626. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
Ethical, legal, and social implications of genetic risk prediction for multifactorial disease: a narrative review identifying concerns about interpretation and use of polygenic scores.多因素疾病遗传风险预测的伦理、法律和社会影响:一项叙述性综述,确定对多基因评分解释和使用的担忧。
J Community Genet. 2023 Oct;14(5):441-452. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00625-9. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
8
Variable prediction accuracy of polygenic scores within an ancestry group.群体内多基因评分的预测准确性存在差异。
Elife. 2020 Jan 30;9:e48376. doi: 10.7554/eLife.48376.
9
Polygenic risk scores for the prediction of common cancers in East Asians: A population-based prospective cohort study.基于人群的前瞻性队列研究:东亚常见癌症的多基因风险评分预测。
Elife. 2023 Mar 27;12:e82608. doi: 10.7554/eLife.82608.
10
Using Polygenic Scores in Social Science Research: Unraveling Childlessness.社会科学研究中多基因评分的应用:解析无子女现象。
Front Sociol. 2019 Nov 22;4:74. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00074. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethics of genomic research on occupational status.职业状况的基因组研究伦理
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Feb;9(2):245-247. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02082-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Interpreting population- and family-based genome-wide association studies in the presence of confounding.在存在混杂的情况下解释基于人群和家庭的全基因组关联研究。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Apr 11;22(4):e3002511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002511. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Interpreting polygenic score effects in sibling analysis.在同胞分析中解释多基因评分效应。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 15;19(2):e0282212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282212. eCollection 2024.
3
Often wrong, sometimes useful: Including polygenic scores in social science research.经常出错,有时有用:将多基因分数纳入社会科学研究。
Behav Brain Sci. 2023 Sep 11;46:e213. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22002461.
4
Polygenic scores for social science: Clarification, consensus, and controversy.多基因社会科学评分:澄清、共识与争议。
Behav Brain Sci. 2023 Sep 11;46:e232. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X23000845.
5
All that glisters is not gold: Genetics and social science.闪光的未必都是金子:遗传学和社会科学。
Behav Brain Sci. 2023 Sep 11;46:e186. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22002217.
6
Irreducibly Social: Why Biocriminology's Ontoepistemology is Incompatible with the Social Reality of Crime.不可还原的社会性:为何生物犯罪学的本体认识论与犯罪的社会现实不相容。
Theor Criminol. 2023 Feb;27(1):85-104. doi: 10.1177/13624806211073695. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
7
Quality Control Procedures for Genome-Wide Association Studies.全基因组关联研究的质量控制程序。
Curr Protoc. 2022 Nov;2(11):e603. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.603.
8
Cross-trait assortative mating is widespread and inflates genetic correlation estimates.跨性状同型交配普遍存在,并夸大了遗传相关估计值。
Science. 2022 Nov 18;378(6621):754-761. doi: 10.1126/science.abo2059. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
9
Gene-environment correlations across geographic regions affect genome-wide association studies.基因-环境相关性在地理区域上的差异会影响全基因组关联研究。
Nat Genet. 2022 Sep;54(9):1345-1354. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01158-0. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
10
Luck, lottery, or legacy? The problem of confounding. A reply to Harden.运气、彩票还是遗产?混杂的问题。对哈登的回复。
Evolution. 2022 Oct;76(10):2464-2468. doi: 10.1111/evo.14588. Epub 2022 Sep 6.