School of Economics and Management, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, PR China.
Zhongshan Institute, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Zhongshan, PR China.
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 9;16(6):e0252960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252960. eCollection 2021.
This paper analyzes the option coordination problem of a fresh agricultural product supply chain under two supply chain structures, when the production cost and the loss rate are disrupted simultaneously. This paper provides the explicit option coordination conditions for the disrupted supply chain under two supply chain structures, and then explores the effects of the disruptions and supply chain structure on the option coordination conditions. The results suggest that it is unfavorable to apply the original coordinating contracts without disruptions to coordinate the disrupted supply chain. The coordination of the disrupted supply chain can be achieved with knowledge of the distribution of demand. In two coordinating contracts for the disrupted supply chain, the exercise price is still at the original level without disruptions while the option price deviates from the original level without disruptions. Moreover, the relationships of the coordination conditions in two supply chain structures depend on the value of the profit allocation coefficient. When the profit allocation coefficient exceeds (falls behind) a certain threshold, the option price is set at a higher (lower) value in the supplier-led supply chain structure than in the distributor-led supply chain structure, while the exercise price is set at a lower (higher) value in the supplier-led supply chain structure than in the distributor-led supply chain structure. Finally, the disrupted supply chain with any supply chain structure will perform better in the modified coordinating contracts than in the original coordinating contracts without disruptions.
本文分析了两种供应链结构下,生产成本和损耗率同时发生波动时新鲜农产品供应链的期权协调问题。本文给出了两种供应链结构下发生波动的供应链的明确期权协调条件,然后探讨了波动和供应链结构对期权协调条件的影响。结果表明,将没有波动的原始协调合同应用于协调发生波动的供应链是不利的。通过了解需求的分布,可以实现对发生波动的供应链的协调。在两种用于协调发生波动的供应链的协调合同中,执行价格仍保持在没有波动时的原始水平,而期权价格则偏离了没有波动时的原始水平。此外,两种供应链结构的协调条件关系取决于利润分配系数的值。当利润分配系数超过(低于)某个阈值时,供应商主导的供应链结构中的期权价格设定值高于(低于)分销商主导的供应链结构,而供应商主导的供应链结构中的执行价格设定值低于(高于)分销商主导的供应链结构。最后,任何供应链结构的发生波动的供应链在修改后的协调合同中的表现都将优于没有波动的原始协调合同。