• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过胃切除术后综合征评估量表-45评估六种主要胃切除手术对患者生活质量的影响比较。

Comparison of effects of six main gastrectomy procedures on patients' quality of life assessed by Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45.

作者信息

Nakada Koji, Kawashima Yoshiyuki, Kinami Shinichi, Fukushima Ryoji, Yabusaki Hiroshi, Seshimo Akiyoshi, Hiki Naoki, Koeda Keisuke, Kano Mikihiro, Uenosono Yoshikazu, Oshio Atsushi, Kodera Yasuhiro

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama 362-0806, Japan.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 May 27;13(5):461-475. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i5.461.

DOI:10.4240/wjgs.v13.i5.461
PMID:34122736
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8167845/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effects of various gastrectomy procedures on the patient's quality of life (QOL) are not well understood. Thus, this nationwide multi-institutional cross-sectional study using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 (PGSAS-45), a well-established questionnaire designed to clarify the severity and characteristics of the postgastrectomy syndrome, was conducted.

AIM

To compare the effects of six main gastrectomy procedures on the postoperative QOL.

METHODS

Eligible questionnaires retrieved from 2368 patients who underwent either of six gastrectomy procedures [total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (TGRY; = 393), proximal gastrectomy (PG; = 193), distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (DGRY; = 475), distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction (DGBI; = 909), pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG; = 313), and local resection of the stomach (LR; = 85)] were analyzed. Among the 19 main outcome measures of PGSAS-45, the severity and characteristics of postgastrectomy syndrome were compared for the aforementioned six gastrectomy procedures using analysis of means.

RESULTS

TGRY and PG significantly impaired the QOL of postoperative patients. Postoperative QOL was excellent in LR (cardia and pylorus were preserved with minimal resection). In procedures removing the distal stomach, diarrhea subscale (SS) and dumping SS were less frequent in PPG than in DGBI and DGRY. However, there was no difference in the postoperative QOL between DGBI and DGRY. The most noticeable adverse effects caused by gastrectomy were meal-related distress SS, dissatisfaction at the meal, and weight loss, with significant differences among the surgical procedures.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative QOL greatly differed among six gastrectomy procedures. The severity and characteristics of postgastrectomy syndrome should be considered to select gastrectomy procedures, overcome surgical shortcomings, and enhance postoperative care.

摘要

背景

各种胃切除术对患者生活质量(QOL)的影响尚未完全明确。因此,本研究采用胃切除术后综合征评估量表-45(PGSAS-45),在全国范围内开展了多机构横断面研究。PGSAS-45是一份成熟的问卷,旨在明确胃切除术后综合征的严重程度和特征。

目的

比较六种主要胃切除术对术后生活质量的影响。

方法

从2368例接受六种胃切除术之一的患者中收集合格问卷进行分析,这六种胃切除术分别为:Roux-en-Y重建全胃切除术(TGRY;n = 393)、近端胃切除术(PG;n = 193)、Roux-en-Y重建远端胃切除术(DGRY;n = 475)、毕罗一世重建远端胃切除术(DGBI;n = 909)、保留幽门胃切除术(PPG;n = 313)和胃局部切除术(LR;n = 85)。在PGSAS-45的19项主要结局指标中,采用均值分析比较上述六种胃切除术的胃切除术后综合征的严重程度和特征。

结果

TGRY和PG显著损害术后患者的生活质量。LR术后生活质量良好(保留贲门和幽门,切除范围最小)。在切除远端胃的手术中,PPG的腹泻分量表(SS)和倾倒SS发生率低于DGBI和DGRY。然而,DGBI和DGRY术后生活质量无差异。胃切除术最明显的不良反应是与进餐相关的困扰SS、对进餐不满意和体重减轻,不同手术方式之间存在显著差异。

