Zinner Dietmar, Klapproth Matthias, Schell Andrea, Ohrndorf Lisa, Chala Desalegn, Ganzhorn Jörg U, Fischer Julia
Cognitive Ethology Laboratory, Germany Primate Center, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Department of Primate Cognition, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Primate Biol. 2021 May 21;8(1):19-35. doi: 10.5194/pb-8-19-2021. eCollection 2021.
Thorough knowledge of the ecology of a species or population is an essential prerequisite for understanding the impact of ecology on the evolution of their respective social systems. Because of their diversity of social organizations, baboons ( spp.) are a useful model for comparative studies. Comparative ecological information was missing for Guinea baboons (), however. Here we provide data on the ecology of Guinea baboons in a comparative analysis on two geographical scales. First, we compare climate variables and land cover among areas of occurrence of all six baboon species. Second, we describe home range size, habitat use, ranging behaviour, and diet from a local population of Guinea baboons ranging near the Centre de Recherche de Primatologie (CRP) Simenti in the Niokolo-Koba National Park, Senegal. Home ranges and daily travel distances at Simenti varied seasonally, yet the seasonal patterns in their daily travel distance did not follow a simple dry vs. rainy season pattern. Chemical food composition falls within the range of other baboon species. Compared to other baboon species, areas occupied by Guinea baboons experience the highest variation in precipitation and the highest seasonality in precipitation. Although the Guinea baboons' multi-level social organization is superficially similar to that of hamadryas baboons (), the ecologies of the two species differ markedly. Most Guinea baboon populations, including the one at Simenti, live in more productive habitats than hamadryas baboons. This difference in the ecology of the two species contradicts a simple evolutionary relation between ecology and social system and suggests that other factors have played an additional role here.
全面了解一个物种或种群的生态是理解生态对其各自社会系统进化影响的必要前提。由于社会组织的多样性,狒狒(狒狒属)是比较研究的有用模型。然而,几内亚狒狒( )的比较生态信息缺失。在此,我们在两个地理尺度的比较分析中提供几内亚狒狒的生态数据。首先,我们比较所有六种狒狒物种分布区域的气候变量和土地覆盖情况。其次,我们描述了塞内加尔尼奥科洛 - 科巴国家公园灵长类动物研究中心(CRP)西imenti附近的几内亚狒狒当地种群的活动范围大小、栖息地利用、活动范围行为和饮食情况。西imenti的活动范围和每日移动距离随季节变化,但它们每日移动距离的季节模式并不遵循简单的旱季与雨季模式。化学食物组成落在其他狒狒物种的范围内。与其他狒狒物种相比,几内亚狒狒占据的区域降水变化最大,降水季节性最强。尽管几内亚狒狒的多层次社会组织在表面上与阿拉伯狒狒( )相似,但这两个物种的生态却明显不同。大多数几内亚狒狒种群,包括西imenti的种群,生活在比阿拉伯狒狒更具生产力的栖息地。这两个物种在生态上的差异与生态和社会系统之间简单的进化关系相矛盾,表明其他因素在这里起到了额外作用。