在荷兰开展的一项针对老年人的数字随机试验:运用辟谣内容与非辟谣内容的媒体干预措施来对抗疫苗错误信息
A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial.
作者信息
Yousuf Hamza, van der Linden Sander, Bredius Luke, Ted van Essen G A, Sweep Govert, Preminger Zohar, van Gorp Eric, Scherder Erik, Narula Jagat, Hofstra Leonard
机构信息
Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University medical center, De Boelelaan 1117 - 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Psychology, School of Biology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
出版信息
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 May 15;35:100881. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100881. eCollection 2021 May.
BACKGROUND
As several COVID-19 vaccines are rolled-out globally, it has become important to develop an effective strategy for vaccine acceptance, especially in high-risk groups, such as elderly. Vaccine misconception was declared by WHO as one of the top 10 health issues in 2019. Here we test the effectiveness of applying debunking to combat vaccine misinformation, and reduce vaccine hesitancy.
METHODS
Participants were recruited via a daily news show on Dutch Television, targeted to elderly viewers. The study was conducted in 980 elderly citizens during the October 2020 National Influenza Vaccination Campaign. Borrowing from the recent literature in behavioural science and psychology we conducted a two-arm randomized blinded parallel study, in which participants were allocated to exposure to a video containing social norms, vaccine information plus debunking of vaccination myths (intervention group, = 505) or a video only containing vaccine information plus social norm (control group, = 475). Participants who viewed either of the video's and completed both a pre- and post-intervention survey on vaccination trust and knowledge, were included in the analysis. The main outcomes of this study were improvement on vaccine knowledge and awareness.
FINDINGS
Participants were recruited from the 13th of October 2020 till the 16th of October 2020 and could immediately participate in the pre-intervention survey. Subsequently, eligible participants were randomly assigned to an interventional video and the follow-up survey, distributed through email on the 18th of October 2020, and available for participation till the 24th of October 2020. We found that exposure to the video with addition of debunking strategies on top of social norm modelling and information resulted in substantially stronger rejection of vaccination misconceptions, including the belief that: (1) vaccinations can cause Autism Spectrum Disorders; (2) vaccinations weaken the immune system; (3) influenza vaccination would hamper the COVID-19 vaccine efficacy. Additionally, we observed that exposure to debunking in the intervention resulted in enhanced trust in government.
INTERPRETATION
Utilizing debunking in media campaigns on top of vaccine information and social norm modeling is an effective means to combat misinformation and distrust associated with vaccination in elderly, and could help maximize grounds for the acceptance of vaccines, including the COVID-19 vaccines.
FUNDING
Dutch Influenza Foundation.
背景
随着多种新冠疫苗在全球范围内推出,制定一项有效的疫苗接受策略变得至关重要,尤其是在老年人等高风险群体中。世界卫生组织将疫苗误解列为2019年十大健康问题之一。在此,我们测试运用辟谣来对抗疫苗错误信息并减少疫苗犹豫的有效性。
方法
通过荷兰电视台一档面向老年观众的每日新闻节目招募参与者。该研究于2020年10月全国流感疫苗接种活动期间在980名老年公民中进行。借鉴行为科学和心理学的最新文献,我们开展了一项双臂随机双盲平行研究,将参与者分为两组,一组观看包含社会规范、疫苗信息以及对疫苗谣言进行辟谣的视频(干预组,n = 505),另一组观看仅包含疫苗信息和社会规范的视频(对照组,n = 475)。观看任一视频并完成干预前后关于疫苗信任和知识的调查问卷的参与者被纳入分析。本研究的主要结果是疫苗知识和认知的改善。
研究结果
参与者于2020年10月13日至10月16日招募,并可立即参与干预前调查。随后,符合条件的参与者被随机分配观看干预视频并进行后续调查,调查于2020年10月18日通过电子邮件分发,参与者可在2020年10月24日前参与。我们发现,在社会规范塑造和信息基础上增加辟谣策略的视频曝光,会导致对疫苗误解的大幅更强抵制,这些误解包括:(1)疫苗会导致自闭症谱系障碍;(2)疫苗会削弱免疫系统;(3)流感疫苗会妨碍新冠疫苗的效力。此外,我们观察到干预中接触辟谣内容会增强对政府的信任。
解读
在媒体宣传活动中,在疫苗信息和社会规范塑造基础上运用辟谣是对抗与老年人疫苗接种相关的错误信息和不信任的有效手段,有助于最大限度地为包括新冠疫苗在内的疫苗接受创造条件。
资金来源
荷兰流感基金会。
相似文献
Health Promot Int. 2023-6-1
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022-6-20
Br J Health Psychol. 2023-11
引用本文的文献
Nat Hum Behav. 2025-8-8
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2025-7
Vaccines (Basel). 2025-6-7
BMC Public Health. 2025-2-12
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023-11-22
Nat Hum Behav. 2023-9
本文引用的文献
R Soc Open Sci. 2020-10-14
Lancet Digit Health. 2020-10
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021-5
Nature. 2020-5-13
Lancet. 2019-7-13
Nat Hum Behav. 2019-6-24
N Engl J Med. 2019-6-6