结论

六种胃切除术的术后生活质量差异很大。选择胃切除手术时应考虑胃切除术后综合征的严重程度和特征,克服手术缺点,并加强术后护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea32/8167845/6d804b649711/WJGS-13-461-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea32/8167845/60da312ea6e3/WJGS-13-461-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea32/8167845/6d804b649711/WJGS-13-461-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea32/8167845/60da312ea6e3/WJGS-13-461-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea32/8167845/6d804b649711/WJGS-13-461-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of effects of six main gastrectomy procedures on patients' quality of life assessed by Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45.通过胃切除术后综合征评估量表-45评估六种主要胃切除手术对患者生活质量的影响比较。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 May 27;13(5):461-475. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i5.461.
2
Assessment of postoperative quality of life following pylorus-preserving gastrectomy and Billroth-I distal gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients: results of the nationwide postgastrectomy syndrome assessment study.胃癌患者行保留幽门胃切除术和毕罗Ⅰ式远端胃切除术后的生活质量评估:全国胃切除术后综合征评估研究结果
Gastric Cancer. 2016 Jan;19(1):302-11. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0460-9. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
3
Quality of life after total distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction: Use of the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45.全胃远端切除并Roux-en-Y重建术后的生活质量:使用胃切除术后综合征评估量表-45
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar 21;23(11):2068-2076. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i11.2068.
4
Factors affecting the quality of life of patients after gastrectomy as assessed using the newly developed PGSAS-45 scale: A nationwide multi-institutional study.使用新开发的PGSAS-45量表评估胃切除术后患者生活质量的影响因素:一项全国性多机构研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct 28;22(40):8978-8990. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i40.8978.
5
Evaluation of postgastrectomy symptoms after distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 (PGSAS-45).使用胃切除术后综合征评估量表-45(PGSAS-45)对毕Ⅰ式重建远端胃切除术后的症状进行评估。
Gastric Cancer. 2015 Jul;18(3):675-81. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0407-6. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
6
Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS)-45 and changes in body weight are useful tools for evaluation of reconstruction methods following distal gastrectomy.胃切除术后综合征评估量表(PGSAS)-45和体重变化是评估远端胃切除术后重建方法的有用工具。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun;21 Suppl 3:S370-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3583-z. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
7
Specific Features of Dumping Syndrome after Various Types of Gastrectomy as Assessed by a Newly Developed Integrated Questionnaire, the PGSAS-45.通过新开发的综合问卷PGSAS - 45评估不同类型胃切除术后倾倒综合征的具体特征
Dig Surg. 2016;33(2):94-103. doi: 10.1159/000442217. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
8
Background factors influencing postgastrectomy syndromes after various types of gastrectomy.影响各类胃切除术后胃切除术后综合征的背景因素。
World J Clin Cases. 2018 Dec 26;6(16):1111-1120. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i16.1111.
9
Predictive factors for body weight loss and its impact on quality of life following gastrectomy.胃切除术后体重减轻的预测因素及其对生活质量的影响。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul 14;23(26):4823-4830. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i26.4823.
10
Comparison of Postoperative Quality of Life among Three Different Reconstruction Methods After Proximal Gastrectomy: Insights From the PGSAS Study.三种不同近端胃切除术后重建方法术后生活质量比较:PGSAS 研究的启示。
World J Surg. 2020 Oct;44(10):3433-3440. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05629-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Current status, trends, and controversies in the selection of gastrectomy procedures: Insights from two nationwide questionnaire surveys conducted over a 7-year interval in Japan.胃癌切除手术选择的现状、趋势及争议:来自日本在7年时间间隔内进行的两项全国性问卷调查的见解
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2025 Mar 18;9(5):903-919. doi: 10.1002/ags3.70015. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Prospective Multicenter Observational Study on Postoperative Quality of Life According to Type of Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.根据胃癌胃切除术类型对术后生活质量的前瞻性多中心观察研究
J Gastric Cancer. 2025 Apr;25(2):382-399. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e26.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of postoperative quality of life by PGSAS-45 following local gastrectomy based on the sentinel lymph node concept in early gastric cancer.基于早期胃癌前哨淋巴结概念的局部胃切除术后 PGSAS-45 对生活质量的评估。
Gastric Cancer. 2020 Jul;23(4):746-753. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01047-7. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
2
