Oehler Caroline, Scholze Katharina, Reich Hanna, Sander Christian, Hegerl Ulrich
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Forschungszentrum Depression, Stiftung Deutsche Depressionshilfe, Leipzig, Germany.
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Jul 16;8(7):e28321. doi: 10.2196/28321.
Internet- and mobile-based interventions are most efficacious in the treatment of depression when they involve some form of guidance, but providing guidance requires resources such as trained personnel, who might not always be available (eg, during lockdowns to contain the COVID-19 pandemic).
The current analysis focuses on changes in symptoms of depression in a guided sample of patients with depression who registered for an internet-based intervention, the iFightDepression tool, as well as the extent of intervention use, compared to an unguided sample. The objective is to further understand the effects of guidance and adherence on the intervention's potential to induce symptom change.
Log data from two convenience samples in German routine care were used to assess symptom change after 6-9 weeks of intervention as well as minimal dose (finishing at least two workshops). A linear regression model with changes in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score as a dependent variable and guidance and minimal dose as well as their interaction as independent variables was specified.
Data from 1423 people with symptoms of depression (n=940 unguided, 66.1%) were included in the current analysis. In the linear regression model predicting symptom change, a significant interaction of guidance and minimal dose revealed a specifically greater improvement for patients who received guidance and also worked with the intervention content (β=-1.75, t=-2.37, P=.02), while there was little difference in symptom change due to guidance in the group that did not use the intervention. In this model, the main effect of guidance was only marginally significant (β=-.53, t=-1.78, P=.08).
Guidance in internet-based interventions for depression is not only an important factor to facilitate adherence, but also seems to further improve results for patients adhering to the intervention compared to those who do the same but without guidance.
基于互联网和移动设备的干预措施在治疗抑郁症时,若包含某种形式的指导则最为有效,但提供指导需要资源,如训练有素的人员,而这些人员可能并非总是可得(例如在为控制新冠疫情而实施封锁期间)。
当前分析聚焦于注册使用基于互联网的干预工具“我战胜抑郁”的抑郁症患者指导样本中的抑郁症状变化,以及与未接受指导的样本相比的干预使用程度。目的是进一步了解指导和依从性对干预措施诱导症状变化潜力的影响。
使用德国常规护理中两个便利样本的日志数据,评估干预6 - 9周后的症状变化以及最小剂量(至少完成两个工作坊)。指定一个线性回归模型,将患者健康问卷(PHQ - 9)得分的变化作为因变量,将指导、最小剂量及其交互作用作为自变量。
当前分析纳入了1423名有抑郁症状的患者的数据(940名未接受指导,占66.1%)。在预测症状变化的线性回归模型中,指导与最小剂量的显著交互作用表明,接受指导且使用干预内容的患者有特别更大的改善(β = -1.75,t = -2.37,P = 0.02),而在未使用干预的组中,指导对症状变化的影响几乎没有差异。在该模型中,指导的主效应仅略微显著(β = -0.53,t = -1.78,P = 0.08)。
基于互联网的抑郁症干预中的指导不仅是促进依从性的重要因素,而且与未接受指导但进行相同干预的患者相比,似乎对依从干预的患者能进一步改善结果。