Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy, Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Linz, Austria.
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 17;16(6):e0253226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253226. eCollection 2021.
This paper provides an institutional and empirical analysis of the highly concentrated market of academic publishing, characterized by over proportionally high profit margins for publishing companies. The availability of latest research findings is an important issue for researchers, universities and politicians alike. Open access (OA) publication provides a promising but also costly solution to overcome this problem. However, in this paper we argue that OA publication costs are an important, but by far not the only way for academic publishers to gain access to public funding. In contrast, our study provides a comprehensive overview of the channels through which public expenditure benefits big academic publishing companies. Furthermore, we offer the results of an explorative case study, where we estimate the annual financial flows of public expenditures in Austria for the field of social sciences. In all, these expenditures add up to about 66.55 to 103.2 million € a year, which amounts to a fourth of total public funding for this field. Against this background, we contribute to the debate whether and to what extent public subsidies are justified for economically successful companies.
本文对学术出版市场高度集中的现象进行了制度和实证分析,该市场的特点是出版公司的利润率过高。最新研究成果的可获得性是研究人员、大学和政治家共同关心的重要问题。开放获取(OA)出版为克服这一问题提供了一个有前途但代价高昂的解决方案。然而,在本文中,我们认为 OA 出版成本是学术出版商获得公共资金的一个重要但远非唯一途径。相比之下,我们的研究提供了一个全面的概述,说明公共支出通过哪些渠道使大型学术出版公司受益。此外,我们还提供了一项探索性案例研究的结果,我们据此估算了奥地利社会科学领域公共支出的年度财务流量。总的来说,这些支出每年总计约为 6655 万至 1.032 亿欧元,占该领域公共资金总额的四分之一。有鉴于此,我们对公共补贴对于经济上成功的公司是否合理以及在何种程度上合理这一问题做出了贡献。