Postoperative quality of life after laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy compared with laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.腹腔镜辅助保留幽门的胃切除术与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的术后生活质量比较。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Oct;35(10):1712-1719. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14985. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
3
Symptom Cluster Assessment Tools for Gastric Cancer Care in China: A Comprehensive Review.
中国胃癌护理症状群评估工具:全面综述。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Sep 2;30:e944414. doi: 10.12659/MSM.944414.
4
Intraoesophageal pressure in patients receiving proximal gastrectomy with hinged double flap method for gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study.采用带蒂双瓣法行近端胃癌根治术患者的食管内压力:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Dec 13;86(2):712-719. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001625. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Long‑term survival prognosis of function‑preserving curative gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.早期胃癌保留功能根治性胃切除术的长期生存预后
Oncol Lett. 2024 Jan 22;27(3):115. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14248. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction.腹腔镜胃近端切除术治疗上三分之一胃癌的手术效果:食管胃吻合术、胃管重建和双道重建。
BMC Surg. 2023 Oct 12;23(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02219-9.
7
Predictive model for long-term weight recovery after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an introduction to a web calculator.胃癌胃切除术后长期体重恢复预测模型:网络计算器简介。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Jun 23;23(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11050-7.
8
Effect of Four Main Gastrectomy Procedures for Proximal Gastric Cancer on Patient Quality of Life: A Nationwide Multi-Institutional Study.四种主要近端胃癌胃切除术对患者生活质量的影响:一项全国性多机构研究
J Gastric Cancer. 2023 Apr;23(2):275-288. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e14.
9
Impact of Tumor Location on the Quality of Life of Patients Undergoing Total or Proximal Gastrectomy.肿瘤位置对接受全胃或近端胃切除术患者生活质量的影响。
J Gastric Cancer. 2022 Jul;22(3):235-247. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2022.22.e23.
10
Functional evaluations comparing Billroth I with a large remnant stomach and Roux en Y with a small remnant stomach following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: An investigation including laparoscopic total gastrectomy.功能性评估比较了腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术后毕 I 式与大残胃、Roux-en-Y 与小残胃:包括腹腔镜全胃切除术的研究。
Surg Today. 2023 Feb;53(2):232-241. doi: 10.1007/s00595-022-02557-w. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
Updated evaluation of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery for early gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
内镜黏膜下剥离术与手术治疗早期胃癌的更新评估:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2020 Jan;73:28-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.027. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
4
Comparison of Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y reconstructions after distal gastrectomy according to functional recovery: a meta-analysis.胃远端大部切除术后毕罗氏 I、毕罗氏 II 和 Roux-en-Y 重建术的功能恢复比较:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019 Sep;23(17):7532-7542. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201909_18869.
5
Comparison of Quality of Life and Nutritional Status of Between Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I Reconstruction After Distal Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.远端胃切除术后 Roux-en-Y 与 Billroth-I 重建术后生活质量和营养状况的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutr Cancer. 2020;72(5):849-857. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2019.1656262. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
6
Comparison of the Physiological Effect of Billroth-I and Roux-en-Y Reconstruction Following Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy.腹腔镜远端胃切除术后毕Ⅰ式与 Roux-en-Y 重建术生理效应的比较。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018 Oct;28(5):328-333. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000575.
7
Function-preserving surgery for gastric cancer: current status and future perspectives.胃癌的功能保留手术:现状与未来展望
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Sep 25;2:77. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2017.09.07. eCollection 2017.
8
Comparison of quality of life between Billroth-І and Roux-en-Y anastomosis after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A randomized controlled trial.远端胃癌切除术后毕罗氏Ⅰ式与 Roux-en-Y 吻合术患者生活质量的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 12;7(1):11245. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09676-2.
9
Long-Term Outcomes of Using Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection to Treat Early Gastric Cancer.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌的长期疗效。
Gut Liver. 2018 Mar 15;12(2):119-124. doi: 10.5009/gnl17095.
10
Laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery for early gastric cancer.早期胃癌的腹腔镜前哨淋巴结导航手术
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 May 9;2:42. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2017.05.02. eCollection 2017.