Suppr超能文献

从尼日利亚队列的血浆样本中检测到低水平的 SARS-CoV-2 RNA:对输血的影响。

Low level SARS-CoV-2 RNA detected in plasma samples from a cohort of Nigerians: Implications for blood transfusion.

机构信息

Centre for Human Virology and Genomics, Microbiology Department, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria.

Biochemistry Department, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0252611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252611. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The present global pandemic triggered by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has lingered for over a year in its devastating effects. Diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently established with a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test by means of oropharyngeal-, nasopharyngeal-, anal-swabs, sputum and blood plasma. However, oral and nasal swabs are more commonly used. This study, therefore, assessed sensitivity and specificity of plasma as a diagnostic in comparison with a combination of oral and nasal swab samples, and the implications for blood transfusion. Oropharyngeal (OP) and nasopharyngeal (NP) swab samples were obtained from 125 individuals suspected to have COVID-19 and stored in viral transport medium (VTM) tubes. Ten millilitres of blood samples in EDTA were also obtained by venepuncture and spun to obtain plasma. Viral RNA was obtained from both swabs and plasma by manual extraction with Qiagen QIAamp viral RNA Mini Kit. Detection was done using a real time fluorescent RT-qPCR BGI kit, on a QuantStudio 3 real-time PCR instrument. Average age of study participants was 41 years, with 74 (59.2%) being male. Out of the 125 individuals tested for COVID-19, 75 (60%) were positive by OP/NP swab. However, only 6 (4.8%) had a positive plasma result for COVID-19 with median Ct value of 32.4. Sensitivity and specificity of RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 test using plasma was 8% and 100% respectively. There was no false positive recorded, but 69 (55.2%) false negatives were obtained by plasma. SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was detected, albeit low (4.8%) in plasma. Plasma is likely not a suitable biological sample to diagnose acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. The implication of transfusing blood in this era of COVID-19 needs further investigations.

摘要

由严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)引发的当前全球大流行已经肆虐了一年多。目前,通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测,通过口咽、鼻咽、肛门拭子、痰液和血浆来诊断 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)。然而,口腔和鼻腔拭子更为常用。因此,本研究评估了血浆作为诊断方法的敏感性和特异性,与口腔和鼻腔拭子样本的组合相比,并评估了对输血的影响。从 125 名疑似 COVID-19 的个体中获得口咽(OP)和鼻咽(NP)拭子样本,并储存在病毒运输培养基(VTM)管中。通过静脉穿刺获得 10 毫升 EDTA 血液样本,并旋转以获得血浆。通过手动提取 Qiagen QIAamp 病毒 RNA 迷你试剂盒从拭子和血浆中获得病毒 RNA。使用 BGI 实时荧光 RT-qPCR 试剂盒在 QuantStudio 3 实时 PCR 仪器上进行检测。研究参与者的平均年龄为 41 岁,其中 74 人(59.2%)为男性。在 125 名接受 COVID-19 检测的个体中,75 人(60%)的 OP/NP 拭子检测结果为阳性。然而,只有 6 人(4.8%)的 COVID-19 血浆检测结果为阳性,Ct 值中位数为 32.4。使用血浆的 RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 检测的敏感性和特异性分别为 8%和 100%。没有记录到假阳性,但通过血浆获得了 69 个(55.2%)假阴性。虽然含量低(4.8%),但仍在血浆中检测到 SARS-CoV-2 病毒 RNA。血浆不太可能成为诊断急性 SARS-CoV-2 感染的合适生物样本。在 COVID-19 时代,输血的影响需要进一步研究。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
COVID-19 transmission and blood transfusion: A case report.COVID-19 传播与输血:病例报告。
J Infect Public Health. 2020 Nov;13(11):1678-1679. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 May 13.
4
Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19.新冠病毒脱落和传播的时间动态。
Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):672-675. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0869-5. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
7
Review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) based on current evidence.基于现有证据对 2019 年新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)的回顾。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Jun;55(6):105948. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105948. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
9
A Review of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19).新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)概述。
Indian J Pediatr. 2020 Apr;87(4):281-286. doi: 10.1007/s12098-020-03263-6. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
10
COVID-19 and Blood Safety: Help with a Dilemma.2019冠状病毒病与血液安全:应对两难困境
Transfus Med Rev. 2020 Apr;34(2):73-74. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验